They would have 40 electoral college votes in 2024.
If they secede, that would also mean losing 2 Senators and 38 Representatives, changing the balance of power in the House and Senate.
Don't threaten me with a good time!
Edit I also want to see Ted Cruz's face when he learns he's not a Senator anymore because Texas seceded.
He would just move to Florida
Cancun.
Which he thinks is in Florida
Oh no. Democrats would need to find two additional no votes to block anything progressive.
If they secede, that would also mean losing 2 Senators and 38 Representatives, changing the balance of power in the House and Senate.
Losing 2 Senators, yes, but the loss of 38 Reps would be temporary. The size of Congress is permanently fixed by legislation to 435, and in the hypothetical case where a state simply goes poof, and 38 Representatives disappear, those seats would be reapportioned to other states after the next Census.
There is precedent for this, when Alaska and Hawaii were added as States, they were each given 1 Representative right away, temporarily increasing the size of Congress to 437, until 2 seats were removed in the next apportionment.
While there is no guarantee on where Texas' seats would go -- it would depend on the next Census after secession -- it is plausible that the new seats would be from less conservative districts than their current makeup.
The size of Congress is permanently fixed by legislation to 435
Speaking of which, we should absolutely do away with that. That is specifically capped just to help Republicans.
Rafeal Cruz. We must respect this man's choice to only recognize the name on the birth certificate
Cruz would finally have a shot at becoming a president.
So nowhere in the article is it mentioned that the supposed "Texas right to secede" is actually bullshit, and a complete misunderstanding of the actual right that they have, which is to be broken up into five separate states.
Except even that is bullshit, because it was talking about the Texas Territory, which was larger than modern day Texas.
The constitution clearly says that;
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
So yes, Texas could request to be broken up, but congress still needs to okay it.
Now, as to the "right to secede", that bullshit was settled with the Civil War, States do not have the right to secede, not even Texas.
Republicans like to pretend the Civil War never happened, and want a repeat, I guess.
That's true, though to be fair most secessions are illegal and are settled by violence.
My thoughts exactly
Counterpoint: The UK isn't allowed to leave the EU. There's no mechanism.
That's not a counterpoint. The EU is not a country. The EU is an economic and financial understanding between many different countries in order to collaborate on things like currency, trade, tariffs etc. Even if the EU was a country which, I can't stress this enough, it isn't, the EU agreement has clear rules for leaving it. Unlike the US Constitution, which isn't like the EU agreement in very many ways at all.
Having no mechanism and being specifically legislated against are two different things. Brexit is the former, this sounds like the latter.
There's a difference between having no official mechanism, and having the largest military in the world knock on your door to tell you that you can't do something.
If Texas really truly tried to leave the United States, it would be war, and they would not win.
To clarify:
Even if an unambiguous majority of Texas would say "we'd like to turn Texas into an independent country", you'd rather force them to stay by force of arms?
You don't get to steal hundreds of thousands of miles of land from a country and wander off. War would happen. Would I like it? No, war is terrible.
Plus, they wouldn't survive. Let's say we didn't retake our land. The inevitable embargo would destroy them. War is war. Financial war is also kinda war.
A 5-year war wasn't fought in Europe over whether or not the UK was allowed to leave the EU.
And you can smoke pot and get abortions in texas because they’re legal in Illinois. No the US actually has been tested on whether or not states have the right to secede and the answer is no, we had a civil war over it
GOP would not win the presidency for 20 years at least
It would also reduce the number needed to win.
538 EC votes / 2 = 269. 50%+1 for the win so 270.
Texas drops out, so now it goes from 538 to 498. / 2 = 249. 50%+1=250 to win.
And suddenly 270towin.com needs a new CNAME.
Just playing around with what something like that might look like:
Texas is not the swing state...
Yeah, Texas is a reliable GOP vote. Which means losing it would be a massive blow to GOP electoral chances.
Not all of us, just need more of y'all to move here and water down their vote. Problem is the germandering makes populated places less impacting than the uneducated rural areas.
There's enough of us here to do it already, we just need to actually go out and vote and we can win the state-wide and presidential elections here. In 2020 Biden received more votes in Texas than in New York. The metro area populations of Houston, Austin, Dallas, and San Antonio are more than half the state population. If Harris County's efforts to expand mail-in voting (by sending mail-in ballots to all ~2.4M registered voters in the county) Biden may have won the state, as he only lost by ~620k.
I vote every time and post in the Austin community as much as I dare to encourage others. That's about all I can do.
You can volunteer on campaigns! There are roles for people less socially inclined - stuffing mailers and such. Every little bit of help will be welcome.
