Why is firefox losing market share? Why don't more people use Firefox?

Maddison@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.ml – 511 points –

edited the heading of the question. I think most of us here are reasoning why more people are not using firefox (because it was the initial question), but none of that explains why it's actively losing marketshare.

I don't agree ideologically with Firefox management and am somewhat of a semi-conservative (and my previous posts might testify to that), I think Firefox browser is absolutely amazing! It's beautiful and it just feels good. It has awesome features like containers. It's better for privacy than any mainstream browser out there (even counting Brave here) and it has great integration between PC and Phone. It's open-source (unlike Chrome) and it supports a good chunk of extensions you would need.

This was about PC, but I believe even for Mobiles it looks great and it allows features like extensions (and I hear desktop extensions are coming to firefox android?), it's just a great ecosystem and it's available everywhere unlike most FOSS softwares.

So why is Firefox's market share dying?

I mean, I have a few ideas why it might be, maybe correct me I guess?

  1. Most people don't know how to use extensions well and how to use Firefox well. (Most of my friends in their 30's still live without ad blockers, so I don't think many are educated here)
  2. It's just not as fast as Chrome or Brave. I can't deny this, but despite of this, I find it's worthy.
  3. It's not the default.
  4. Many features which are Google specific aren't supported.
  5. Many websites are just not supporting firefox anymore (looking at you snapchat), but you would be right in saying this is the effect of Firefox losing it's market share not the cause (at least for now) and you would be right.

But what else?

I might take time (a lot of it) to get back at you, thanks for understanding.

occasionally I’ll find websites that don’t work 100% because they were coded primarily for chromium based browsers. FU Google

282

"Most people" probably can't name the browser they use. They just open "the internet" on whatever device they're on.

Then why isn't Edge more popular?

This isn't the early 2000s anymore; people know how to download a browser.

Most don't. Edge is increasingly becoming more popular as consumers switch to Windows 11.

The only non-techies I know that use Chrome are those I have installed Chrome for.

Most people who "just use the computer" these days DO use edge, in my experience.

All the older non tech people I interact with use phones and iPads almost exclusively. They boot up PCs (iMacs too) from 10 years ago once a year during tax time.

I see you never worked help desk before.

People are way dumber about tech than you think.

So many times I see screenshots shared by my non-IT friends of websites and it's full of ads. Trying to get them to install an adblocker is a real challenge. Some of these people are actual engineers too, so fairly smart people otherwise. The "internet" is whatever browser is on their PC that works.

Also, a lot of people are using absolute potato PCs where the performance difference between Edge/Chrome and anything else used to be noticeable for years.

I’ve seen it plenty of times that they use chrome AND edge. Simply because some things open in edge by default and they don’t know how to, or aren’t bothered to switch it.

Most does use it. It just come with some weird quirks, like my cousin's Edge wiped itself clean after a Windows update, and I guided him towards FF

i feel like edge is thought to be internet explorer so the non tech people are like im gonna be a tech guy and get chrome.

Ugh, sadly I feel like this is the most accurate answer. So many people don't apply critical thinking to their device and don't even understand they are using a browser to access the web.

Yeah, but ya know, people shouldn't be required to "apply critical thinking" to what is effectively a passthrough device for them. Do you consider the choice of lubricant used for the serpentine belt in your car? Car dudes would say "ugh people should apply more critical thinking to their car"

Technology should be reasonable and functional, even if you're not invested in the details

1 more...

I've never experienced any slowness with Firefox, so I don't know what people are talking about. But Chrome is still the default browser on Android and I guess it's the major reason why people are installing Chrome on their computer.

It's improved a lot recently and even surpasses Chrome in some benchmarks, but it took them a really really long time to catch up with Chrome's speed.

Chrome split up web pages into their own processes very early on, while Firefox still had to mostly run things single threaded. That made a huge difference especially on laptops with 4-8 slow threads.

Chrome also turned to the GPU for acceleration really early on too. That's also something Firefox took a really long time to catch up with.

