Do you prefer digital or physical books?

JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml – 96 points –
124

I do prefer reading physical books, but I almost exclusively read on my ereader because of easy availability of whatever I want, and it doesn't take up tons of space like books do.

Yeah pretty much my thinking as well. Almost all my physical books are in a box in a wardrobe cause I have nowhere else to put them. It's a sad state to end in for a piece of literature, isn't it?

Give them away! I have a bunch of books on my shelf, my friend asked me, “how many of those have you even read?” And I said, probably around half of them. He scoffed. As if I were just buying books…for the look? I dunno. But all of my previously read books get “loaned out” and never return. Which is fine! Plenty of people have lent me books that I never returned. It’s the circle of life.

My whole family has tried getting me on e-readers because I’ve always been the reader of the family, but…I read a few books on it and then never used it again. It was fine, but I love my physical books. When I was traveling overseas for a few years, I had like six books in my bag. Which, yeah, maybe an e-reader would’ve been smarter at that point, but every single book I was reading I gave to someone to enjoy when I finished. And people gave me books when I finished mine! It’s such a great system. I also love shopping for used books…that part may be a bit of an addiction lol

Actually, it's a great suggestion. However that small box I'm left with is that post-donation elite group, the ones that have sentimental value. I haven't bought physical books in years, I borrow at the library. I don't read fiction nearly as much as I used to, sadly... Teenage me, who read anywhere from 1-3 novels a week, would be ashamed.

Edit: Now that I think of it, I do have some books that are loaners and others I've loaned and never saw again. My copy of The Hobbit was my godfather's when he was in university.

Compared to my kindle, I hate real books. No worries about lighting. Page always flat. Lighter. Never lose what page you're on. Less space and hundreds of books can be kept right there. Still looks like real paper. Font and size to your own preference.

There's really no downside at all for me. I never cared how a book "smelled". That's for sure.

If you have an ereader with an eink screen... it's a no-brainer. Digital books are soooo good.

  • virtually no weight
  • virtually no space
  • waaaaay cheaper
  • your local library has probably a way bigger and more accessible catalogue of ebooks than physical ones
  • tap and hold a word and get an automatic definition/translation
  • adjust text size or font
  • dark mode, if you into that (in some models)
  • Text-to-speech (in some models)
  • highlight text and write notes without f-ing up pages
  • literally translate entire phrases or look particular information from Wikipedia or similar with a simple gesture.
  • backup all of those and do crazy stuff like an automatic daily email to yourself with cool notes you took months/years ago.

Physical books nowadays are like vynil music... it's for the artwork and having a physical "certificate" of something you love. Like... if I discover a book I really enjoy, I'll probably buy a physical version so I can, you know, have it there on the shelf, like you have family pics or something.

Just got a kobo libra 2 a couple of weeks ago and I'm loving it. You forgot to mention the dictionary native to most e-readers too!

I’ve been eying up this one. Have you used other ereaders before? Have you got anything to compare it to?

I hear that having a screen that isn’t flush with the touch surface really improves the word clarity. I’m not really enjoying my paperwhite 5 because it’s has a weird blurred effect on the screen because it’s flush

This was my first e-reader, but I played around with my mom's Paperwhite 5 for a bit before deciding against it. The UI on the paperwhite is better but you don't really interact with it much for it to be a big problem. I also patched mine using calibre to add some features that aren't present on the stock UI. I'm not sure about the particulars with the display but text and images are fairly crisp. All in all, I'm pretty happy with it

Being able to carry my entire collection with me is incredible. Before I'd have to select a few to bring on vacation or when visiting relatives.

I dunno about the vinyl parallel. I’m a physical book reader myself—I’ve tried an ebook, I read a few books on there. But it didn’t hold me the way books know how to. Just right.

