US concerned NASA will be overtaken by China's space program

L4sBot@lemmy.worldmod to Technology@lemmy.world – 294 points –
US concerned NASA will be overtaken by China's space program
interestingengineering.com

US concerned NASA will be overtaken by China's space program::undefined

118

If they were truly concerned, they’d start giving it the funding it deserves.

They've tried everything except actually funding NASA, and they're all outta ideas.

NOTE: China WILL overtake NASA, the same way they are dominating the renewable energy sector — because they invest heavily in science, and they do it early. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand this shit.

But hey we tried giving a shit load of money to a billionaire space nazi instead!

Maybe we need to give more to the space phallus that the other asshole billionaire built. Maybe that’ll fix it.

Unfortunately that company is the best hope we have to stay ahead. With their low cost they can monopolize the worldwide launch market(except Russia and China). So that funding, strategically, must continue.

What should also happen is funding spacex competitors, so we stay on the bleeding edge.

Is China staying on the bleeding edge by funding a bunch of private companies?

China has privately held space companies, yes. They are funding them, yes.

Maybe we should give money to fund education and research instead of banning books and attacking each other.

I came here to say exactly this.

Perhaps a space race with China would rekindle the motivation for our money grubbing demagogues to actually fund it.

No, it won't. They'll just relocate to China, or maybe a super yacht out in international waters. They'll continue milking every last cent out of the US until it's a dead dried up husk of a nation and then they'll just move to the next one. Their supporters are too stupid to realize where the end of the path they've been told to walk is going to take them, and they'd rather blame anyone else but themselves for all the problems they face. So no, a space race with China won't fix shit.

Judging by the state of the US, you're much more likely to be right than I am, you cynical bastard!

😂

3 more...

Gee whiz, maybe we should have been properly funding our space program all of these years instead of wasting it on making the military industrial complex filthy fucking rich and the world less secure overall?

Especially stupid considering last time they gave the space program appropriate funding, it led to a lot of advancements that the military industrial complex could use.

You make it sound like the military advancements were an unexpected byproduct, as opposed to the real goal.

The goal was optics. Kennedy didn't know what advances would result from Apollo. He wanted to show that the US was better at science and technology than Russia.

The science of putting a ballistic payload anywhere, including heaven.

The space race was awesome because it let the two countries measure their dicks (specifically their military dicks) without actually obliterating the planet.

The "for all mankind" angle was a great way to frame things for the population of Earth, for sure. But just like mobile chemical WMD labs in Iraq, sometimes the given justification and actual justification are two different things.

Don't get me wrong, there absolutely were beneficial optics. Something doesn't have to just be for one thing. But it was always primarily about practical demonstration of weapons capacity under the facade of human exploration.

I don't disagree, but has anyone found corroborating evidence or documentation, past speculation and reasonable assumption?

No, I don't think anyone has definitely proven that George W Bush and Colin Powell KNEW that the WMD claims in Iraq were bullshit when they were presenting them as the primary justification for the war.

It's just the nature of the beast.

Ha, I was actually taking about the space program, but same for the invasion. Although, I feel like more people have come forward about the invasion being BS than early space program stuff.

People behind the scenes are siphoning NASA space research money and turning it into space profit instead. The growth of private space companies starting in the US is no coincidence. Blame oligarchs for steering the country into a dead end.

Hate on spacex and its competitors as much as you want, im not saying you dont have cause.

But defunding NASA caused this. Those billionaires looked and said holy shit, the entire nasa budget is only that much? And they arent building rockets anymore? I can literally fund my own space program? Ide be crazy not to

To be fair, it's not as if those things are mutually-exclusive. For example, you know how the Hubble Space Telescope is this extremely unique and nigh-irreplaceable scientific instrument that cost a pretty big fraction of NASA's entire budget?

Well, it turns out we actually have dozens of the damn things; it's just that we couldn't be bothered to actually point more than one of them away from Earth instead of towards it.

Hell, a decade ago the National Reconnaissance Office gave NASA a couple for free 'cause they just had 'em lying around, but (as far as I know) NASA hasn't managed to scrounge up enough money from the couch cushions to spruce 'em up and launch 'em yet.

They certainly don't have to be, but there is a well established pattern of the US government getting waaay too chummy with corporations to the point that it can undermine what's best for the people in pursuit of corporate interests.

US: continually decides to not fund scientific exploration of space

Also US: GUYS! BE AFRAID! ANOTHER COUNTRY DID DECIDE TO SPEND MONEY ON IT! NOW WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO IF…UM…WELL, I GUESS IF THEY TAKE OVER SPACE…? Or…wait, what are we concerned about? Ah, fuck it. Cut NASA’s budget again. We got genocide to fund and taxes to cut for the wealthy.

Same with Republicans and the border.

"Do something about the border!"

"Ok, we need funds. Please give them to us."

"No! Do something about the border!"

"We can't because you won't give us the money."

"Too bad! Do something about the border!"

12 more...
12 more...

Huh. I wonder if funding NASA better might help, Republicans?