Like many, I've been on Chromium since the single digit days, and only switched back to Firefox in anticipation of the manifest v3 fiasco.

Chrome was just way too good to not use it. Chrome beat the shit out of Firefox the way Firefox beat the shit out of IE6 back then. It was so good I sucked up the lack of extensions or Flash Player support. It was faster to load ads than use Firefox to block them.

You've hit the major notes that made the biggest difference to switching in the early days. Worth mentioning too that in order to sow that field, chromium, then billed as an open source project, lifted much of those never IE power users out of Firefox specifically as well.

Similarly, if you want patrons to tell others what's great about your new restaurant, give them at least three good things to evangelize for you.

Fast. Freebies. Friendly.

Back then, Chrome crushed it. Today, it's equivalent to a joint being oversaturated with lazy managers taking advantage of gullible, unskilled teenagers and wondering why the whole place's gone to shit.

Firefox outperforms in all the key areas IMO. It's honestly a pretty cool space.

I agree majority of the regular people don't even install a second browser on their device. My brother use chrome on android and edge on windows. Sad, but he likes it enough. I use firefox on all my devices. Because of the implication.

can anything be done legally about Chrome being the default browser on most android phones? I mean, there has to be some default browser but maybe Android manufacturers should be forced to pre-install a FOSS browser instead of chrome ig, idk (or maybe the user can be asked to install it when they are logging into their phones for the first time, this sounds better)

Iirc the some people in the EU wanted to take a look at googles almost-monopoly on the android market but I don’t think anything came out of it. It’s virtually no different from MS using Edge as default browser on Windows; as long as you can get an alternative, there isn’t anything wrong with it legally.

iirc, they already had to impelement, that you can choose the default search engine in Androids first setup.

Because not only do you (the end user) have to go out of your way to get it, but you get spammed by Microsoft/Edge and Google/Chrome to install a "faster" and "more secure" browser. Additionally, on the mobile side, Apple is preventing all iPhone/iPad users from picking a real alternative browser that isn't just webkit re-skinned, putting half the population at a disadvantage and to their own corporate interests.

The Apple part might change quite soon, with the EU’s Digital Market Act. Apple will have to allow users to download apps from other markets than the Appstore.

That would be great! Hopefully they don't screw it up and decide to make the feature available only if you're in the EU.

They're absolutely going to make it available only in the EU unless other countries also push for it with legislation.

It's also going to have a lot of scary "Are you sure u want to compromise your safety?" boxes.

Don’t get your hopeS. JIT compilation is an integral part of all modern JavaScript engines, and JIT compilation requires violating the static W^X principle that is currently mandated by iOS for security. Not to mention that allowing third party browser engines would probably increase Blink’s (Chrome, Edge) market share more than Gecko’s.

What do you mean about the apple part? I use FF on my iPhone.

It's uses safari's engine, which is the only one allowed by Apple. Doesn't matter what browser you download from the store.

All browsers on iOS are just reskinned Safari, because that's the only thing iOS allows you to install.

This is a really great reason not to use iOS.

I think you think too much, most people just want a browser that works and they have one preinstalled on their phone / computer. So when you arrive and recommend Firefox they just hear "Hey ! You have a browser that works, why won't you spend time installing this one that works just as fine, I swear".

Extensions and privacy might look like killer features but they are a bit too abstract to be adoption arguments (why would you even need extensions if your browser is so good).

Spent twenty years burning out every committed advocate with broken extensions, UI whack-a-mole, random half-baked corporate decisions, and finally just giving up and being "like Chrome but."

Meanwhile Google engages in blatant anti-competitive behavior to claw ever more market-share away from everything and everyone, and American politics are too much of a dumpster fire to stop them.

Literally the only other browsers that are other browsers are Firefox and Safari, and people only use Safari because iOS is a prison. iPhone users will insist their reskinned Safari webview is-too Firefox or Chrome or whatever, and then wonder why anyone makes a big deal about browsers when everything they've tried works exactly the same.