Not to mention, I’m trying everything I can to realistically separate myself from the “internet of things.” I use the internet, but I try to achieve as private of an experience as I can manage. I’m wary of cameras these days. I never used social media. I cover any camera pointed at me that I can…my point is, a book doesn’t know I’m reading it or how long I’ve read it. Buying used books, no one knows who I am, how long I’ve spent reading, WHAT I’m reading, etc.

I can’t say the same about these e-readers. I don’t need ANOTHER device I’m constantly worried is stealing every single metric it can possibly gather about me.

Depends. Digital is usually best for me since I can read on my phone pretty much anytime anywhere.

That said, some books feel like they work best in your hand, like The Book of Disquiet, which has so many notes at the end and I haven't found a comfortable enough way to skip back on forth without having to scroll through a lot to get to where I was, or House of Leaves, which is more like a fun hands-on puzzle to play with.

House of Leaves is a wild experience in the new(ish) full-color print.

I never did finish it because it's such an endeavor. You really have to commit to it.

I think e-ink readers are incredible. My eyes feel like they're reading a normal book, but it's got a backlight, doesn't take up a bunch of physical space I don't have, and it's a lot easier to read using only one hand at a time (even turning pages).

  • The <1% of books I love: physical
  • The >99% of everything else: digital

I think I overall prefer digital, but on e-ink devices mostly.

I like that they don't take up space, I can download them quickly and not have to go to the bookstore or order it online and wait for it to be delivered. Also I can sync it on multiple devices and read on my kindle when I really want to have a good reading experience but if I forget it or am waiting for the bus or something, just pull up the kindle app on my phone and everything is synced.

On the other hand, growing up with a lot of books I kinda miss the feel and smell of physical books. Also I feel like they are a bit more... "permanent".

I used to prefer physical, because I read on my phone and never really paid attention. Used my phone to read for a year and read a ton of books but don't remember any of them. Couple years ago I bought a kindle and ever since I haven't bought a single physical book, opting to buy them instead through amazon.

Don't think I'll ever go back to physical, honestly, it's just too convenient. Digital is less bulky, not just in storage but in my hands, pages don't wear down from turning, and I can fit my kindle in my front pockets and read anywhere, any time.

I dislike having to give money to amazon though.

Kobo! Kobo is owned by Rakuten and they integrate with public libraries too.

2nd for Kobo! It's a good device, supports more standards, and doesn't fund any of the Too Big Tech Giants

Ooo, these look cool. Won't be able to access those libraries, but this seems like a good option, thanks!

Just in case you didn't know, you don't have to buy books through Amazon (actually that's the worst option). You can buy the books in epub format from the publishers website or other stores usually (and if all else fails, pirate it in epub format). Epub is DRM free, which means you actually own the book, and, although I wouldn't have recommended buying an Amazon Kindle, now you have it, according to another commenter, you can email the epub to yourself and read it on the kindle.

Oh yeah, I've pirated stuff before. WotC stuff though, no way I'm giving them money for handbooks.

I prefer physical. But my shelves were full and the wood groaning. I use a kindle these days.

you can get ebooks for free without a library

I reluctantly started reading ebooks years ago for a very practical reason: owning some few thousand physical books, I pretty much ran out of room in the shelves in my small apartment. So nowadays I only buy physical art books and the like. Having said this, I actually easily grew to like ebooks, for their ubiquitous availability and, of course, not taking up precious shelf space.

Have to read them in an ereader for a proper experience, though. Tablet/smartphone displays tire my eyes a lot if I read for any meaningful period of time.

I've heard from an optometrist that Amazon paperlites solve the eye strain issue. Specfically asking "Why do you hate your eyes?" when I told him I read via a tablet.

The only downside is giving Amazon money...

Kobo ereaders work just as well and you can bring your own books.

I have a Kobo, and it's fucking sweet. You don't even need EPUB format; Kobos read plain fucking text.

Both. I prefer digital generally because I'm a digital hoarder and I love seeing my Calibre library get bigger and carrying my Kobo around, but there's something satisfying about seeing my bookmark make steady progress through a physical book (slowly; I'm a slow reader).