They are likely going to fund it less and give more and more of its mission over to space force and private companies is my guess

That would also work.

The only thing that won't work for space is the thing we're doing now:

  • Maintaining a vice-like government control
  • Using that government authority to choose not to move forward

Progress only stops under a narrow set of conditions that need to be actively implemented by the government. Progress is actually natural, and progress stopping requires enormous centralized effort to interfere with people getting things done.

I disagree privitizing space will do absolutly nothing but lead to balooned costs and stagnation.

Theoretically private programs would be an increased cost over a NASA only program since private companies want a profit margin.

But Congress being what it is tends to require NASA programs to create jobs in a lot of different voting districts across the country which leads to an insane amount of inefficiencies.

We can't have nice things because of pork barrel politics.

Private Companies however have no insintive to actualy innovate, if you look at them they are all taking decades old NASA and USSR Space program tech and resuing it ... and callling it innovation

I'm sorry... this is not true lol. You know what SpaceX is up to, right? At the least, but there are tons of interesting and innovative companies. I mean hell look at Stoke Space

If we fold it into the space force and say it’s for targeting woke weirdos…we’ll get a billion dollars through congress by tomorrow

Call it "search for extraterrestrial woke intelligence" and they'll melt.

Intelligence that doesn’t come from jeebus?! They’ll burn that ark before it leaves the ground

Search for god or his patio or whatever…now you’ve got Midwest money

"Search for extraterrestrial divine intelligence" or "a strategy to get closer to God through space colonization", say, a Stanford torus in some L point (that's so expensive that it ain't gonna happen, but they'll also be very excited, I think).

We could just say the "anti-woke" part and not even bother with the space force part and that would probably work.

The woke boogieman is the biggest thing to scare them in years.

The woke boogeyman scares us because it, itself, is a set of false threats that are distracting us from real threats.

Like, we're worried about war, a shifting global power structure, the degradation of systems of detente that keep the worst in humanity from emerging, and the woke crowd wants us to treat the feelings of exclusion of trans people as the most important threat on the board.

The woke movement is a boogeyman movement, and that's why we treat it as dangerous. The woke movement is a push to get new boogeymen added to our threat list and moved to top priority over things we know will actually kill us.

And thing that really, really scares us, is that the system that has proven to be the salve for the ills of massive unleashed violence, the system we call free market economics, is being targeted by the woke crowd because they refuse to read the history of the things they're proposing. They're all like "we don't want people to suffer so let's abolish private property". That's like saying "we don't want people to drown, and people tend to drown when they're near boats, so let's destroy this boat we're all in, to prevent drowning!"

It's terrifying to us because there are serious things to be afraid of, and the woke movement is asking us to ignore or even embrace those things.

There is no "woke movement." That's exactly why you're scared of a boogieman. They don't exist either.

1 more...
1 more...

Switch the funding for the MIC and NASA for one year. We'll have fusion power cracked in 5.

1 more...

One can only hope.

The last time that happened, we explored the moon and developed the space shuttle program. We got microchips and memory foam.

Ideological rivals encourage congress throwing money into big science. Apollo returned $14 on the dollar. It's a good investment.

Choosing Musk and SpaceX for Artemis is likely NASAs biggest mistake.

It was always part of Musk's plan to cripple NASA funding and pump that money into SpaceX.

If you look at the Artemis mission and think starship is the weakest part of the plan, you are simply not being objective.

SpaceX has launched more successful missions this year than every other space agency put together.

Fuck Musk and all that, but if you're posting this bullshit, you have Musk derangement syndrome.

for real. and starship is an awesome program

NASA is a fraud. Musk is just the latest goofy face of govt black projects. Keyfabe

Have they considered renaming it X and firing all their expert staff to make NASA more profitable?

SpaceX is already a thing. What is it with Elon Musk and the letter X?

This is a good thing. Competition with the USSR made NASA what it is.

Who would have imagined that decades of funding cuts and pressure to rely upon Musk would allow another nation to take the lead? (Sarcasm)

Dang maybe we should take a fraction of the trillions we spend on the military to fund scientific research, and also health and education while we're at it so we'd get even more potential scientists.

Yes, race harder please.

I'm sure throwing more money and contracts at Musk and SpaceX is going to help solve the problem any day now. /s

Export all your technology and jobs to cheaper labour to make more profit. Now you will slowly become bankrupt, as no one can afford the enshitification products and services.

Enshittification doesn't just mean "things get worse"

Looking at their space station, I think China already has overtaken NASA.

Their station has like three modules (with plans to add 3 more) and capacity for 3 people. The ISS has at least 16 modules (maybe over 30 depending on what you count as a module) and capacity for over a dozen people.

Like many things from authoritarian countries, it looks nice but isn't even close in terms of capabilities.

Authoritarianism is not equal to capabilities. In fact, the Soviet space program was significantly more capable for a very long time

So they had no issue relying on Russia to service the ISS ever since they shutdown the space shuttle, but now they're afraid of China... doing space science faster?

Ignoring the fact that this is not even a real concern, maybe don't spend morbillions on free munitions for Israel or Lockheed's next stupid idea.

