Imagine being the person being told: yeah, so we only hired you to challenge beauty standards. Not because you're the best at what you do, oh no no, but because you're ugly af
If you pay me her salary, you can motivate it however you want.
It looks like this picture was taken the moment they told her
Except she's absolutely gorgeous herself, as was made clear when they removed the prosthetics. None of the claim makes any sense đ
You could tell she was beautiful even with the prosthetics.
True
I would eat a trail of **** to get to her ***** to **** the **** out of her.
To be fair, she's definitely a breakout star of the show. I believe that before Witcher she had mostly worked in theatre, and even then was new to the industry.
I don't buy it, she was amazing in season one. Season two it's hard to tell because they apparently forgot everything about her characters wants, needs, and motivations.
I'm now at a point that I can't watch American media at all because everyone just looks the fuckin same.
Generic actress no.495 with horrifyingly white teeth Vs generic actor no.5638 with horrifyingly white teeth
What's is this with the teeth? Are they all wearing fake teeth? Don't tell me everyone has such a great mouth hygiene and dental care with sugar in everything you eat in US?
Serious answer? Yes. They often have either bleached teeth, which eventually destroys them so then they need veneers (fake front) and after that they get dentures.
What.
JustâŚwhat.
Where are you getting this information? Youâre talking about the US, where we have excellent healthcare for people who can afford it, and those people can fuckin afford it.
Being rich does not make people smart.
âŚokay? What does that have to do with anything? Are you okay?
They spend a lot of money on the appearance of their teeth, instead of spending it on the health of their teeth. Seemed pretty obvious to me.
that's a pretty ironic comment lol
Americans have really white teeth compared to the rest of the world, especially in hollywood
A fact many Americans are trying to kill because "fluoride in the water is bad"
Imagine thinking that
where we have excellent healthcare for people who can afford it
Is something to be proud of.
Christ on a bike
I don't think that was being stated as a point of pride. It's just the shitty state of things here.
Sorry, but he is obviously proud of that. Look at his response https://lemm.ee/comment/12363119. He is clearly so much smarter than the rest of us, so he doesn't realize the dumb shit he is saying hahahaha.
Are you ok
Is the most condescending, cunty, redditesque remark of the last year
No, you were very much misreading the comment. They just threw a crazy factoid out there. And then followed with a non sequitur about ârich =/= smart.â And why would my confusion mean I love privatized medicine?
I mean, youâre not wrong about me being smarter than the rest of you. Iâm just choosing to ignore the part where itâs only in my head. Because Iâm so much smarter. (jk)
I love how people like you sometimes stumble into weird truths hahaha. Like yeah, the stupid medical system you guys have in the US sucks even for people with money (luckily I'm from a latin american country that's not yet a pro/anti US dictatorship, but soon ...). Like it's that ridiculous, even people with money in the US end up fucking themselves medically, that's the freedom you get from that stupid healthcare system hahahaha. And people like you have stockholm syndrom.
Sadly this is infecting my country too, famous and rich people now have pennywise white teeth lol. For now I don't feel too bad for them, fuck these pricks wasting money in this shit while people go hungry here. But I do feel a bit sad for them.
If I ever get dummy rich Iâm gonna get veneers, but Iâm gonna have em just do the cheaper solid titanium ones for my entire mouth. Look like a fucken halloween monster so people wonât take me seriously if I ever get delirious enough to veer into politics or something else rich people shouldnât do.
Hahahahahaha, nice one. But I suspect people will actually trust you more with your titanium teeth lol.
I donât know what you think my beliefs about the healthcare system are. But Iâm pretty damn sure theyâre not what youâre assuming.
Because of our vampiric, fucked up greedy system of healthcare, it attracts pretty amazing doctors because they make insane money. Private money is good for the people who tend to control it. Itâs just horrific for those of us without money. So the rich tend to get insanely good healthcare in the US.
I'm sorry if you meant something else dude. But read your comment and your reply and see what you actually said dude. You sound like you are saying that rich people are so smart and well protected from their bad decision by your healthcare system, so they are not whitening their teeth? Hell, even if you were right about this you don't provide any evidence or arguments for anything you said, you were just rude and condescending to everyone.
Again, I'm sorry if you meant something else. But people missinterpreting here is on you man.
Dude. I reread it dude. It does not read that way. Others have even said thatâs not what I said. It could be misconstrued that way, but thatâs exactly what it is. A misconstruction.
Youâre just having a hard time because thereâs nuance. I was expressing something that doesnât scream that I hate the way things work, but that what the person was saying seemed outlandish. This being the internet, itâs hard when things arenât âI believe Xâ and âwell, I hate X, Iâm a Yâer!â There is a range of conversation from disagreement on the subject to disagreement on the discussion to literally so much nuance in between. You just think because I said something that someone could say in a screed about supporting the system.