Digital, no contest.

I'm an old guy and I've been buying and reading books for most of my life. I own thousands of them, filling up shelves and stacked on tables and cluttering everything, and that's even with the bulk of them in boxes in my garage. I love them and I love being surrounded by them, but they're a chore and a burden.

And I have a collection of almost as many ebooks, all in a few GB on a tablet.

So ebooks win on space and convenience.

As far as the actual process of reading goes, they're pretty close to the same, but ebooks have a bit of an edge. I have no issues with a screen, so words on a screen or words on paper are pretty much the same. Physical pages though are bound along one edge and flexible and generally at least subtly curved, while a screen is perfectly flat and evenly lit. Also, on a physical page, I'm stuck with whatever typeface is there, while with an ebook, I can scale it to whatever I want or even change the font or colors or whatever. so ebooks win there too.

And while I'm reading an ebook, I can search the text for any term or character name or phrase, so I can refresh myself on things or find a particular passage or whatever without laboriously thumbing through the pages, and I can switch over to a browser anytime to get background for anything or just look up a word.

And when I finish or drop an ebook, I can just tap the back arrow to go to my shelf, or switch over to an app or browser and go online, and find another one.

So... yeah. I really don't think there's one single thing that physical books do better than ebooks, other than serving as decoration - filling space on shelves.

Digital. I love physical books, but I never read them. Digital is so much easier for me to actually sit down and read, and I love building up my library.

This is the same for me. I love the tactile feeling of books, I love the smell, the weight, the aesthetic and the idea.

They take up so much space though and that can make them a hassle to access. I also like to read in bed which means I need something that can make it's own light, and I like the versatility digital books have in font size and in the case. Especially as a comic reader where you have weekly and monthly issues or chunky volumes it adds up quickly.

Absolutely! The bed point is a big kicker, I don't want to wake my partner up with a light, or with page turns, or sit in an awkward position. Digital is just easier.

Digital, but specifically on an e-ink device. I can't stand trying to read an ebook on an LCD/LED display

Personally, I prefer physical books, especially if it's a book that I really like. There's just something about physically having the book and knowing that you won't lose access to it unless something happens to the book. That being said most of my reading these days is digital simply due to the fact that I don't have the space for all the books I want. Ebooks are just too convenient when it comes to saving space. Still, if it's a book that I think I am going to keep coming back to then I would probably get a physical copy.

It's much nicer to read from physical ones, but i reality I end up borrowing digital copies or audiobooks. I travel often and real books take space, too much I'm afraid.

Same for me but the reason for audiobooks is that I can still be productive while listening to it, like do chores or exercise, whereas a physical book would be a reading-only activity (I can't exercise and read due to motion sickness).

Definitely prefer a real book, of course a ton of convenience to be gained by the various ebook readers. One thing I'll say I have a very hard preference for though is at least an e-ink screen when reading on a digital device. Spend enough time on backlit screens, way nicer when I can't have a physical book to have e-ink and regular lighting.

Do you prefer digital or physical books?

Digital. I live in 76ft^2^ and can no longer store thousands of physical books like I did in a "sticks and bricks" house. But there are ~13,000 easily stored between the e-ink kindle and waiting in the wings in calibre.

Reading is a big part of my retirement plan.

Oh my god I love this. How did you manage to get down to 76 square feet?

I live in a 250 sf apartment and it’s one of the best decisions I’ve made.

Physical because its better for reading. But limited space at my home mean I am most buying digital nowadays.

Physical. I read a lot and a real book won't run out of battery.

I strongly dislike reading from a tablet but I've been meaning to buy a Kindle for some time. Unfortunately they are still ridiculously high priced in my country, so I haven't bit the bullet yet.

I've heard a lot of other users recommend Kobo ereaders, haven't used it myself but you might want to check that out.