Gerrymandering has a very limited effect on presidential elections, which is what was mentioned.
Voter suppression and other unequal access to voting make a big difference. For instance, the “one drop off box per county” bs they schemed up, inadequate in-person facilities in urban areas leading to long lines, and how people don’t get voting day off work. Not to mention the fascist chuds planning to stand around with guns at voting facilities to “monitor”.
It still has a big indirect impact. People are less likely to vote if they feel like their vote doesn't matter as much, and someone in a heavily gerrymandered state does in fact have their vote matter less, at least locally. Turnout would probably be measurably higher if the districts were fair or competitive.
There are other indirect effects too - there are plenty of states where Republicans are only able to pass voter-suppressing policies because of the legislative edge they hold thanks to gerrymandering.
That’s why removing it will have such a big impact
Yeah, but a lot of conservatives would probably migrate.
To Texas? Please and thank you! I'd start a GoFundme to help them get their faster.
OMFG I hope they do. They could no longer bus immigrants to other states and would have no other choice but to police their border with Mexico entirely on their own without any federal support. Fucking dumbasses.
we really shouldn't act like Texas was the only one doing that.
It's the only state I've heard of doing it. Were there others? Source?
Florida/DeSantis did it at least once last year. Although Texas was seemingly heavily involved in that too...
One of the top questions asked by Texas residents during their last succession vote was if social security checks were still going to be delivered. I hope they do vote to leave, I want to see the realization sink in and the chaos that ensues.
lmao literal FAFO
It’s like people don’t learn from history and, in these cases, people don’t pay attention to world history/current politics. This would be “Texit” and it would be called that because it rhymes with another vote where the realization of what was happening sunk in after the fact.
I hate this timeline but at least I got to see that the #1 internet search in the UK the next day was "What is Brexit?"
It also rhymes with "tax it." Lol
A Texas independence would not only violate the Constitution, it would sink the GOP in the remaining states due to the loss of Texas' electoral votes, thus ensuring a Republican president would never be elected again. This is the biggest reason Texas will never secede, regardless of the state's conservative nativism.
it would sink the GOP in the remaining states due to the loss of Texas’ electoral votes, thus ensuring a Republican president would never be elected again
So you're saying we should forget the constitution just this once?
I thought this about roe too. Conservatives are really into catching the tire and not knowing what to do afterwards nowadays...
I think part of the reason for this is that the old guard GOP that used Roe and similar issues as the "carrot on a stick" or car to chase, used to have the power to keep it from happening, so they could keep campaigning on it. But the "younger" GOP bought the BS for all those years and now they have the power to catch the car, not realizing it was always just a voter motivational tool, never a real plan. They just saw the old guard GOP as "swamp" that wasn't doing what they campaigned on, and rode the Trump wave into power for themselves, and are there to catch all the carrots.
But they’re republicans. They’ll demand to vote anyway because of some stupid made-up rule like, “Well, we’re touching the rest of the US, so we get to vote!” A /notheonion statement by Cruz if I ever heard one.
I'm always baffled by how people point out succession as illegal as if it's expected or common otherwise that bits of a country can break away whenever they feel like it.
Would an independent Texas care if there was never a Republican president of a country they had left? Or would the see it as just rewards for those that those to stay there?
Without ideological allies running the US, Texas would be very isolated, like Britain after Brexit.
TIL I support succeeding from the US (as long as I can still move there afterwards)
They do this every couple years. It goes nowhere, never will. It's just for show so shitheads can get support from other shitheads
Please, for Christ's sake, just leave. Have the plebiscite. Take it to Congress. Let them release you on the condition that all Americans in Texas be allowed to emigrate, fully compensated, and all wannabe Texans are allowed to immigrate, fully compensated, for the next 6 months.
Oh, and we keep the military equipment. I'm sure their 'well-regulated militia' will be enough for them.
We'll leave it there for convenience when we invade since they will be an unstable oil rich nation in need of freedom.
Ugh, no, let them stay out. We don't need a Resource Trap country to try nation-building on, pretty sure we already tried that one.
Not 80s-90s era 'nation building', 40s era reconstruction. If nazi germany is salvageable we can probably figure texas out with the correct level of commitment.
Sounds like a good way to start getting us off that oil teat to be honest.
Also we'll build a wall at the Texas-US borders, but not because we think it'll be effective, just because it'll be hilarious
ITT: A bunch of people who don't realize Texas is nearly purple, but gerrymandered to hell. There are millions of us who are blue.
Are you looking for credit for almost being a state governed by sane politicians? Almost doesn't count for much against fascism.