The gross inequity of for-profit healthcare means there is a ton of money to be made. Logically, that attracts high quality doctorsâfor those that can afford it. It shouldnât be that way. But it is.
Just because you read the word âqualityâ in association with the US healthcare system doesnât mean I support it. Recognizing trends and truths about things that may be construed as a positive for issues you donât agree with does not mean you support the idea. Ignoring those truths just because they donât jibe with you worldview is beyond ignorant.
Creating an unequal system that means access is limited to those with insane amounts of money will lead to higher amounts of money for people taking it from the rich people. Acknowledging that should be a pretty basic truth. But this is the time of internet two-sidesism, where people routinely ignore and deny basic realities because it doesnât help their argument is fucking dumb. But thatâs the temperature of the water weâre swimming in. So it struck you as strange that I wouldnât do mental gymnastics to ignore a fact thatâs gross, even if it could be construed as a positive for people who support it.
Look man. This comment is actually very different to your initial comment, and honestly it sounds very reasonable to me.
But can you explain to me what you were trying to say in the original comment please? Again, to me it reads like you are saying "rich and famous people are not whitening their teeths in the USA" which is factually incorrect. And to top it off, it looks like you are saying "it's impossible for rich people to get bad healthcare in the US because they have money", which is non sense as shown by this example of teeth whitening. And the more I read this comment, plus your very rude response ("are you okay?" Seriously dude, that's no way to have a conversation even if you were right), the more it looks like this is what you are saying. And that's what I was answering to.
I'm not saying, and I never said, that you think the healthcare system in the US is good. But the more I re read your comments, the less I understand what you were trying to say if it's not what I "quoted" above.
Itâs not though. All I said is that people with tons of money can get the best care in the worldâavailable in the US. Thatâs not a condemnation of socialized medicine, thatâs not an endorsement of privatized medicine. Thatâs me saying exactly what Iâm saying in this comment in another way. These people can afford the best. Because theyâre rich as fuck.
Subtext: BEING RICH SHOULD NOT BE A HURDLE TO GOOD HEALTHCARE.
Theyâre in LA. A place that attracts plastic surgeons, orthodontists, dentists, any doctor that deals in appearance. Because they make insane money with their celebrity clientele.
So many Hollywood actors are nepo babies. They have cosmetic doctors that can do anything and everything at the right cost. I donât have the data, but Iâd be willing to bet itâs a majority of them that come from famous Hollywood parents. They are in Hollywood because they were born into it. They grew up with Hollywood level beautification health care. That includes teeth.
Unfortunately it's true. It's pretty well known in beauty/aesthetic procedure spaces, which many celebrities inhabit. It's why so many have samey looking teeth, it's wild.
Veneers are very popular nowadays amongst the rich and those that wish to appear rich
Not all actors grew up rich? Some of them fucked around with drugs pretty hard when they were younger too.
That is becoming less and less the case. Nepotism is insane in Hollywood.
There's still the occasional person "off the street" but the large percentage of them are someone famous's cousin, nephew, sister, etc...
its not completely wrong. getting cosmetic veneers is a pretty common practice in hollywood. they don't cause your teeth to decay or whatever, but lots of celebs have them.
Donât forget the wholesale smoking since theyâre teenagers.
Itâs even sadder when you have an actor(ess) that is beautiful in their own way and then gets surgery or something else to conform to the way everyone else looks.
Erin Moriarty pictures just make me fucking sad.
She was literally the first person I thought of when reading this as well.
I looked up a recent interview for The Boys season 4 and I have no idea what y'all are talking about. At most, she changed the type of makeup she regularly does and lost weight/aged out of her baby face. Your face can change a lot, especially in your 20s. I'm also not sure what wasn't conventionally about her at any point.
Thinking she's had surgery when she hasn't is more toxic for beauty standards than if she did have work done. Lip fillers, natural changes, and makeup aren't some work of the devil. There are people who do actually have problems, but not everyone does.
She hasnât owned up to it but very much did not deny.
Edit: for the record I had no idea there was a whole thing around her a Megan Kelly. Canât agree with all the hate.
That said, Iâm replying to a comment about people having surgery/other medical procedures/drastic makeup etc that causes great changes and she was the first one that popped into my head. She hasnât denied the surgery. Just said Kelly was spreading false news. But in all her statements she has never denied the surgery from my understanding.