They defunded NASA so hard that they started hallucinating about going back to the moon with 15% of the Apollo budget.

At the time, Russia wasn’t as…..problematic. We had been working with Russia as an International Partner since the very early days of ISS and even during Shuttle/Mir.

Obviously they did become problematic, but we didn’t have other options until SpaceX. Now that’s….obviously got its own issues, but Russia is vastly different than China when it comes to space. Russia needs the money, China already has it.

The fact that NASA had to rely on Roscosmos in the first place is shameful. It highlights long standing issues facing the space program. I think some of these problems trace back to the cost of the ISS. It's been hard to convey the importance and investment into the future the station provides.

For China their station provides proof of concept that they can achieve similar results one day both to themselves and the world watching.

The amount of money spent on Apollo was insane. A reduced budget should have been sufficient. It's just been weighted down by shit cost-plus contracts and the abomination that is SLS.

The fear of China here is that they are basically single handedly their closest competitor. They're the only other nation thats managed a Mars Rover landing, building space station, and have their own plans for Moon and Mars with taikonauts( astronaut equivalent) on the ground in the future.

Anyone concerned that the US will be "overtaken" by anything coming out of China right now needs to go read about what's been happening in China for the last 5 years.

What do you mean?

If you watch anything other than chinadaily (the CCPs propaganda channel) you'd know exactly what I mean.

I wasn’t trying to say you were wrong…I legitimately don’t know what you’re trying to say.

Dumbest answer to a simple question, congrats! 🥳

We all live on this rock. Floating through space.

Anyone who doesn’t want to spend more time looking out is someone with something in their closet you don’t want to look in.

Ad Astra per Aspera

"To thorns, to stars"?..

well, I think he meant: Per aspera ad astra

just remember that almost all older languages had fewer nouns and verbs, so "thorns" here is referring to difficulty and obstruction

so more meaningfully translated, this old Latin saying is closer to "through great treachery is the path to the stars"

Yes, I know the saying, just was a bit unkind

Ok so the Starfleet quote is “Ad Astra per Aspera”. Should it be Per Aspera ad Astra? Asking for Latin grammar lessons

I mean it's not that hard to recognize "thorns" meaning difficulty and obstruction.

But as I'm saying this, I remember that younger generations didn't spend time outside as kids. So they may never have pushed through a thicket of thorns.

Eventually, we'll have people who've lived their entire lives in zero-G, and they won't have an intuitive understanding of the feelings implied by the phrase "stand up for oneself". They won't understand the state of motivation versus fatigue implied by "holding one's chin up", that the posture of one's body was a function of the interplay between gravity and dopamine.

theythey have the qote mixed up its Ad Astra Per Aspare, To the stars through dificalties... you see it everywhere in Kansas

Don't worry guys, the US Space Force will make sure they are prevented from entering space.

They must have made some huge advances since the last time I checked in on them because they haven't exactly been considered sophisticated in the art of rocketry for a couple centuries now. They first had a person in space in 2003 and they're still using the same Shenzou line of rockets since that time. They've had some controversies about where their boosters are landing and covering people with Hydrazine which is also an outdated fuel type, imo.

Yeah you missed the part where they have a fucking space station and a growing private sector of reusable launch vehicles that are copying SpaceX.

We're impressed by a space station? What is this, 1976?

I'll admit it's an improvement over their situation before the early 80s where 88.7% of people in China were below the poverty line.

Yeah, a space station is actually pretty impressive given that no other country besides the US and Russia have one, and that will be gone by 2030 with no plans for a replacement. If you don't think a Space station is impressive then you're very ignorant. So in a few years China will have the only space station in space. They launch multiple rockets per week while the US just has SpaceX launching at a similar cadence. Go stick your head in the sand if you want, but outside of SpaceX the Chinese have a better space program and just saying "we did it x many years ago" is completely irrelevant to today. All of the tech isn't here anymore. There is no space shuttle. The SLS is a boondoggle that will never fly after a few expensive Artemis missions. ULA is basically bankrupt and trying to get sold. Boeing Space is a disaster. Today is what matters and I believe Chinas space program is in a much better place than ours. Today. It's a result of attitudes like yours that handwave away anything that China does and leads to stagnation and complacency and corruption

The ISS was designed and built in various countries across 4 continents in the 80s and 90s, I would hardly call it only Russia's and the USA's. I honestly respect India's Aerospace more than China's current level of technology. Even the UK, who historically have had no interest in the field, are in the midst of planning 2 massive Space Ports in England and Scotland.

I'm not dismissing the failures of USA Space Program, it's so inefficient to its core that Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos each started their own rocketry firms that blew conventional compartmentalized industry pricing out of the running. I'm just striving for accuracy of Chinese Failures. They're not currently neck and neck with us, at all. When they figure out how to make coal powered rockets, then maybe I'll sweat a little, lol.

NASA and all it's bureaucracy was overtaken by private corps years ago.

Privatization was NASA’s strategy. They actually oversee the distribution of funds to private companies. Space X is paid out of NASA’s budget.