Yup. If I used iOS, I'd probably use Brave because it seems to be the only one with an ad blocker.

But I don't use iOS, so I use Firefox with an ad blocker installed, and I think it's great. But I can't really recommend mobile Firefox because many of my coworkers use iOS and that recommendation won't work for them.

So if someone asks what to use, I need to ask what platform they're on. And that sucks.

Safari on iOS supports extensions as of the last couple years, and AdGuard is available for it. Works great!

Good to hear!

I just wish they would allow other browser engines on iOS.

Yeah, that'd definitely be another big improvement. At least Safari doesn't add to Chrome's marketshare though

I used to use Firefox before Chrome came out, because it was better than IE. When Chrome came out it was a breath of fresh air. A real third option! (konqueror didn't really count). And it was faster, cleaner, lighter than Firefox. Just better at everything. So I installed it on all of my family's computers, which they allowed me to do because IE by then was so bad it was an obvious improvement even for the layman.

Then in the intervening years Firefox dwindled to basically no market share and IE died, so now Chrome isn't a third option, it's the only option. And so I switched back to Firefox basically as a political sacrifice, but there's no way I'm going to be able to convince any of my family to switch because Firefox isn't better for them in any perceivable way. It's just different and they don't care. If Firefox had 30% market share I'd almost definitely be using Chromium still myself.

So probably that, but a million times. There was a period where every nerd moved all their associated people to Chrome because it was new, great, and non-dominant. It was hip and indie. And now they're still there and there's no reason for them to move that they care about.

konqueror didn't really count

But Konqueror is where we got Webkit from!

Opera was also an option... I used Opera from ~2003 until when they switched to Chrome's engine (2012 I think?)

Netscape had the best gif-icon though, that star fall was gorgeous

I'll admit I used to use Konqueror for a while. Plus I much preferred it as a file browser to Dolphin (even now I begrudgingly accept Dolphin). Problem for me was always plugins. I've used most browsers under the sun, but I can't ethically support Chrome or Edge. I remember early versions of NS and AMosaic, Phoenix, Firebird (the latter two were what Firefox used to be called).

I will openly admit Mozilla has made some huge "WTF?" calls though. They alienated a lot of people with some of their design/technical decisions that I think fucked them more than they realised.

I've basically made my parents use firefox for 15 years now. With adblocking and cookie warning disabled and stuff like that. Since a few years they're more and more on the iPhone, not on laptop with firefox... "why are there so many advertisements on the phone? Can't you fix it like on the laptop?" Nope. I can't, you chose iPhone. Had no idea all these years how much they were shielded from bs by firefox. For an average user it just boils down to 'it's too complicated', use whatever shit software they force on them and don't ask fundamental questions... Firefox became the browser for privacy nerds, lost its mainstream appeal in the period that chrome definitely was a lot faster and smoother and was still a bit less evil corp about addons

Firefox being slow has almost nothing to do with Mozilla's incompetence or the browser's inability to handle websites.

When devs build websites, they usually build them for the most popular browser, aka Chrome. They couldn't be bothered to help the minority of people who use Firefox. Also, cost. Building a website to work with 2 different engines is more expensive than building it for just one engine that'll work for 99% of users. That's why a lot of banking websites never support FF.

Another primary reason is Google's Monopoly. Almost everyone uses some Google service or another. Google's websites are tailored to perfectly fit Chromium, not FF. This is why you'll sometimes see websites break or even crash. YouTube's recent ambient mode made the site choke quite a lot on FF. An average Joe ain't got the knowledge to know or even troubleshoot the issue and they'll just shift to Chromium, where everything just works.

It's almost like web is built on open technologies, and you would expect the same code to run without issues on different engines.

Until one engine goes berserk because they know they can and no one will stop them.

Was this an AI answer or something? It's really weird to go out of your way to bold all the brand names...