I also donât agree that itâs âfucking sadâ as commenter above me states. She can do whatever she wants itâs her body. Having surgery or not doesnât matter at all. I still hold that she looks drastically different from 5 years ago regardless of the reason.
She does. She definitely goes for a different look now.
She didn't age out her baby face. That was the surgery.
I looked again, and it's even more clear to me that those changes are fat distribution and makeup related. She's always had a narrow nose, her jawline hasn't changed, her brow line, her chin, none of the things that plastic surgery typically alters have been noticeably tweaked! What is different is her makeup, particularly the way she contours her cheeks. She didn't do it in the past because her cheeks were more plump. Her makeup now tries to be more mature, creating contrast where it didn't before.
Dysphoria and learning to analyze bone structure vs fat vs makeup changes has made me pay more attention to these things. Even if she has done work, it isn't drastic and wouldn't be related to what makes her look so different. Faces change and can be changed without surgery. This is like some conspiracy theory body double or transvestiogation shit. Goofy af.
Case is point: the actress that was playing Starlight in "The boys"
Usually I don't notice but it was pretty jarring in Book of Boba Fett. The guy was all dusty living in a desert and then he smiles and his teeth are blindingly white. I was like.. Damn Disney you can't afford the makeup department to dirty those up a bit?
I had the same problem with the 2018 tomb raider. Lara Crofts dad spends years surviving in a cave on an island and has perfect fucking teeth.
That's one way to cut down on processed sugar.
Might not be any bacteria that cause tooth decay.
You prefer the yellow teeth snaggletooth actresses?
yellow = anything less white than #FFFFFF ? god damn
You mean the realistic teeth actresses?
You bet your ass.
I am American and I am not offended by this. I'm not even sure I disagree
Challenge beauty standards of a character that was supposed to be unrealistically beautiful.
Was she? I could swear in the books she was described as not conventionally beautiful
You're right. They just made her drop dead stunning in the games, so that's how the bulk of the fandom envisions her
If you ask me, Anya Chalotra is even MORE beautiful than the game version of Yennefer lol
Way to challenge beauty standards! đ
I'm pretty sure the whole thing is that witches in the witcher universe can shape their faces however they want so they all choose to be super pretty? Am I misremembering or did yennefer make herself "not conventionally beautiful" on purpose?
You're completely correct.
âUnlike priestesses and druidesses, who only unwillingly took ugly or crippled girls, sorcerers took anyone who showed evidence of a predisposition. If the child passes the first years of training, magic entered into the equation â straightening and evening out legs, repairing bones which had badly knitted, patching harelips, removing scars, birthmarks and pox scars. The young sorceress would become attractive because the prestige of her profession demanded it.â
This is just another way in which the TV show butchered the original, although it is far below the ladder in comparison with the fact that they turned the endless interesting philosophical debates into dull, uninteresting conversations.
She was ugly before she became a sorceress, if I remember correctly.
They just mean not white
Oh. I thought she was the Hollywood version of âuglyâ
Exactly
Casting director? Yeah. I'm pretty sure that's it. If you ever read casting calls they are weirdly racist from every angle
It could also really mean "Non-white for racist audiences"
Iâve still never met a man who actually wonât recognize that a hot woman from another race isnât hot. They can be insanely racist and still call a hot black woman hot. This casting director is a moron.
Also, "not blonde" considering the typical Hollywood stereotypes.
It exactly means that.
The likely explanation is that the publication intentionally misrepresented what the casting director said. They were probably talking about how what they DID with her in the first season challenged beauty standards. They intentionally made her "ugly" for the story. The casting director might not have meant they hired her because she wasn't conventionally attractive, but the publication knew they could get more clicks by quoting her out of context.
Also, this thread has been kind of toxic about beauty stuff which makes me sad :(
I donât understand how making her ugly, having every character call her ugly, and then making her hot and having every character recognize sheâs hot challenges beauty standards.
In the books there is very little mention of her being a hunchback. They didn't need to spend so much time it
The witcher approached, watchful and silent. He saw her left shoulder, slightly higher than her right.
He continued watching. She had the figure of a twenty-year-old although he preferred not to guess her real age. She moved with a natural, unaffected grace. No, there was no way of guessing what she'd been like before, what had been improved. He stopped thinking about it; there wasn't any sense.
But he suddenly knew the truth. He knew it. He knew what she used to be.
Thatâs interesting and all, but I donât see how that helps their case that this challenged beauty standards. If anything, it reinforces beauty standards because she hated being ugly and was very happy to be made beautiful, and just about every person around her reinforced that.
Casting a beautiful actress and making her ugly never challenges beauty standards. The claim is bullshit.