Texas is certainly not the only state with this problem but you're also not the only state that's close to giving Republicans the boot. Until it happens the rest of the country has every right to talk trash on the ridiculous bullshit that passes for political discourse there.
People who say stuff like this don't understand how anything works. Sure, talk trash about policies, the GOP and politicians. But it's shitty and counterproductive to say the progressive voters of Texas didn't try hard enough. Why don't the people of North Korea raise up and oust the regime? Would you say it's because North Koreans don't want it bad enough and so they deserve whatever they get?
Deserving and being responsible for are not necessarily the same thing. You can dress it up however you like but at the end of the day it is the citizens of Texas, voters and non-voters alike, that decide the political direction of the state. You may not like it but enough of your neighbors do that it doesn't matter. Deflecting blame and feeling sorry for yourself isn't going to solve that problem.
All the people cheering for Texas to go ahead and leave and fully become an oppressive state and fail, are ignoring that there are plenty of good people in Texas. We shouldn't cheer for those people being harmed.
It seems pretty obvious to me that Republicans aren't going to stop being idiots until their voters get everything they want and realize that it sucks to live that way. It's the job of those good people you referenced to stop that from happening either by educating them or by showing up at the polls in greater numbers. They don't seem to be doing a very good job of either. That is unfortunate for them but it's not everyone else's responsibility to fix that problem. We're not wrong for being annoyed by the consequences of that failure.
Your comment really makes me mad. I urge you to have some compassion for fellow humans. But if that's not enough, how about thinking about your own self preservation:
An oppressive state anywhere is a threat to us all, one on our border even more. When the southern states seceded because they wanted to continue owning slaves, the north didn't say "good riddance, you backward idiots." They also didn't say "Guess you good southerners should have voted harder." They fought a war, because that's a cancer that won't stop at the border.
Now, current Texas isn't comparable to pre civil war Texas. I don't advocate violence. But my point in this thread is to consider that sometimes people through no fault of their own live in a place that has dysfunctional/unsustainable/immoral leadership, and maybe they're not enough of them to seize control, or maybe the system is rigged, or both, and except for luck of birth you could be in the same situation. So maybe worth thinking about how we might help improve those people's situations, or else we or our descendants could be facing the same problems.
Are you looking for credit for almost being a state governed by sane politicians? Almost doesn’t count for much against fascism.
Democrats care about people, unless those people are in red states.
It's a stretch to twist my words in that way but if it makes you feel better about the shitty people you share a state with you go right ahead.
It’s a stretch to twist my words in that way
Not much of one. Look at how much "just fucking leave" sentiment there is in this thread. Not one bit of consideration for the victims of Republican policy, because the victims have committed the sin of being outnumbered. Yeah, we all deserve the results of Republican policy because our misery exists to give you something to look down on.
The only time the national party gives a shit about Texas is when a progressive is running against a centrist in the primaries.
I think it's mostly just the fatigue talking. It's been a long 5/10/20/40 years of almost constant attacks and bullshit. It wears down the compassion.
Texans get the same attacks and bullshit you do. Except we get to be directly impacted by Republican policies and simultaneously blamed for them.
You assume I don't live in a red state
Then you know what it's like.
Wasn't talking about you. Just the idiots proposing it.
Y'know, if Texas secedes, we won't have to change the flag and remove a star if we make Puerto Rico a state. Just sayin'.
Let's make Puerto Rico a state regardless. And D.C.
Agreed! Oh jfc, I keep forgetting D.C. isn't a state.
Do you think the US would leave it's army and it's nukes in a different country just like that? Texas has a fun economy
Then the Republican party would lose a large red state, we would finally be rid of Republican presidents and houses, no more extremist bullshit to deal with.
The US would flourish again and go truly MAGA as it no longer had to deal with the Republican shit.
Texas has shit infrastructure that they don't manage well enough to keep up, it would be a hoot
Texas is home to some of the largest military installations on the planet (Fort Bliss and Fort Cavazos) - the federal economic footprint these (and Lackland, and JSB Carswell and a dozen others) bring to their local economies is massive. Hell, the defense industry footprint in texas is ridiculously large (existing and future helos & fixed wing f22/f35 production) - removing them from Texas would crater their economy.
I tend to look at this like another grift to skin more funds from the stupids.
Yeah, nobody currently in charge would be stoopid enough to do this, but then again each subsequent Republican generation becomes dumber and starts doing the things the previous generation only threatened for money and power. I see them dumb enough to try this 10 years down the road
depressingly plausible, I can't fault your logic.
Joint Base San Antonio is essentially three bases that almost surround most of San Antonio.
