Elon Musk takes @America handle from X user to promote Donald Trump
X owner Elon Musk has once again hijacked a rare coveted username from its original user.
This time, however, the takeover wasn’t for the good of X the company, it was so Musk could promote Donald Trump for president.
On Saturday, Musk appeared at Donald Trump’s rally in Butler Pennsylvania. However, earlier that day, Musk began promoting his pro-Trump Super PAC, called America PAC, using a brand new handle @America.
“Read @America to understand why I’m supporting Trump for President,” Musk’s new bio said as of approximately 1:30pm ET on Saturday, Oct. 5.
The @America handle appeared attached to a brand new account setup just this month, in October 2024. However, this rare, one-word geographic handle had already been long registered by another X user more than 14 years prior to Musk taking the handle from them, in September 2010.
According to a person familiar with the situation, X took the handle from the user much like how Musk’s social media company took the @X handle from its original registrant last year.
I’m not interested in what a drug-addled white supremacist has to say. I’m not allowed to use edibles on my days off because it can put my job at risk but this piece-of-shit uses ketamine, acid, shrooms and cocaine and is still allowed to have expensive government contracts.
I don't get how anyone can Take Acid and stay a fascist. It creates the quite opposite feelings to hate.
Same situation with Joe Rogan. He’s a giant pothead but gets to use in Texas which has some of the strictest regulations in the country.
Some of those drugs will change your brain chemistry permanently or rewire it. They can even make you paranoid and start to believe weird conspiracies.
The Manson effect.
I used to think this until I met an acidhead who would dose every weekend. Most racist person I've ever met and, if anything, the acid made him more racist.
Because they think they can control him. Possibly why he’s so hell bent on this now too. It would explain some things. But he’s still a piece of shit no matter what. 🙃
Well, you could move to a less shitty state.
It doesn’t matter for the line of work I’m in until it is legalized federally.
After this, I don't know what more proof anyone could possibly need that Xitter is purely a right-wing propaganda platform exactly equivalent to the likes of Truth [sic] Social. Anyone who continues to use Xitter supports this behavior. Continued use of accounts like @POTUS or @KamalaHarris or these is effectively an endorsement of equating Donald Trump with America. It has to stop! The platform has to be fully abandoned by every single person, organization, or government entity that isn't fascist; there is no choice now.
If you're still on Xitter at this point, you deserve all the bullshit you get. That place is a cesspool. You can't swim in the toilet and then pretend to be mad you're covered in shit.
This sends a clear message: if you still have a valuable handle, sell it now.
This is one of the best quotes I've ever heard. Definitely made my day.
The Other Truth Social.
Well, the account was allegedly inactive. Sounds like they weren't on Twitter either.
yeah, don't know why they're so mad. 90% of people don't know what lemmy even is, much less mastodon. And those numbers are very generous considering there are ~40k people using lemmy
Anyone still in Twitter is a clown. It's not different from being on Truth Social.
Indeed. I feel sorry for those people that feel compelled to still be on it for their jobs, or for their side-hustle/main-hustle or whatever, but yeah, anyone still on there just because? I have no idea, unless they are Nazis or Nazi adjacent.
Stealing @America sounds about right up his alley. Just like T Daddy.
This is probably the most American thing elon has ever accomplished; taking something that isn't theirs and using it to hurl feces.
Yea. You would never see that in [insert name of literally any country]
/s
I don't know why you're being downvoted, you're right.
Imagine a world where this shit was illegal
Imagine a world where this shit was irrelevant.
It'd be a weird world unless X/Twitter was government run. But at some point we're going to hit the mother of all lawsuits... email is a standard communication medium for folks and lots of people still, and have forever, used @ hotmail, yahoo or gmail addresses.
It will be really fucking interesting the first time one of those companies seizes an address and diverts some critical notification.
I can't wait until Trump loses interest in Musk.
I hope it's the final push over the edge Musk needs.
Could you imagine come November trump loses and musk just shots himself to Mars for forever. What a good day that'll be.
Four words too many on that first sentence.
At this point though, I have a sinking suspicion that Trump is going to win. I hope I'm wrong but I'm in a swing state and it feels more like 2016 than 2020 to me. America is full of ignorant people who are too prideful to realize how absolutely ignorant they are.
Naw it feels like a mix of 16 and 08. Theres so much energy around harris, but its bogged down by all the hate from trump. But im older, Obama was elected when i was in high school amd thats when i started paying attention to politics
Older than me? I've got probably a decade on you. My first (major) political awareness involves blowjobs and dress stains. I vaguely recall Iraq Part 1 and the excitement around it being televised live.