However, focusing on her ugly beginning provides more weight to why she paid the price of sterility for beauty, and why she's so desperate to adopt ciri.
She was actually made up to be pretty ugly for most of the first season, but they hotted her up at the end as the result of some magic shit.
I watched it once four years ago, so donât remember the details.
Most sorceresses in that universe enhance their beauty/youthfulness with magic. Most sorcerers do not because they're taken more seriously as they age. It's essentially a commentary on what each gender derives power from. Yennefer is like 80 years old by the time the main story begins.
It's far more simple than that. The students are predominantly nobles, and they pretty much completely cut all ties to their previous lives.
So why would you send a hot daughter to become a witch when you can marry her and make political gains? You send the disfigured one so you don't have to waste any more money on her.
The 5th son doesn't need to be disfigured to be essentially useless in the political world.
that would be a decent assumption to jump to if you didn't know the real answer i guess...
sorceresses in the Witcher were largely discarded children that were sick or disfigured. they eventually use magic to "fix" their bodies. many of them are obsessive about thiz and use magic to be the most beautiful person in the room because of their disfigured past.
there is very little connection between high birth and being a sorceress in the Witcher. all of the specific examples we hear are of farm peasents being scooped up just to take the burden off their parent's hands.
this is a bleak story, many of the sorcerers and sorceresses in it are at Best morally grey. it is not beyond most of them to take that child and experiment on them if they don't have the aptitude for magic. they are also sterile. much like witchers, they must take in outsiders to propagate.
unless the show has its own lore or something. IDK i stopped watching after season 2 was completely its own story, unrelated to the books at all.
Tell me you that you haven't read the books without saying " I haven't read the books".
Honestly trying to figure out if they're an LLM or not
They are not. They just aren't in traditional pacing.
Not sure where you're getting that from. As far as I know none of the sorceresses' familial backgrounds are explored aside from Yennefer's. Either in the Netflix show, the books, or the games. Additionally, magical ability is exceedingly rare and not confined to the nobility. The chances of the majority of the sorceresses being from noble families is extremely low.
Even when she was made up to be ugly they couldn't bring themselves to mess with her perfect tits though. They didn't commit that much.
In the books yen uses magic to hide her hunchback and ugliness. Geralt being a Witcher and therefore trained/experienced to analyse magic in front of him quickly sees through the illusion. If the show had the character look uglier to begin with then that's probably a result of adapting the books. I haven't watched the show as I don't really like adaptations. Btw it's not just Yen that uses magic to hide ugliness either, almost all other sorceresses do as well in the books including Triss.
Interesting, in the show it isn't really an illusion, they physically change her.
It's also like that in the books. In the book Geralt can somehow see it in her eyes. He says they're the eyes of a hunchback or something along those lines.
Maybe he's not sure and it's just a hunch.
Lmao wtf does that even mean. Imagine someone telling you that
Geralt read some meninim playbook and tried to neg the fuck out of her.
"You are beautiful but I see hunchback in your eyes."
He said it in his head hahaha not in to her
Dude, you totally have club foot eyes!
Youâre a knockout but you have the eyes of someone who grew up poor and fat so I know you have a great personality
She is very strong character in the books. He means despite the front he still sees the pain of rejection inher eyes.
Redpill negging wtf Geralt
Me, being simple minded, assumed it was two different actors for hunchback-Yen and smokeshow-Yen.
I kinda get what they mean. Itâs not that sheâs ugly, itâs that sheâs hot as fuck but doesnât look like a generic âhot actressâ
I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I don't think she's that hot.
Your eyes broken bro
Either that or their beholder is broken.
a beholder is just a really big eye. The more you know.
Oh, so only the big eye gets any positive attention now!
What about all the eye stalks doing all the important work while that giant ball hog in the middle steals all of the credit?!?!
she's a smoke show, dude
shes half indian, so I understand the director
You want to challenge beauty standards? Cast Steve Buscemi as Geralt and Lizzo as Yennifer.
Wtf Steve Buscemi is hot af
There's a meme comparing him to Angelina Jolie and while I personally don't think she's hot, a vast majority of people do, ergo Steve is objectively and undeniably the most attractive man on earth.
Is this the women from Mr Robot or do I suck at faces?
Now, this is not Holland saying that Chalotra is ugly, or that they cast someone ugly to play the role of the most beautiful woman in the world. ... Rather, Holland is saying that she is challenging the âstandard of beautyâ by casting a woman with slightly darker skin.