Firefox is not a worse browser, it's just the lack of visibility. You have to want to install Firefox to try it, the only exception I know it's in Linux where most of the time it's the default browser. Google Chrome, on the other hand, is promoted each time you search anything in Google without Google Chrome.

I thought "wait a second, I've never seen this", before realizing I haven't used Google for probably almost a decade now. I'm out of touch I guess

Declining market share and dying are not at all the same thing. Remember that FOSS can survive without resources tha M$ and ABC have.

Anyway, what do you mean you're conservative? I don't understand at all. What values pushed you to what browsers? Laziness and defaults, maybe, but that's a different position.

what do you mean you're conservative?

He means "waah waah! They're oppressing me by not agreeing with me!!!" Conservatives hate the consequences of their actions.

Eh, even as someone who on a global political scale is left leaning, I've been hesitant to donate to Mozilla. I'd love to support the browser development, but the fact that they siphon off money from that to support political activities and organizations (especially when some of them are downright corrupt, like BLM) turns me off from that.

When I want to donate to a political organization, I'll do that directly. What I want Mozilla to do, most of all, is keep firefox (and by extension gecko) alive, and thereby maintain internet freedom.

Maintaining a browser for the modern web is a massive undertaking that needs funding.

Firefox does not have a way to force them into it.

  • ChromeOS - Chrome only. Default. Google.com beggs you to get an account and try Chrome. Android, comes with Android preinstalled.
  • Windows - Annoying Try Edge popup force them during boot. Bing Chat is Edge Only.

Many Linux distributions include Firefox as a default browser, but GNU/Linux is not very popular on desktop either...

I was using Firefox before Chrome when it took significant market share from Internet Explorer.

In my view a large reason was corporations made the (IMO) big mistake of using Chrome for applications and as a browser.

It’s the classic Microsoft effect of people get comfortable using it at work and then don’t change.

It also doesn’t hurt that Chrome is tied to the majority of smart phones.

I use Firefox everywhere, but there are a few main issues that stop me from converting people...

  • The lack of tab groups. This seems silly, but most people I know, especially on mobile, keep a lot of tabs open. If they're researching something, or shopping for something they'll leave 20 tabs open. Having that in one tab group in Chrome is a better way to organize than just tons of tabs.
  • Sites that don't work well on Firefox. Again, specifically on mobile I run into sites that work on Chrome but not on Firefox.
  • General stability issues. I need to force close Firefox once or twice a day because it will just fail to load pages.

Once or twice a day!? That's crazy, I wonder if others have this problem as well. I use Firefox on PC, Linux, Android, and IpadOS and I've never even approached stability issues that bad. My assumption is there's something wrong with your device...

This has been going on for years across multiple devices. Basically since the rewrite. Only on Android, never on Linux.

I love using Firefox. Have been loyal user for over 15 years. But quite a few sites just don't work as intended... including online banking, city government etc. The issue has grown a lot in recent years. It's a pickle to adjust addons for every site with issues, so j just use chrome or Edge or whatever and keep the firefox settings optimised for ad free cookie warning free trackerless experience in newspaper, YouTube etc. To me it's inconvenience is just a regular reminder that Internet has gone to shit and more and more sites contain a shitload of unnecessary bullshit no one asked for

These in my experience are always because of your privacy settings, resist fingerprinting is a good one.

I run Firefox with a hardened config and with a few privacy and security extensions so I run into this all the time. It’s frustrating sure but I usually just pop open edge, do what I need to and then close it out.

I try not to make a habit of sacrificing security and privacy for convenience unfortunately for Chrome and chromium.

Tab groups would really be nice. I don’t know why they don’t just implement it for Firefox already, even though it’s not a big deal.

There’s an extension for that

There's not a good enough™ one. Genuinely that's the biggest thing I miss using Firefox over chrome

This is it exactly. The ones that exist are ok, but not on par with what chrome provides. That said, I still use Firefox whenever possible

Firefox was long the No 2 browser, then Chrome came along at the time that Google was cool and they actually marketed it with TV ads. It looked cooler and more modern, it had some innovative features... Firefox never recovered

People forget that chrome brought v8 with it. Without v8 chrome would have just been another hat in the ring for browsers.