As if the feds are just going to walk away from that AND NASA? No way.
New year new secession bill to fail big whoop.
These people killed hundreds because they couldn't keep the lights on. This state would die from people fleeing before the ink dried on the bill even if it passed...
Don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out.
The United States absolutely would not allow Texas to secede.
This is an absurd escalation that is nothing more than theater.
Doesn’t matter, the point is to divide the society.
The irony being the elected officials would be the strongest opponents. Can you imagine Rafeal Cruz willing giving up his power so his constituents could pay less taxes?
I'm not sure Texas is thinking this through. We'd build a wall and make them pay for it...
Oh yes please. The next hurricane that hits we won't have to pay for, and when they freeze or melt because their electrical grid collapses we can just watch.
Texas is one of the few financially functional red states so that wouldn’t be a concern. No clue whether they’d maintain their finances if they seceded.
How financially functional do you think they'll be when they lose all the trade agreements of the US and the ability to freely trade with the other states?
Do they still have lots of oil?
That's a fairly widely traded commodity so probably would help buffer against impacts on other industries of trade instability. Though they might have to consider higher tax on oil or something.
Does Texas have lots of oil, or do oil companies have lots of oil that happens to be located in Texas?
Venezuela has oil. Doesn't make them functional.
I have no clue, and anyone on the internet who says they do is dubious at best. It’s an incredibly complex question.
It didn't go so hot after Brexit, I can't imagine why we should expect Texit to go better.
don't let the door hit you in your racist ass. good luck with that whole electricity thing, we're proud to welcome refugee from The Christian Republic of Trumpistan
Texas was a slave state & fought for the Confederacy. They mustn't secede now for the same reason as back then- they will absolutely terrorize & abuse every minority person they can in that would-be despotic shithole.
If you're going to say "good riddance", look every woman, poor, black, and lgbt person there in the eye as you do, because those are the people you're throwing to the wolves.
Best of luck, turds.
Those idiots can't handle independence.
In tours at the Capitol they brag about how they tried it and they "figured out" that it was a "better deal" for Texas to join the union.
They also brag about building their capitol building "for free" by selling a bunch of unusable territory to a rancher and then regaining it when they gave up or something.
I don't remember the details but the vibe was hilarious.
How about you take everything south of the Mason Dixon line as well...
We here in California would rather not.
3rd time is the charm!
Good luck with that. Yes, one of the major ports in the US is there, lots of military, oil and gas, etc. However, leaving the US, particularly with the local gov having a hard-on for dictatorial bullshit, would basically immediately prove a danger to the US as it could threaten security by (a) having all the left-over military assets but also (b) they could theoretically invite Russia or someone to build a base in Texas and the US will be having none of that. Succession almost certainly means war almost immediately.
I doubt the DoD would just let those assets remain in Texas if the state chooses to secede. They'd likely take it all back, and position it strategically to protect against a now hostile foreign nation.
... at least, that's what I'm hoping for as a piece of "military property".
Please, JFC, don't leave us here!
They'd probably just air drop in, arrest Abbot and the rest of the central government, and declare martial law in Austin. With luck, they'd lock them up and put an appointed governor in his place. There's very little precedent here, so some kind of antebellum south repetition would be likely.
tl;dr, the feds would go full anti terrorist on the idiots in charge of the state.
I love this potential future as well. Texas is saved and Abbott and Friends end up rotting in prison where they belong.
I'd be here for it
The US military would definitely repossess any of their property by force. Anyone who is fighting back is engaging in treason and can receive the death penalty either on the spot or after they are captured. Any resistance is basically a declaration of war. They can never secede peacefully.
Also like you said, all that millitary, oil, and gas
They would be overrun in a day.
Don't wait. Fuck off right now!
My reaction: when Michael Scott finds out that Toby is back, but the exact opposite.
Probably gonna go the same way as what happened with Catalonia, if it gets that far.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Daniel Miller and members of the Texas National Movement delivered 139,456 signatures to the Republican Party headquarters in Austin.
This refers to the most recent Republican gubernatorial primary in 2022 when 1,954,172 votes were cast, electing incumbent State Governor Greg Abbott.
The State Republican Executive Committee was due to decide ballot propositions for March 2024 earlier this month.
Texas has previous when it comes to the idea of secession and it is often mentioned whenever Republican voters become upset over what they see as too much interference from the federal government, usually when there is a Democrat in the Oval Office.
Former Governor Rick Perry joked in 2009 when Barack Obama was president that Texas might consider secession, but also said "we've got a great union."