I almost always start digital, either ebook or audiobook then buy a physical copy later if I liked it. It's just a lot less friction for starting something new, no needing to go out of my way to a library/bookstore or wait for something to be delivered. Sometimes I'll just take a gamble on something physical if I'm looking for a new travel book or I'm killing time in a library/bookstore though.

I've really wanted to like digital but it just feels lacking to me. I buy pretty much exclusively used and love buying the oldest print of a book I'm looking for. The feel and smell of the paper, the difference in typeface, line spacing and page size between books, the artwork, all the things are important to me I guess. Bonus points if someone left notes or highlighter marks or old library stamps. It's more than just words to read for me.

Plus I like seeing them on the shelf, like little badges of accomplishment for making it through the book, or encouragement to read it if I haven't already.

My brother is similar but he does use an ereader for 90% of books these days. Now his book collecting hobby and the allure of a printed copy are restricted to his favourite or important books, 5 years ago he'd buy 100 books a year for £3 each, nowadays he'll buy 3 or 4 books a year for £50 each and his satisfaction for good quality old or important copies of books goes through the roof.

It's possible to have your cake and eat it too is what I guess I'm saying.

I used to be always for physical books. Then in 2018 I ran out of space in my bookcase and shifted to reading on my phone. Now I am so used to it I can't read physical books anymore... especially since a lot of books I read sometimes are doorstoppers and my phone is definitely smaller and lighter than any physical book I may read.

I prefer to own the physical, and make a DRM-free digital copy for myself. Best of both worlds: I own a physical copy they cannot revoke and that I can transcode again if needed, and I can carry a digital copy that I can watch anywhere on my own terms.

Do you digitize it yourself? That seems like a lot of work, even using ocr. And then making it pretty with formatting and all the stuff to make a good epub.

For books, not really yeah.. I'll find a DRM-free copy elsewhere.

Not for every kind of book, I'd say but digital... 8.5 times out of 10. E-ink screens are amazing and just as good as paper, but having your books also available on your phone, and thus always in your pocket, is transformative. So, digital on a platform that syncs between devices.

Now that I have a Kindle, digital all the way. It's so nice to just throw that tiny thing in a bag and read somewhere, and if you finish your book there are a bunch more on your device. I like that the Kindles allow you to email ebooks to your address to be downloaded so you're not locked into the Amazon store.

Digital, nearest bookstore that sells legitimate copy is around 200 km from my hometown.

I prefer digital books. Not only can I have an entire library in my hands the books are also cheaper making them easier to buy.

Pretty sure this is asking about entertainment literature like novels. I have no real opinion, as I very rarely read those.

Now, technical books like school textbooks and reference texts, physical. Absolutely no contest. I loathe clunkily scrolling around on two separate axes to negotiate pages where the content is nonlinear, broken up by interspersed photos, figures, and tables.

If it’s just text (paperback novels), digital. If it has some illustrations, or is a comic or an art book, physical. Same for technical books with diagrams: physical. I don’t have an iPad or a large ebook to appreciate graphic content in the same way as in a physical book. I have no problems reading novels off my phone, on the other hand.

Physical. Support your local library!

Support your planet, package handlers, and delivery man by going digital. I worked for a shipping company couple years back to pay for school and let me tell you, I would literally load up a half truck with 50 pound boxes of books. Now imagine the carbon footprint of that, not just the amount of trees that had to be cut down, but the emissions from the manufacturing of the paper, ink, glue that goes into the book. Then imagine the carbon emissions from the planes, semis, and delivery trucks that go into delivering that book to a bookstore or library or your home.

Libraries are funded from local and municipal taxes so you renting a book from them is not support, and honestly they do offer digital rentals of ebooks so please stop murdering the planet with your physical books. mmkay

Data centres and “the cloud” are not great for the environment either. DRM forcing people to have their files constantly deleted and redownloaded makes it even worse.