I do understand that traditional Western fantasy is predominantly white, but I disagree fundamentally with the notion that the âstandard of beautyâ for most people is being white. I donât think anyone in the entire world outside of a tiny, tiny sliver of absolute racist scumbags would look at Anya Chalotra and think anything other than âThis woman is jaw-droppingly gorgeous.â Casting Chalotra may challenge our perceptions of fantasy as white (a complicated discussion on its own) but it does nothing to challenge any standard of beauty.
Imagine being the person being told: yeah, so we only hired you to challenge beauty standards. Not because you're the best at what you do, oh no no, but because you're ugly af
If you pay me her salary, you can motivate it however you want.
It looks like this picture was taken the moment they told her
Except she's absolutely gorgeous herself, as was made clear when they removed the prosthetics. None of the claim makes any sense đ
You could tell she was beautiful even with the prosthetics.
True
I would eat a trail of **** to get to her ***** to **** the **** out of her.
To be fair, she's definitely a breakout star of the show. I believe that before Witcher she had mostly worked in theatre, and even then was new to the industry.
I don't buy it, she was amazing in season one. Season two it's hard to tell because they apparently forgot everything about her characters wants, needs, and motivations.
I'm now at a point that I can't watch American media at all because everyone just looks the fuckin same.
Generic actress no.495 with horrifyingly white teeth Vs generic actor no.5638 with horrifyingly white teeth
What's is this with the teeth? Are they all wearing fake teeth? Don't tell me everyone has such a great mouth hygiene and dental care with sugar in everything you eat in US?
Serious answer? Yes. They often have either bleached teeth, which eventually destroys them so then they need veneers (fake front) and after that they get dentures.
What.
JustâŚwhat.
Where are you getting this information? Youâre talking about the US, where we have excellent healthcare for people who can afford it, and those people can fuckin afford it.
Being rich does not make people smart.
âŚokay? What does that have to do with anything? Are you okay?
They spend a lot of money on the appearance of their teeth, instead of spending it on the health of their teeth. Seemed pretty obvious to me.
that's a pretty ironic comment lol
Americans have really white teeth compared to the rest of the world, especially in hollywood
A fact many Americans are trying to kill because "fluoride in the water is bad"
Imagine thinking that
Is something to be proud of.
Christ on a bike
I don't think that was being stated as a point of pride. It's just the shitty state of things here.
Sorry, but he is obviously proud of that. Look at his response https://lemm.ee/comment/12363119. He is clearly so much smarter than the rest of us, so he doesn't realize the dumb shit he is saying hahahaha.
Is the most condescending, cunty, redditesque remark of the last year
No, you were very much misreading the comment. They just threw a crazy factoid out there. And then followed with a non sequitur about ârich =/= smart.â And why would my confusion mean I love privatized medicine?
I mean, youâre not wrong about me being smarter than the rest of you. Iâm just choosing to ignore the part where itâs only in my head. Because Iâm so much smarter. (jk)
I love how people like you sometimes stumble into weird truths hahaha. Like yeah, the stupid medical system you guys have in the US sucks even for people with money (luckily I'm from a latin american country that's not yet a pro/anti US dictatorship, but soon ...). Like it's that ridiculous, even people with money in the US end up fucking themselves medically, that's the freedom you get from that stupid healthcare system hahahaha. And people like you have stockholm syndrom.
Sadly this is infecting my country too, famous and rich people now have pennywise white teeth lol. For now I don't feel too bad for them, fuck these pricks wasting money in this shit while people go hungry here. But I do feel a bit sad for them.
If I ever get dummy rich Iâm gonna get veneers, but Iâm gonna have em just do the cheaper solid titanium ones for my entire mouth. Look like a fucken halloween monster so people wonât take me seriously if I ever get delirious enough to veer into politics or something else rich people shouldnât do.
Hahahahahaha, nice one. But I suspect people will actually trust you more with your titanium teeth lol.
I donât know what you think my beliefs about the healthcare system are. But Iâm pretty damn sure theyâre not what youâre assuming.
Because of our vampiric, fucked up greedy system of healthcare, it attracts pretty amazing doctors because they make insane money. Private money is good for the people who tend to control it. Itâs just horrific for those of us without money. So the rich tend to get insanely good healthcare in the US.
I'm sorry if you meant something else dude. But read your comment and your reply and see what you actually said dude. You sound like you are saying that rich people are so smart and well protected from their bad decision by your healthcare system, so they are not whitening their teeth? Hell, even if you were right about this you don't provide any evidence or arguments for anything you said, you were just rude and condescending to everyone.
Again, I'm sorry if you meant something else. But people missinterpreting here is on you man.
Dude. I reread it dude. It does not read that way. Others have even said thatâs not what I said. It could be misconstrued that way, but thatâs exactly what it is. A misconstruction.