V8 took JavaScript from being this little thing that did some light ajax stuff in the background, and made it the star of the show. It allowed entire applications to run in the front end with no installation. Firefox and IE couldn't match the speeds chrome could do.

Chrome running each tab in a separate process was a big deal for sites being able to have more application-like functionality without bugs slowing or crashing the whole browser.

Firefox took seven years to catch up with its own multiprocess implementation.

Old timer here.

In the old days Microsoft essentially conquered the web by creating specialized features only available for their web browser.

This is the reason why we still suffer with IE compatibility mode in Edge. A lot of corporations still have systems that rely on clients being IE compatible.

Google essentially does the same with their services and Chrome.

I do not see any killer feature of Firefox right now. Even the Mozilla's official browser comparison site indicates Microsoft Edge being on par with Firefox, based on Mozilla's own criteria!
This will change in the future. Firefox will be the only major web browser on Android with full-fledged addon support.
I am already using some extensions on Vivaldi (like Consent-o-Matic, some transliteration addons), but this could make me switch to Firefox.

They could also have put in an "Possibility to disable telemetry and tracking from browser vendor"

Support for mv2 uBO is the killer feature of Firefox and its forks.

This, when chrome starts to prevent adblocking, which is coming in the next few months, i predict firefox will see a pretty big uptick in usage.

The killer feature is cookie containers, aka no cross site tracking by default.

Less bloat and the direction of the browser. They've been around forever and they have a consistent track record. Vivaldi is a good example of why it's bad to cram every single feature into a browser creates clutter. Not to mention you're supporting the only non-Chromium browser, which we're seeing the disastrous effects of their monopoly pushing user harmful changes.

Multi account containers is the reason I use Firefox over ungoogled chromium

I work in IT and had to abandon Firefox because of compatibility issues that came up on a regular basis. it appears companies are simply not using it as part of their QA anymore. Also, in general the GUI theming has issues for me with the font and distinguishing highlights with my crappy vision. I tried every theme out there and for some reason apparently people writing themes just don't care to make it so you can see what is highlighted and what is not. Even The default theme sucks in my opinion. There were a number of other nits that I just kept having issues with - getting prompted on eBay to verify my identity for no reason, repeatedly, which doesn't happen on chromium and stuff like that.

I wish Apple would adopt the Firefox rendering engine and take Safari cross platform. It would give Firefox a fighting chance at the overall market.

Corporations hate freedom. Imagine that.

Or they just expend their effort on the browsers that 96% of people use and not the one that 4% use. I love Firefox, but I don't think this is the conspiracy you're claiming it is.

Yep. I try to use Firefox and Safari as much as possible to get away from Chrome, but they just aren't as good. They're slow and clunky and don't get me the information I need. I really wish Apple would do something about Safari. They're the only ones with other ways to make money than our information.

Number 3 is by far the most important, because most people just don't think about what web browser they're using. A lot of people don't even think about web browsers at all. They just think of the web browser app as "the internet", and that's it.

Firefox is honestly just kinda always lagging behind on supporting features. If you want to use the latest tech, Chrome is always first to have it.

One that irks me a lot of the lack of any proper PWA support. On both mobile and desktop, you can install websites as apps, and they behave like apps. Slack, Discord, Spotify, YouTube Music, and a whole bunch of others you can install as a PWA and they look just like their desktop counterparts but much lighter, they're sandboxed and safer to use, and generally perform well. You click an external link on Slack as a PWA? It opens in a new regular browser window. Push notifications get routed to the correct window when you click/tap on it.

Firefox can do that with extremely hacky extensions on desktop, and just can't on mobile. Best it can do is make a shortcut. But if you receive a notification it opens it in a new tab in the browser, it's just not nearly as good of an experience.