The Texas Independence Referendum Act, often referred to as "TEXIT," was introduced by then-state representative Bryan Slaton in March this year, but did not get out of its committee stage.
The original article contains 497 words, the summary contains 156 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
They would have 40 electoral college votes in 2024.
If they secede, that would also mean losing 2 Senators and 38 Representatives, changing the balance of power in the House and Senate.
Don't threaten me with a good time!
Edit I also want to see Ted Cruz's face when he learns he's not a Senator anymore because Texas seceded.
He would just move to Florida
Cancun.
Which he thinks is in Florida
Oh no. Democrats would need to find two additional no votes to block anything progressive.
Losing 2 Senators, yes, but the loss of 38 Reps would be temporary. The size of Congress is permanently fixed by legislation to 435, and in the hypothetical case where a state simply goes poof, and 38 Representatives disappear, those seats would be reapportioned to other states after the next Census.
There is precedent for this, when Alaska and Hawaii were added as States, they were each given 1 Representative right away, temporarily increasing the size of Congress to 437, until 2 seats were removed in the next apportionment.
While there is no guarantee on where Texas' seats would go -- it would depend on the next Census after secession -- it is plausible that the new seats would be from less conservative districts than their current makeup.
Speaking of which, we should absolutely do away with that. That is specifically capped just to help Republicans.
Rafeal Cruz. We must respect this man's choice to only recognize the name on the birth certificate
Cruz would finally have a shot at becoming a president.
So nowhere in the article is it mentioned that the supposed "Texas right to secede" is actually bullshit, and a complete misunderstanding of the actual right that they have, which is to be broken up into five separate states.
Except even that is bullshit, because it was talking about the Texas Territory, which was larger than modern day Texas.
The constitution clearly says that;
So yes, Texas could request to be broken up, but congress still needs to okay it.
Now, as to the "right to secede", that bullshit was settled with the Civil War, States do not have the right to secede, not even Texas.
Republicans like to pretend the Civil War never happened, and want a repeat, I guess.
That's true, though to be fair most secessions are illegal and are settled by violence.
My thoughts exactly
Counterpoint: The UK isn't allowed to leave the EU. There's no mechanism.
That's not a counterpoint. The EU is not a country. The EU is an economic and financial understanding between many different countries in order to collaborate on things like currency, trade, tariffs etc. Even if the EU was a country which, I can't stress this enough, it isn't, the EU agreement has clear rules for leaving it. Unlike the US Constitution, which isn't like the EU agreement in very many ways at all.
Having no mechanism and being specifically legislated against are two different things. Brexit is the former, this sounds like the latter.
There's a difference between having no official mechanism, and having the largest military in the world knock on your door to tell you that you can't do something.
If Texas really truly tried to leave the United States, it would be war, and they would not win.
To clarify:
Even if an unambiguous majority of Texas would say "we'd like to turn Texas into an independent country", you'd rather force them to stay by force of arms?
You don't get to steal hundreds of thousands of miles of land from a country and wander off. War would happen. Would I like it? No, war is terrible.
Plus, they wouldn't survive. Let's say we didn't retake our land. The inevitable embargo would destroy them. War is war. Financial war is also kinda war.
Yes absolutely. Just like in the Civil War, which I am also glad we won.
A 5-year war wasn't fought in Europe over whether or not the UK was allowed to leave the EU.
And you can smoke pot and get abortions in texas because they’re legal in Illinois. No the US actually has been tested on whether or not states have the right to secede and the answer is no, we had a civil war over it
lol. Please 🙏
GOP would not win the presidency for 20 years at least
It would also reduce the number needed to win.
538 EC votes / 2 = 269. 50%+1 for the win so 270.
Texas drops out, so now it goes from 538 to 498. / 2 = 249. 50%+1=250 to win.
And suddenly 270towin.com needs a new CNAME.
Just playing around with what something like that might look like:
Texas is not the swing state...
Yeah, Texas is a reliable GOP vote. Which means losing it would be a massive blow to GOP electoral chances.
Not all of us, just need more of y'all to move here and water down their vote. Problem is the germandering makes populated places less impacting than the uneducated rural areas.
There's enough of us here to do it already, we just need to actually go out and vote and we can win the state-wide and presidential elections here. In 2020 Biden received more votes in Texas than in New York. The metro area populations of Houston, Austin, Dallas, and San Antonio are more than half the state population. If Harris County's efforts to expand mail-in voting (by sending mail-in ballots to all ~2.4M registered voters in the county) Biden may have won the state, as he only lost by ~620k.
I vote every time and post in the Austin community as much as I dare to encourage others. That's about all I can do.