Youâre just having a hard time because thereâs nuance. I was expressing something that doesnât scream that I hate the way things work, but that what the person was saying seemed outlandish. This being the internet, itâs hard when things arenât âI believe Xâ and âwell, I hate X, Iâm a Yâer!â There is a range of conversation from disagreement on the subject to disagreement on the discussion to literally so much nuance in between. You just think because I said something that someone could say in a screed about supporting the system.
The gross inequity of for-profit healthcare means there is a ton of money to be made. Logically, that attracts high quality doctorsâfor those that can afford it. It shouldnât be that way. But it is.
https://www.physiciansweekly.com/how-do-us-physician-salaries-compare-with-those-abroad/
Look at the difference there.
Just because you read the word âqualityâ in association with the US healthcare system doesnât mean I support it. Recognizing trends and truths about things that may be construed as a positive for issues you donât agree with does not mean you support the idea. Ignoring those truths just because they donât jibe with you worldview is beyond ignorant.
Creating an unequal system that means access is limited to those with insane amounts of money will lead to higher amounts of money for people taking it from the rich people. Acknowledging that should be a pretty basic truth. But this is the time of internet two-sidesism, where people routinely ignore and deny basic realities because it doesnât help their argument is fucking dumb. But thatâs the temperature of the water weâre swimming in. So it struck you as strange that I wouldnât do mental gymnastics to ignore a fact thatâs gross, even if it could be construed as a positive for people who support it.
Look man. This comment is actually very different to your initial comment, and honestly it sounds very reasonable to me.
But can you explain to me what you were trying to say in the original comment please? Again, to me it reads like you are saying "rich and famous people are not whitening their teeths in the USA" which is factually incorrect. And to top it off, it looks like you are saying "it's impossible for rich people to get bad healthcare in the US because they have money", which is non sense as shown by this example of teeth whitening. And the more I read this comment, plus your very rude response ("are you okay?" Seriously dude, that's no way to have a conversation even if you were right), the more it looks like this is what you are saying. And that's what I was answering to.
I'm not saying, and I never said, that you think the healthcare system in the US is good. But the more I re read your comments, the less I understand what you were trying to say if it's not what I "quoted" above.
Itâs not though. All I said is that people with tons of money can get the best care in the worldâavailable in the US. Thatâs not a condemnation of socialized medicine, thatâs not an endorsement of privatized medicine. Thatâs me saying exactly what Iâm saying in this comment in another way. These people can afford the best. Because theyâre rich as fuck.
Subtext: BEING RICH SHOULD NOT BE A HURDLE TO GOOD HEALTHCARE.
Theyâre in LA. A place that attracts plastic surgeons, orthodontists, dentists, any doctor that deals in appearance. Because they make insane money with their celebrity clientele.
So many Hollywood actors are nepo babies. They have cosmetic doctors that can do anything and everything at the right cost. I donât have the data, but Iâd be willing to bet itâs a majority of them that come from famous Hollywood parents. They are in Hollywood because they were born into it. They grew up with Hollywood level beautification health care. That includes teeth.
Unfortunately it's true. It's pretty well known in beauty/aesthetic procedure spaces, which many celebrities inhabit. It's why so many have samey looking teeth, it's wild.
Veneers are very popular nowadays amongst the rich and those that wish to appear rich
Not all actors grew up rich? Some of them fucked around with drugs pretty hard when they were younger too.
That is becoming less and less the case. Nepotism is insane in Hollywood.
There's still the occasional person "off the street" but the large percentage of them are someone famous's cousin, nephew, sister, etc...
its not completely wrong. getting cosmetic veneers is a pretty common practice in hollywood. they don't cause your teeth to decay or whatever, but lots of celebs have them.
Donât forget the wholesale smoking since theyâre teenagers.
Itâs even sadder when you have an actor(ess) that is beautiful in their own way and then gets surgery or something else to conform to the way everyone else looks.
Erin Moriarty pictures just make me fucking sad.
She was literally the first person I thought of when reading this as well.
I looked up a recent interview for The Boys season 4 and I have no idea what y'all are talking about. At most, she changed the type of makeup she regularly does and lost weight/aged out of her baby face. Your face can change a lot, especially in your 20s. I'm also not sure what wasn't conventionally about her at any point.
Thinking she's had surgery when she hasn't is more toxic for beauty standards than if she did have work done. Lip fillers, natural changes, and makeup aren't some work of the devil. There are people who do actually have problems, but not everyone does.
Except she has had surgery?
https://wegotthiscovered.com/celebrities/what-happened-to-erin-moriarty-erin-moriartys-plastic-surgery-explained/
https://www.screengeek.net/2024/02/02/erin-moriarty-plastic-surgery-accusations-response/
She hasnât owned up to it but very much did not deny.