I rely a lot on PWAs like The Lounge to use IRC as my primary messaging app. I could wrap it in a dummy Cordova app or something but then it's still running Chrome under the hood anyway, because Firefox also doesn't support being Android's WebView plugin.

That's changing but Firefox on mobile currently only supports like a dozen extensions and that's it, you can't even force install them unless you run nightly builds.

Firefox's engine was also extremely laggy on mobile but that fortunately has also improved a fair bit recently.

Then there's all the useless features literally nobody asked for like Pocket, sponsored links in the new tab page, Mozilla VPN, and other addons they bought over time with questionable privacy policies. Just make the browser good before you venture into other bloatware.

Firefox just hasn't had any reason to be used in recent years other than not being related to Google/Chromium. And even then, we've had ungoogled Chromium forks since the beginning. It's the political party you picked for the sake of being against the other worse one.

Firefox PWAs seem to work for me on mobile. To be fair I'm on nightly, but I can see a menu item that says "install" if the webpage has a PWA manifest. I was using voyager with it for a while before they released the play store version.

Yeah I had the same experience with PWAs for a while now and I'm not on the nightly.

Internet Explorer / Edge is not complete garbage anymore, that's not helping for sure. Also, there was a period where Firefox was actually kinda lacking. That's in the past since the "Quantum" update I'd say.

I have been using FF for at least 10 years. Tried many of the others. Always come back.

I have told others about it but people rarely make the change even if they see it is better....

It's fast enough on any remotely modern hardware.

Personally I love the ability to still pimp it out with style sheets.

And yeah, Mozilla has so many, many problems. In many ways they have become Google's pet, IMO. But most importantly they are not Google.

I think when Chrome came out Google was still a cool, hip company and Chrome fixed a lot of issues Firefox had. I used it for years. So they managed to become the normie cultural default. These people are hard to change habit-wise.

I could be wrong though. Just sort of thinking out loud.

My path was the same - there was a time when FF was messing up badly trying to keep up with Chrome, and that's when I switched to Chrome. FF then cleaned up their act, but the damage was done. Or it might simply have been that Chrome was so much slicker (and not evil) at the time. I went back to FF around the time Google merged all accounts with Chrome accounts, and I much prefer it to Chrome now. I'm sad to see it not being able to regain its past glory and serious traction. I blame it mostly on convenience, inertia and "normies" generally not carrying about the same things as some "techies".

remotely modern hardware.

yeah have to disagree with you there. I bought a laptop very recently (a few months ago) and it was a new release equipped with everything one might think as "modern" firefox still can't beat brave or chrome.

What were you doing on it if you don't mind me asking.

I use it on a 5 year old low powered laptop and have no issues.

it's "fast enough" alright, just not fast as brave or chrome. You know I have been using firefox for so long that I gave a search query on brave and it felt like it was lightning fast. I mean, I just pressed and enter and suddenly something unexpected happened, it loaded fast af and I was surprised. Firefox does load pages fast enough, but brave was lightning fast and that surprised me.

Honestly I use brave from time to time as my backup browser and I have never noticed the difference.

I think the performance issue would not be related to loading simple pages. It seems like it would be more noticeable when running load-demanding web apps.

Firefox is kinda like Linux in my opinion. Yes, some games might not run on linux and some games don't run as good as on windows, but most run just fine. But since I don't use windows I don't know the difference and so I don't care about it either. Same thing with firefox, chrome might do x better, but then I have not used it in years so I just don't care about it. Blissful ignorance I suppose? Either way I am happy with linux and firefox since both have not only downsides, but plenty advantages too in my opinion.

I'd guess that:

  • Google is a bigger brand that attracts many people as a lot of them are already using some of the company's products
  • These other products are well integrated with the browser: browser history is shared across devices along with passwords and extensions
  • Google advertises Chrome in the Google Search, it's a default search engine even in Firefox

Most people are not tech savvy and/or privacy-oriented.