You can volunteer on campaigns! There are roles for people less socially inclined - stuffing mailers and such. Every little bit of help will be welcome.
Gerrymandering has a very limited effect on presidential elections, which is what was mentioned.
Voter suppression and other unequal access to voting make a big difference. For instance, the “one drop off box per county” bs they schemed up, inadequate in-person facilities in urban areas leading to long lines, and how people don’t get voting day off work. Not to mention the fascist chuds planning to stand around with guns at voting facilities to “monitor”.
It still has a big indirect impact. People are less likely to vote if they feel like their vote doesn't matter as much, and someone in a heavily gerrymandered state does in fact have their vote matter less, at least locally. Turnout would probably be measurably higher if the districts were fair or competitive.
There are other indirect effects too - there are plenty of states where Republicans are only able to pass voter-suppressing policies because of the legislative edge they hold thanks to gerrymandering.
That’s why removing it will have such a big impact
Yeah, but a lot of conservatives would probably migrate.
To Texas? Please and thank you! I'd start a GoFundme to help them get their faster.
OMFG I hope they do. They could no longer bus immigrants to other states and would have no other choice but to police their border with Mexico entirely on their own without any federal support. Fucking dumbasses.
we really shouldn't act like Texas was the only one doing that.
It's the only state I've heard of doing it. Were there others? Source?
Florida/DeSantis did it at least once last year. Although Texas was seemingly heavily involved in that too...
One of the top questions asked by Texas residents during their last succession vote was if social security checks were still going to be delivered. I hope they do vote to leave, I want to see the realization sink in and the chaos that ensues.
lmao literal FAFO
It’s like people don’t learn from history and, in these cases, people don’t pay attention to world history/current politics. This would be “Texit” and it would be called that because it rhymes with another vote where the realization of what was happening sunk in after the fact.
I hate this timeline but at least I got to see that the #1 internet search in the UK the next day was "What is Brexit?"
It also rhymes with "tax it." Lol
A Texas independence would not only violate the Constitution, it would sink the GOP in the remaining states due to the loss of Texas' electoral votes, thus ensuring a Republican president would never be elected again. This is the biggest reason Texas will never secede, regardless of the state's conservative nativism.
So you're saying we should forget the constitution just this once?
I thought this about roe too. Conservatives are really into catching the tire and not knowing what to do afterwards nowadays...
I think part of the reason for this is that the old guard GOP that used Roe and similar issues as the "carrot on a stick" or car to chase, used to have the power to keep it from happening, so they could keep campaigning on it. But the "younger" GOP bought the BS for all those years and now they have the power to catch the car, not realizing it was always just a voter motivational tool, never a real plan. They just saw the old guard GOP as "swamp" that wasn't doing what they campaigned on, and rode the Trump wave into power for themselves, and are there to catch all the carrots.
But they’re republicans. They’ll demand to vote anyway because of some stupid made-up rule like, “Well, we’re touching the rest of the US, so we get to vote!” A /notheonion statement by Cruz if I ever heard one.
I'm always baffled by how people point out succession as illegal as if it's expected or common otherwise that bits of a country can break away whenever they feel like it.
Would an independent Texas care if there was never a Republican president of a country they had left? Or would the see it as just rewards for those that those to stay there?
Without ideological allies running the US, Texas would be very isolated, like Britain after Brexit.
TIL I support succeeding from the US (as long as I can still move there afterwards)
They do this every couple years. It goes nowhere, never will. It's just for show so shitheads can get support from other shitheads
Please, for Christ's sake, just leave. Have the plebiscite. Take it to Congress. Let them release you on the condition that all Americans in Texas be allowed to emigrate, fully compensated, and all wannabe Texans are allowed to immigrate, fully compensated, for the next 6 months.
Oh, and we keep the military equipment. I'm sure their 'well-regulated militia' will be enough for them.
We'll leave it there for convenience when we invade since they will be an unstable oil rich nation in need of freedom.
Ugh, no, let them stay out. We don't need a Resource Trap country to try nation-building on, pretty sure we already tried that one.
Not 80s-90s era 'nation building', 40s era reconstruction. If nazi germany is salvageable we can probably figure texas out with the correct level of commitment.
Sounds like a good way to start getting us off that oil teat to be honest.
Also we'll build a wall at the Texas-US borders, but not because we think it'll be effective, just because it'll be hilariousITT: A bunch of people who don't realize Texas is nearly purple, but gerrymandered to hell. There are millions of us who are blue.
Are you looking for credit for almost being a state governed by sane politicians? Almost doesn't count for much against fascism.