Edit: for the record I had no idea there was a whole thing around her a Megan Kelly. Canât agree with all the hate.
That said, Iâm replying to a comment about people having surgery/other medical procedures/drastic makeup etc that causes great changes and she was the first one that popped into my head. She hasnât denied the surgery. Just said Kelly was spreading false news. But in all her statements she has never denied the surgery from my understanding.
I also donât agree that itâs âfucking sadâ as commenter above me states. She can do whatever she wants itâs her body. Having surgery or not doesnât matter at all. I still hold that she looks drastically different from 5 years ago regardless of the reason.
She does. She definitely goes for a different look now.
She didn't age out her baby face. That was the surgery.
I looked again, and it's even more clear to me that those changes are fat distribution and makeup related. She's always had a narrow nose, her jawline hasn't changed, her brow line, her chin, none of the things that plastic surgery typically alters have been noticeably tweaked! What is different is her makeup, particularly the way she contours her cheeks. She didn't do it in the past because her cheeks were more plump. Her makeup now tries to be more mature, creating contrast where it didn't before.
Dysphoria and learning to analyze bone structure vs fat vs makeup changes has made me pay more attention to these things. Even if she has done work, it isn't drastic and wouldn't be related to what makes her look so different. Faces change and can be changed without surgery. This is like some conspiracy theory body double or transvestiogation shit. Goofy af.
Case is point: the actress that was playing Starlight in "The boys"
Usually I don't notice but it was pretty jarring in Book of Boba Fett. The guy was all dusty living in a desert and then he smiles and his teeth are blindingly white. I was like.. Damn Disney you can't afford the makeup department to dirty those up a bit?
I had the same problem with the 2018 tomb raider. Lara Crofts dad spends years surviving in a cave on an island and has perfect fucking teeth.
That's one way to cut down on processed sugar.
Might not be any bacteria that cause tooth decay.
You prefer the yellow teeth snaggletooth actresses?
yellow = anything less white than #FFFFFF ? god damn
You mean the realistic teeth actresses?
You bet your ass.
I am American and I am not offended by this. I'm not even sure I disagree
Challenge beauty standards of a character that was supposed to be unrealistically beautiful.
Was she? I could swear in the books she was described as not conventionally beautiful
You're right. They just made her drop dead stunning in the games, so that's how the bulk of the fandom envisions her
If you ask me, Anya Chalotra is even MORE beautiful than the game version of Yennefer lol
Way to challenge beauty standards! đ
I'm pretty sure the whole thing is that witches in the witcher universe can shape their faces however they want so they all choose to be super pretty? Am I misremembering or did yennefer make herself "not conventionally beautiful" on purpose?
You're completely correct.
This is just another way in which the TV show butchered the original, although it is far below the ladder in comparison with the fact that they turned the endless interesting philosophical debates into dull, uninteresting conversations.
She was ugly before she became a sorceress, if I remember correctly.
They just mean not white
Oh. I thought she was the Hollywood version of âuglyâ
Exactly
Casting director? Yeah. I'm pretty sure that's it. If you ever read casting calls they are weirdly racist from every angle
It could also really mean "Non-white for racist audiences"
Iâve still never met a man who actually wonât recognize that a hot woman from another race isnât hot. They can be insanely racist and still call a hot black woman hot. This casting director is a moron.
Also, "not blonde" considering the typical Hollywood stereotypes.
It exactly means that.
The likely explanation is that the publication intentionally misrepresented what the casting director said. They were probably talking about how what they DID with her in the first season challenged beauty standards. They intentionally made her "ugly" for the story. The casting director might not have meant they hired her because she wasn't conventionally attractive, but the publication knew they could get more clicks by quoting her out of context.
Also, this thread has been kind of toxic about beauty stuff which makes me sad :(
I donât understand how making her ugly, having every character call her ugly, and then making her hot and having every character recognize sheâs hot challenges beauty standards.
In the books there is very little mention of her being a hunchback. They didn't need to spend so much time it
Thatâs interesting and all, but I donât see how that helps their case that this challenged beauty standards. If anything, it reinforces beauty standards because she hated being ugly and was very happy to be made beautiful, and just about every person around her reinforced that.
Casting a beautiful actress and making her ugly never challenges beauty standards. The claim is bullshit.
However, focusing on her ugly beginning provides more weight to why she paid the price of sterility for beauty, and why she's so desperate to adopt ciri.
She was actually made up to be pretty ugly for most of the first season, but they hotted her up at the end as the result of some magic shit.