My abandoned Reddit account is older than some of the people I interact with on here.
I hope you're right. As with all the recent elections where the Democratic Party wins, it's all down to the youth vote. Also, really hopefully this one has even more extra support from the uterus carrying people amongst us than anticipated by the polls.
It comes down to people in 7 states. And after seeing interviews with some swing voters, they aren’t deep thinkers.
We’re fucked and i’m currently making my escape plan.
Do you not feel the change approach? She hasnt come out and used Obama's exact phrasing, but it feels like shes going to bring some change that we desperately need.
Her bringing on Tim Walz keeps that hope alive for me. Like even if she somehow disappoints me, there will be Walz who can inject some "mind your own business" socialism at the national stage. I wish he would have more faith in his own speaking abilities though.
I have no issues with her. And I think she will be a better leader than we've had in a while. Possible bette than Obama who seemed too afraid to be bold in his actions.
But the news cycles are all about Trump and I know people who still plan to vote for him and the polls are still awfully close that it could easily swing either way.
I feel like I am stuck in a political demographic where I am the outlier. It sounds like the view might be better from where you stand.
to the one place wokeism has not corrupted ... SPACE~
Not until he has no billions left, like Mike pillow.
Musk Pillow has a nice ring to it. He's going to do a lot of harm to good tech when he really crashes out after Trump loses.
Nah, Trump will put Musk on his cabinet, possibly Secretary of Transportation. Which is ironic that Musk has an electric car company but the GOP is all about fossil fuel. We've seen gas guzzling pick ups block multiple super chargers to fuck with Tesla owners.
How many people in Trump's cabinet lasted the whole term?
The only one I recall was Betsy DeVos.
Nope. She left 12 days early because of January 6th.
Just didn't quite make it.
And that was because she gave him tons of money.
There will be no caninet to put him on.
Some personal physician will OD him on Special-K because he got tired of his shit.
I'll donate $5 to their go-fund-me defense.
What a fucking loser honestly
Fully weaponizing "his platform" to influence the election. Painting a target on his back, making more enemies by the day. (Only this time, it's not just his drug-induced paranoia.) Gambling everything, once again. Accidentally buying "the town square" was his biggest mistake.
Musk is so disgusting.
Can we establish "dismusking" as a new word that means "extremely disgusting"?
"Let me tell you why I claim to support trump."
The real reasons would never be spoken aloud.
Musk is a moron. So.
I wouldn’t take that bet. Even if ordinarily you’d be right.
See you don't get it, it's totally fine for musk to take the @America tag and push Twitter for Trump. Twitter was SUPER biased before because you couldn't say the N-word whenever you want. It's not biased at all now because it's completely far right which is obviously the Correct Way to Be™ so it can't be biased.
-dipshits
Honest question from a non-American.
If Trump loses, how much of a case does Harris have of going after Musk for interfering in an election?
Probably very little.
I'm not up to speed on what Twitter is doing these days outside of what's reported here on lemmy.
Unless Musk starts saying things like "Polls are closing early so don't bother voting because Trump won" or things that will suppress votes, his actions and tweets are going to be categorized as political free speech, which has broad interpretation in the US. Sad, but true.
We, as well as our government officials, should remember that Twitter is not the public town square. It's a dumpster fire that is owned by a private entity that permits users to throw their shit into. That private entity is within their right to do whatever they want within the confines of the law.
You mean like his mother telling people to go vote 10 times with 10 fake names?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC
It is unbelievable to me how everyone is just walzing past the fact that a super-pac organizer attended a rally with the candidate.
My knowledge on this topic is very minimal, but is it because the SuperPAC isn't supposed to be coordinating with either party?
52 USC 30118: Contributions or expenditures by national banks, corporations, or labor organizations
Text contains those laws in effect on October 6, 2024
It's one of the few threads of campaign finance law that still exist. Things to keep in mind, in-kind contributions are still contributions. An example would be, directing your private business that is in no way affiliated with your super PAC to promote and fundraise for the candidate that you are standing on stage at a rally with. If that isn't "in connection with" then I don't know what is.
If you make the connection that Elon being there is also "in connection with" then wouldn't that now spill over with Elon acting as the head of twitter, confiscating the @America handle to give to the SuperPAC to promote Trump? One links the other?
In which case Twitter is now providing an in kind contribution?