Also, “support” doesn’t have to mean a direct financial transaction. Libraries operate a bit differently from a McDonalds. Even just going in and sitting in a library reading a book without ever taking it out can help to support your local public library.

You understand that the carbon footprint of a 20 mb book on your computer or the cloud is miniscule compared to physical book productions though, some data centers are actually carbon neutral too.

Perhaps. Or perhaps what uses more over a lifetime is an ebook that is bounced around from device to device which all turn to toxic e-waste after a few years, constantly communicating with always-on servers for account data and DRM authentication hosted in a data centre based in a region powered by fossil fuels. All while a paper book just sits on a shelf causing no further environmental impact - potentially for hundreds of years.

To be fair, nobody’s preference for paper books or ebooks will change the environment in any meaningful way - the problems are much more systemic and require radical action from an unwilling corporate and political elite that has been ignoring the problem for decades.

Physical. You do not really own your digital book and you have to depend on a devise that can break/need charging to read.

Depends on the format, you can absolutely own ebooks.

Yes you kind of "own" your ebook, but.... The company that sold it to you can remove it legally form their listings, taking away your ability to download your book.

That's not what I'm referring to. If you have an epub or similar file, you own it. You can store it, and delete it at your own whim.

Yes, but computers are prone to failure, you are depending on a device to hold all your media. I've had backups and backups of backups, still losing things to failure. My books take up space, but they will be there unless my home burns down.

And if you store it in the cloud, and in thumb drives, they will be there even if your home burns down, and far more of em too.

With a cloud you are depending on someone else to hold your property.

Not necessarily, you can self-host. I also listed it as a backup, for actual storage on thumb drives, SD cards, etc. It's really not difficult, files are far more secure and safe than a physical book, which itself degrades upon use.

You have to pay to self host, you have to pay for cloud storage. I am not going to pay to keep books, I buy books and put them on a shelf. I can pull one off and read it when ever I please, I don't depend on any devices to read them, and I like it that way. This is how I feel.

You're fine to prefer that way, but you're just wrong about files being less secure or somehow less owned than physical copies.

It's possible to remove DRM from books using software like calibre and thats not even getting into how easy it is to pirate due to the small filesize if you ever need to recover a lost book. Then you can back it up and copy onto other storage devices and the cloud which in some ways makes the digital copy more long lasting than a physical book.

You can lose your back up, but you can also lose your book. It doesn't change my feelings on the subject. There are physical copies of books that are hundreds of years old and still readable, I have some from the 50s that are in great condition. Take care of them and they will last.

Digital - easier to carry and to handle while reading. Plus u can read on a phone/laptop in dark environments as well. However for reading on a plane, where I'm sitting in one place, I somehow prefer physical books as they're less painful than looking at a lit up screen for extended periods of time.

Digital for sure. Who has room for physical books? The physical books that I've somehow gathered over the years are the worst items I have in terms of volume (or mass) relative to their utility.

Digital because I can read all of my childhood favorites or new finds on my phone!

Physical. The whole feel of it and for old books the smell. Can't beat it. But I still read most books on my phone or a Kindle.

Physical but I have to use digital. An e-ink reader plus an external hard drive allows me to read entire libraries worth of books anywhere I go. You keep two hard drives with a RAID system and you can store those with almost zero risk of failure barring two mechanical faults occurring at once.

What do I use the most? Ebooks, by far, for all the normal reasons. There's just something nice about physical books though, especially old hardback.

I really don't see the appeal of paperbooks anymore. Ebooks are infintly more practical. Lightweight and easily fillable with endless content. Why would I ever want to lug around a single novel when I can just slide my entire library in my purse?

Physical. I love the smell of paper.

I do occasionally use a Kobo, which is a very convenient little device. However, I prefer a paper book.

I prefered physical books for the texture of the pages and the smell of the paper. And my eyes become quickly tired on a screen.
However, I probably read more on screen, btw text messages, social media and articles... I also read comics : super shorts onse, or webtoon that are beautifully designed for a digital reading experience, unlike many digital novel.