I watched it once four years ago, so donât remember the details.
Most sorceresses in that universe enhance their beauty/youthfulness with magic. Most sorcerers do not because they're taken more seriously as they age. It's essentially a commentary on what each gender derives power from. Yennefer is like 80 years old by the time the main story begins.
It's far more simple than that. The students are predominantly nobles, and they pretty much completely cut all ties to their previous lives.
So why would you send a hot daughter to become a witch when you can marry her and make political gains? You send the disfigured one so you don't have to waste any more money on her.
The 5th son doesn't need to be disfigured to be essentially useless in the political world.
that would be a decent assumption to jump to if you didn't know the real answer i guess...
sorceresses in the Witcher were largely discarded children that were sick or disfigured. they eventually use magic to "fix" their bodies. many of them are obsessive about thiz and use magic to be the most beautiful person in the room because of their disfigured past.
there is very little connection between high birth and being a sorceress in the Witcher. all of the specific examples we hear are of farm peasents being scooped up just to take the burden off their parent's hands.
this is a bleak story, many of the sorcerers and sorceresses in it are at Best morally grey. it is not beyond most of them to take that child and experiment on them if they don't have the aptitude for magic. they are also sterile. much like witchers, they must take in outsiders to propagate.
unless the show has its own lore or something. IDK i stopped watching after season 2 was completely its own story, unrelated to the books at all.
Tell me you that you haven't read the books without saying " I haven't read the books".
Honestly trying to figure out if they're an LLM or not
They are not. They just aren't in traditional pacing.
Not sure where you're getting that from. As far as I know none of the sorceresses' familial backgrounds are explored aside from Yennefer's. Either in the Netflix show, the books, or the games. Additionally, magical ability is exceedingly rare and not confined to the nobility. The chances of the majority of the sorceresses being from noble families is extremely low.
Even when she was made up to be ugly they couldn't bring themselves to mess with her perfect tits though. They didn't commit that much.
In the books yen uses magic to hide her hunchback and ugliness. Geralt being a Witcher and therefore trained/experienced to analyse magic in front of him quickly sees through the illusion. If the show had the character look uglier to begin with then that's probably a result of adapting the books. I haven't watched the show as I don't really like adaptations. Btw it's not just Yen that uses magic to hide ugliness either, almost all other sorceresses do as well in the books including Triss.
Interesting, in the show it isn't really an illusion, they physically change her.
It's also like that in the books. In the book Geralt can somehow see it in her eyes. He says they're the eyes of a hunchback or something along those lines.
Maybe he's not sure and it's just a hunch.
Lmao wtf does that even mean. Imagine someone telling you that
Geralt read some meninim playbook and tried to neg the fuck out of her.
"You are beautiful but I see hunchback in your eyes."
He said it in his head hahaha not in to her
Dude, you totally have club foot eyes!
Youâre a knockout but you have the eyes of someone who grew up poor and fat so I know you have a great personality
She is very strong character in the books. He means despite the front he still sees the pain of rejection inher eyes.
Redpill negging wtf Geralt
Me, being simple minded, assumed it was two different actors for hunchback-Yen and smokeshow-Yen.
I kinda get what they mean. Itâs not that sheâs ugly, itâs that sheâs hot as fuck but doesnât look like a generic âhot actressâ
I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I don't think she's that hot.
Your eyes broken bro
Either that or their beholder is broken.
a beholder is just a really big eye. The more you know.
Oh, so only the big eye gets any positive attention now!
What about all the eye stalks doing all the important work while that giant ball hog in the middle steals all of the credit?!?!
she's a smoke show, dude
shes half indian, so I understand the director
You want to challenge beauty standards? Cast Steve Buscemi as Geralt and Lizzo as Yennifer.
Wtf Steve Buscemi is hot af
There's a meme comparing him to Angelina Jolie and while I personally don't think she's hot, a vast majority of people do, ergo Steve is objectively and undeniably the most attractive man on earth.
Is this the women from Mr Robot or do I suck at faces?
Are you confusing her for Carly Chaikin?
I was and it is now confirmed I suck at faces.
Thanks.
Tbf, they do have similar faces. They both did a solid job in their roles imho, just the occasional over-acting.
They have two eyes, a nose and mouth, are visibly female. That is about as similar as you can get.
They have a somewhat similar facial structure, I think. Especially in the eyes, nose and mouth. Cheekbones a bit different but still similar.
"I have non white friends"
It seems like a lot of people are just not reading the article or the context of the quote:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2023/07/27/the-witcher-casting-director-says-yennefer-casting-was-to-challenge-beauty-standards-which-is-completely-insane/
Emphasis is mine.