Assuming that is a problem, then the only way it wouldn't be is if the SuperPAC itself paid the original holder of @America to sell it to them and then Twitter did the hand over at both parties request?
This is of course subject to whatever SCOTUS sock puppet Alito has his ghostly hand up the ass of, but the way it was intended to work was that super pacs can receive and spend limitlessly so long as there is no coordination with the candidate. Elon can't call trump and ask what trump would like the pac to do. So Elon being a right wing shit head is legal all day, so long as he doesn't do any of his right wing shit headery in connection with trump.
And yes, that would usually imply that if there is coordination then all contributions, even those in kind, are campaign contributions and must be regulated and disclosed. Which they aren't. And probably won't be. But if this case comes up in a few years, the right wing shit head chorus will cry alligator tears about the poor oppressed witch-hunted trump. FML.
I'm more worried about election officials getting star treatment at a candidate's rallies.
I don't think she'll have to. MAGA will implode along with Truth Social, Twitter, and maybe even Tesla as I'm sure Elon has turned off many potential buyers just as competing car companies are getting closer in value as Tesla.
None.
Private citizens and companies can endorse whoever they want.
None, because there isn't even a pretension of justice under fascism.
how is this election interference, it isn't forcing anyone to vote a particular way, nor is it manipulating ballots?
Look who really owns Twitter. It's the people who loaned Musk money for his buyout.
Who is top of that list? Saudi Arabia.
And now Twitter is fully in service to the Republican party? Sounds like foreign electoral intervention to me...
why shouldn't Saudi Arabia be able to endorse and support a US political candidate?
Can Americans become media-literate quickly? That question could determine the election
Half of Americans are barely literate at all, forget media-literate.
How long before Musk/Trump merges Twitter and Truth? They're basically the same place at this point.
My 🔮 says they will someday pitch investors on federating with Blue Sky, after which they will discover no one wants their content.
What an absolute shameless piece of shit.
I don’t need to read @America to know why you support Trump. We all know. All of us know Elon.
I was able to shorten the original 4,204-character article to this 140-character summary:
You forgot the part about Elon fornicating with a tapir. Pretty critical piece of the story to exclude.
Didn’t seem critical to the core narrative. The tapir was fully sober and in heat so I don’t really see how it relates.
You are, in fact, correct. My heavens. The lack of journalistic integrity these days must’ve seriously damaged my ability to isolate important news from tabloid trash. I don’t know what’s gotten into me.
Folks, I admit fault. I’ll leave Elon & his tapir to their business.
For some reason I read tapeworm and now I'm not sure what's worse.
Vote for Trump so I won't lose my captive market 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ah ok so this is what the right meant when they say "Take America Back*
Maybe they'll all go home now. Mission complete.
You can't beat musk on his own platform, it's long since time to use a big boy one.
But MAH FREEZED PEACH! The world's town square, argle bargle....
-Any given Crazy Uncle Liberty, probably.
Do Twitter usernames have value? Could this be considered a massive in kind campaign contribution?
I would argue if the users don't hold value, and the content is made by the uses, the company would need a re-evaluation of near zero value. Then again .. Lemmy has no value to usernames. As you and I can have the same username, as we are on different instances. But that is attached to the idea of disenfranchising the value behind the instance ownership.
Even if they did, Musk gave it to his own PAC, not the Trump campaign.
I really don’t think Trump’s dick can go any further into Musk’s mouth
Sure it sucks, but it can't be a surprise anymore.
The username @X was also taken from a user. Same with @Music, who if I recall correctly, was a fan of Musk and was even subscribing to Twitter at the time. They even continued to do what @Music was doing with music recommendations, so it was barely a rebrand. It was basically just hijacking the work someone else put into establishing their social media presence.
I can't believe I'm saying this, but... this isn't quite as bad as it looks.
Agreed, but I mean has been the general theme with the new owner. Everything could have been handled better, but nothing was.
Another reason why the fediverse is better. We have better control over this, simply by owning our own instances. Then admins on another instance can't simply seize our usernames.
So basically they released a handle that otherwise wasn't going to be used and would have gone to waste.
It would be better if they had a general policy about these things .. but considering the owner...
Less good as the user was actively using it beforehand but the justification is also stronger in this case.
It just shows what a bunch of lowly thieves this bunch is.
I'm all for hating on musk/trump. But do we know if he actually stole the handle/tag or if he paid an obscene amount of money to the original owner?
I hate Twitter and deleted my account a long time ago but facts matter and assuming he stole the tag is just as bad as what he is doing. We may never know what actually happened but I'm curious
The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support