Texas is certainly not the only state with this problem but you're also not the only state that's close to giving Republicans the boot. Until it happens the rest of the country has every right to talk trash on the ridiculous bullshit that passes for political discourse there.
People who say stuff like this don't understand how anything works. Sure, talk trash about policies, the GOP and politicians. But it's shitty and counterproductive to say the progressive voters of Texas didn't try hard enough. Why don't the people of North Korea raise up and oust the regime? Would you say it's because North Koreans don't want it bad enough and so they deserve whatever they get?
Deserving and being responsible for are not necessarily the same thing. You can dress it up however you like but at the end of the day it is the citizens of Texas, voters and non-voters alike, that decide the political direction of the state. You may not like it but enough of your neighbors do that it doesn't matter. Deflecting blame and feeling sorry for yourself isn't going to solve that problem.
All the people cheering for Texas to go ahead and leave and fully become an oppressive state and fail, are ignoring that there are plenty of good people in Texas. We shouldn't cheer for those people being harmed.
It seems pretty obvious to me that Republicans aren't going to stop being idiots until their voters get everything they want and realize that it sucks to live that way. It's the job of those good people you referenced to stop that from happening either by educating them or by showing up at the polls in greater numbers. They don't seem to be doing a very good job of either. That is unfortunate for them but it's not everyone else's responsibility to fix that problem. We're not wrong for being annoyed by the consequences of that failure.
Your comment really makes me mad. I urge you to have some compassion for fellow humans. But if that's not enough, how about thinking about your own self preservation:
An oppressive state anywhere is a threat to us all, one on our border even more. When the southern states seceded because they wanted to continue owning slaves, the north didn't say "good riddance, you backward idiots." They also didn't say "Guess you good southerners should have voted harder." They fought a war, because that's a cancer that won't stop at the border.
Now, current Texas isn't comparable to pre civil war Texas. I don't advocate violence. But my point in this thread is to consider that sometimes people through no fault of their own live in a place that has dysfunctional/unsustainable/immoral leadership, and maybe they're not enough of them to seize control, or maybe the system is rigged, or both, and except for luck of birth you could be in the same situation. So maybe worth thinking about how we might help improve those people's situations, or else we or our descendants could be facing the same problems.
Democrats care about people, unless those people are in red states.
It's a stretch to twist my words in that way but if it makes you feel better about the shitty people you share a state with you go right ahead.
Not much of one. Look at how much "just fucking leave" sentiment there is in this thread. Not one bit of consideration for the victims of Republican policy, because the victims have committed the sin of being outnumbered. Yeah, we all deserve the results of Republican policy because our misery exists to give you something to look down on.
The only time the national party gives a shit about Texas is when a progressive is running against a centrist in the primaries.
I think it's mostly just the fatigue talking. It's been a long 5/10/20/40 years of almost constant attacks and bullshit. It wears down the compassion.
Texans get the same attacks and bullshit you do. Except we get to be directly impacted by Republican policies and simultaneously blamed for them.
You assume I don't live in a red state
Then you know what it's like.
Wasn't talking about you. Just the idiots proposing it.
Y'know, if Texas secedes, we won't have to change the flag and remove a star if we make Puerto Rico a state. Just sayin'.
Let's make Puerto Rico a state regardless. And D.C.
Agreed! Oh jfc, I keep forgetting D.C. isn't a state.
I'd love to see that happen.
Do you think the US would leave it's army and it's nukes in a different country just like that? Texas has a fun economy
Then the Republican party would lose a large red state, we would finally be rid of Republican presidents and houses, no more extremist bullshit to deal with.
The US would flourish again and go truly MAGA as it no longer had to deal with the Republican shit.
Texas has shit infrastructure that they don't manage well enough to keep up, it would be a hoot
Texas is home to some of the largest military installations on the planet (Fort Bliss and Fort Cavazos) - the federal economic footprint these (and Lackland, and JSB Carswell and a dozen others) bring to their local economies is massive. Hell, the defense industry footprint in texas is ridiculously large (existing and future helos & fixed wing f22/f35 production) - removing them from Texas would crater their economy.
I tend to look at this like another grift to skin more funds from the stupids.
Yeah, nobody currently in charge would be stoopid enough to do this, but then again each subsequent Republican generation becomes dumber and starts doing the things the previous generation only threatened for money and power. I see them dumb enough to try this 10 years down the road
depressingly plausible, I can't fault your logic.
Joint Base San Antonio is essentially three bases that almost surround most of San Antonio.
As if the feds are just going to walk away from that AND NASA? No way.
New year new secession bill to fail big whoop.
These people killed hundreds because they couldn't keep the lights on. This state would die from people fleeing before the ink dried on the bill even if it passed...