And OP, you forget about audiobooks.

I haven't investigated, but I'd give digital books a shake if I could find a solution that doesn't put control of my library in the hands of Amazon or similar, phone home for analytics, etc. I don't object to the idea in principal. But until I feel safe doing it, I'm still reading physical books.

I haven't used it yet, but I hear Libby with a local library card does well. You're still not owning the books, but they're free

Other commenter have mentioned Kobo readers. And of course you could pirate the epubs.

I'll give it a look. Seems that that's a rakuten product though, which isn't much more comforting...

I prefer real paper books. Unfortunately, they can't be pirated, they cost hundreds of dollars per book, my desk cannot accommodate by binder, computer, and also a textbook. If a textbook is under $60 I'll get it regardless if I can/have the e book, but that's because it's not from a big company and I'm not paying for some CEOs seventh yacht, instead it's supporting the person/people who wrote it.

Digital without a doubt.

  • More convenient to travel with it
  • Awesome how the e-ink looks just like paper and draws little energy
  • Your entire library can take much less space
  • Save the trees
  • If it gets damaged, only your device will be destroyed, but your library (hopefully) remains (if you make backups)
  • Instant access to basically any book (no need to wait for delivery or in-person shopping)

To me, my Kobo was one of the best investments I've ever made. Before buying it, I didn't really read many books

I prefer digital books because of the following points:

  • There is a book price control in Germany, meaning that you can't get new physical books cheaper. This does not apply to digital books.
  • They take less physical space.
  • I can read them everywhere with either my Smartphone that I already have with me at all times or my tablet. I do not have to plan to read a book when I'm on the go.
  • I can quickly search for something in a reference book if I have it in digital form. This is not possible with physical books.

Only downside:

  • I need to have a device when I want to read a digital book. And this needs to be charged. But this is rarely a problem.

Digital most of the time, physical for the special books I like

For reading, digital. I can have access to a functionally unlimited number of books. They also tend to be less expensive. That makes a difference for media like manga where it racks up pretty quickly. And I can make adjustments to the text and lighting that help with readability.

I still like having some books around as decoration. They bring a room together nicely.

For entertainment, eBooks. Makes reading in bed so much more comfortable.

For non fiction, audio books. I listen to that stuff on the road while I am receptive.

For non fiction that I need to reference here and there, paper books.

I prefer either physical or audiobooks. I seem to have a hard time concentrating and reading books digitally.

Physical. My ideal invention would look like a blank book. Pages would feel like paper. Insert a 'disc' and text downloads onto the pages. Now it looks and reads like a physical book. Perfect for camping/travel. After you finish the story, you can change the text to a new novel. Of course, you could have pictures and other illustrations. Probably wouldn't be a giant seller, but I'd want one.

Probably the closest thing that actually exists is an e ink display.

As someone who used to write extensive notes in the margins of books digital notetaking has forever replaced physical books for me.

E-ink all the way

Non fiction: Physical all the way Fiction: Whilst I like physical books I rarely make myself time to read them so I mostly consume them in audiobook format.

I've never really got on well with ebooks, I had a cheap kindle about 8 years ago and I think I maybe read about 3 or 4 books on it - in fact I think it was Hugh Howey's Silo series and nothing else.

Digital for entertaining books, paper for technical stuff. But most of the time can't afford one, so just digital.

I go about 50/50 these days.

Browsing a bookstore will always beat out a website. Favorite books or authors will always get a physical purchase. Used books are cheap and awesome. And sometimes lengthy books are easier for me to get through if they're physical.

But I love the convenience of my Kindle. I have a ton of books and can add to that collection any time I want. I can adjust text size, font, etc. Dictionary lookup. Syncs progress with the phone app so I can literally pick up and read anywhere.

I prefer digital with no drm but if that is not possible I will get a physical book.