Don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out.
The United States absolutely would not allow Texas to secede.
This is an absurd escalation that is nothing more than theater.
Doesn’t matter, the point is to divide the society.
The irony being the elected officials would be the strongest opponents. Can you imagine Rafeal Cruz willing giving up his power so his constituents could pay less taxes?
I'm not sure Texas is thinking this through. We'd build a wall and make them pay for it...
Oh yes please. The next hurricane that hits we won't have to pay for, and when they freeze or melt because their electrical grid collapses we can just watch.
Texas is one of the few financially functional red states so that wouldn’t be a concern. No clue whether they’d maintain their finances if they seceded.
How financially functional do you think they'll be when they lose all the trade agreements of the US and the ability to freely trade with the other states?
Do they still have lots of oil?
That's a fairly widely traded commodity so probably would help buffer against impacts on other industries of trade instability. Though they might have to consider higher tax on oil or something.
Does Texas have lots of oil, or do oil companies have lots of oil that happens to be located in Texas?
Venezuela has oil. Doesn't make them functional.
I have no clue, and anyone on the internet who says they do is dubious at best. It’s an incredibly complex question.
It didn't go so hot after Brexit, I can't imagine why we should expect Texit to go better.
don't let the door hit you in your racist ass. good luck with that whole electricity thing, we're proud to welcome refugee from The Christian Republic of Trumpistan
Texas was a slave state & fought for the Confederacy. They mustn't secede now for the same reason as back then- they will absolutely terrorize & abuse every minority person they can in that would-be despotic shithole.
If you're going to say "good riddance", look every woman, poor, black, and lgbt person there in the eye as you do, because those are the people you're throwing to the wolves.
Best of luck, turds.
Those idiots can't handle independence.
In tours at the Capitol they brag about how they tried it and they "figured out" that it was a "better deal" for Texas to join the union.
They also brag about building their capitol building "for free" by selling a bunch of unusable territory to a rancher and then regaining it when they gave up or something.
I don't remember the details but the vibe was hilarious.
if I had the money to leave here I would
How about you take everything south of the Mason Dixon line as well...
We here in California would rather not.
3rd time is the charm!
Good luck with that. Yes, one of the major ports in the US is there, lots of military, oil and gas, etc. However, leaving the US, particularly with the local gov having a hard-on for dictatorial bullshit, would basically immediately prove a danger to the US as it could threaten security by (a) having all the left-over military assets but also (b) they could theoretically invite Russia or someone to build a base in Texas and the US will be having none of that. Succession almost certainly means war almost immediately.
I doubt the DoD would just let those assets remain in Texas if the state chooses to secede. They'd likely take it all back, and position it strategically to protect against a now hostile foreign nation.
... at least, that's what I'm hoping for as a piece of "military property".
Please, JFC, don't leave us here!
They'd probably just air drop in, arrest Abbot and the rest of the central government, and declare martial law in Austin. With luck, they'd lock them up and put an appointed governor in his place. There's very little precedent here, so some kind of antebellum south repetition would be likely.
tl;dr, the feds would go full anti terrorist on the idiots in charge of the state.
I love this potential future as well. Texas is saved and Abbott and Friends end up rotting in prison where they belong.
I'd be here for it
The US military would definitely repossess any of their property by force. Anyone who is fighting back is engaging in treason and can receive the death penalty either on the spot or after they are captured. Any resistance is basically a declaration of war. They can never secede peacefully.
Also like you said, all that millitary, oil, and gas
They would be overrun in a day.
Don't wait. Fuck off right now!
My reaction: when Michael Scott finds out that Toby is back, but the exact opposite.
Probably gonna go the same way as what happened with Catalonia, if it gets that far.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Daniel Miller and members of the Texas National Movement delivered 139,456 signatures to the Republican Party headquarters in Austin.
This refers to the most recent Republican gubernatorial primary in 2022 when 1,954,172 votes were cast, electing incumbent State Governor Greg Abbott.
The State Republican Executive Committee was due to decide ballot propositions for March 2024 earlier this month.
Texas has previous when it comes to the idea of secession and it is often mentioned whenever Republican voters become upset over what they see as too much interference from the federal government, usually when there is a Democrat in the Oval Office.
Former Governor Rick Perry joked in 2009 when Barack Obama was president that Texas might consider secession, but also said "we've got a great union."
The Texas Independence Referendum Act, often referred to as "TEXIT," was introduced by then-state representative Bryan Slaton in March this year, but did not get out of its committee stage.
The original article contains 497 words, the summary contains 156 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!