I prefer an e-reader and digital books. I pirate them for my kindle.

  • No space and weight so you can take them anywhere
  • Piracy
  • Can download far faster than ordering or going to the bookstore
  • Can find niche or foreign books my local bookstores don't have
  • Built-in dictionary and translation is just moah
  • Adjustable text size or font
  • Easy on the eyes, can read in the dark
  • Can pick up where you left off super easily, no need to worry about bookmarks

I was not an avid reader prior to the Kindle purchase. I used to read comic books almost exclusively haha. Nowadays my reading habits include more book reading as well. The Kindle was honestly one of the best purchases I've ever made.

And they're much easier to hold when I'm reading in bed.

Cons:

My bookshelves are sad.
A lot of books are ill suited to digital.
They can vanish at any time (unless you take the time to unlock and archive them).

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

You can always buy them and make a "backup"

I know traditionally the dream fantasy of book readers has been to own an expansive physical library, with shelf after shelf full of book spines, but I just could never get into it. I'm a data hoarder, not an object hoarder! All my books are digital, mandatory in plaintext DRM-free format, sorted and backed up. I find joy in the knowledge that everything I have ever read is instantly grep'able, ageless, and can fit in my pocket (on a thumbdrive) wherever I go.

I do prefer to read on e-ink as well, because the device is lighter than any book, guaranteed to fit in my pocket, can hold multiple books, and gives me control over font size. The only downside is when the battery gets old it needs more frequent recharging. A paper book will not refuse to work for lack of power!

For the books I love and want to read over and over, physical. For the books I want to read once and maybe reference from time to time, digital all the way. My e-reader makes digital books a breeze to read, and I'm actually at the point where it's 5GB of storage isn't enough for my library.

Digital on the Kindle Paperwhite, but only because it's easier and I don't accumulate a physical book if I buy it (if the library doesn't have it). I like book books but don't like owning many books.

Comics/graphic novels I like on paper. No other format compares.

Can't do audiobooks, I read faster than I talk or listen so the pace bothers me.

I relate to all of this!

I do however mostly read digital books in bed, so it has huge sleep cues for me. Holding the pages open on some thick space opera sci-fi is too tiresome

Convenience is a hell of a drug

I can't read anything longer than 100 or so pages on my phone, I just put it down and never pick back up. I like physical books but I mostly read on e-ink kobo. The last few big doorstop type books were/are on e-ink

Digital! But only in a kindle paperwhite. Or perhaps any other e-ink screen, but not LEDs.

  • I can read lying down on my side without having to roll over or hold the book weird
  • If I drop it in the tub it doesn’t matter
  • I can change the font of whatever I read to OpenDyslexic, which helps me read faster and with far less eye strain
  • I can read in the dark
  • I can highlight portions and take notes without permanently marking up a book
  • I can long-press any word to see its definition. Same for translations of vocab I don’t know when I’m reading in Spanish
  • I can get a new book in seconds
  • I get to finally have an aspect of the third millennium technology that I actually kind of enjoy

Digital works really well for me. My phone can carry an effectively infinite number of books. I can try before I buy with Google Play. I can grab library books with Libby.

For my kids, reading on paper is perfect. Nice big text. They can put their finger on the page. When reading long books, they see their progress as they work their way through.

Absolutely digital.

If it's fanfiction/non-comics, then digital all the way. But if it's comics or manga, then having a physical copy is always super nice.

ebooks. I read better with a back light, I have found, and generally read with light text on a dark background, both of which my tablet makes really easy

For all the logical reasons - space, portability, seachability yada yada - ebooks win all the time.

However, if I am reading in comfort at home and have the option I will still go for a paperback every time. Paperback, mind. Not a hardback, which have never appealed to me.

Reading Ebooks is like watching a movie on a (crappy) smartphone. It’s just not as enjoyable for me.

As a shortsighted person - reading with an ebook reader in bed after removing glasses is significantly easier than reading an actual book.