I use Firefox, but the above #2 is why I almost switch back. Since using Firefox, my password manager is becoming a mess on mobile because my phone uses Google manager and my browser uses Firefox. That by itself is almost worth paying for YouTube premium for me.

Why make the effort to switch to Firefox, if the browser that came installed with your device works?

Or, more realistically, people don't even grok the concept of a web browser.

Bingo. We live in the smartphone era where the average user cannot differentiate between facebook (the app) and internet (the web).

Firefox on Android removed the feature to open local html files. No, I'm not interested in running a webserver on a phone for local files lol.

Switched to Vivaldi.

Why would you browse local html files on a phone?? That being said why would they remove such a basic feature??

Why wouldn't I browse html files on the device that is the most portable and conveniently always by my side? When I may not have internet access?

One file that I use constantly is a simple html file which sends tasmota URLs to control my smart devices. Who needs apps? lol. I also frequently refer to personal wiki html files on my devices. And there's a few html manuals I need to refer to...

Thanks for replying, I'm spoiled with constant internet access and didn't think about being offline.

Back when IE was on top and Firefox was the best browser, firefox started to put a lot of bad updates, then chrome came, it was faster and firefox started to lose its marketshare, for while firefox only peformed well on linux, by the time quantum came out and it's performance was good on windows again, Chrome was already the new IE, but Google is way better at managing this leadership it than Microsoft ever was, the only technical problem it has is devouring RAM.

In my opinion, gecko being so tied to the browser is also a problem. There's a ton of browsers using Blink, that gives google a lot of control over how the web will evolve. Having other browsers using gecko that aren't Firefox forks would be great.

One reason is that if you use Gmail, every two weeks appears a "y u no use chrome" nag popup that can't be permanently dismissed

If I’ve ever seen this message, I don’t remember it. Crazy what uBlock Origin can do for one’s peace of mind.

I've used Firefox for years and I love it on Android, but on my work laptop (MacBook) I really enjoy using Arc. The vertical tabs let me organise things better, the spaces let me isolate tabs properly in a visually pleasing way, and I don't really care for extensions on desktop as I don't really browse much outside of work. I also prefer chromium dev tools, though it isn't that bad to switch to Firefox's dev tools.

If Firefox adopts few features from Arc, both in form and function, I wouldn't mind coming back. I know sidebar exists which lets you have vertical tabs via extensions, but damn Arc does it the best so far, natively!

Edit: oh, another reason was lack of background blur effects for Google meet. It's coming soon I think (I filed it on bugzilla), but damn it was needed like 3 years ago.

Let me introduce you to the fabulous world of TreeStyleTabs.

I did check it and it is pretty cool. Though you've to use user css to hide actual tabs and even then it isn't as polished experience as Arc. I guess it is one of the features that needs to be part of browser chrome to be really good.

I also prefer chromium dev tools, though it isn’t that bad to switch to Firefox’s dev tools.

I actually vastly prefer Firefox's dev tools to Chromium's. There are keyboard shortcuts to open every tab, it has a color picker, it has a multi-line Javascript console, and in general I find it more intuitive. Chromium developer tools seem to be less complete than Firefox and harder to use.

I just learned Chromium technically has a color picker tool, but you need to scroll through CSS propetries to find a color selector, click the color, then click the color picker. With Firefox, I tap CTRL+SHIFT+I to open dev tools, click the color picker which is front-and-center, and it copies the hex code to my clipboard. This is a microcosm of my overall experience with Chromium's developer tools. Everything is slower or further out of reach.

I don't know how it ended up this way.

You're right, Firefox does make its menus more accessible. What is good about Chromium is that it has command pallette, so you can just type away what you want and it's done. Maybe that's why the stuff is burried behind menus in Chromium.

Ah, I can see how that might be useful. I first learned about the command pallette when I needed to instruct everyday users on taking a full-page screenshot on Chrome...it's far more complicated than Firefox's method of Right-Click > Take Screenshot. Just another odd thing, lol. Interestingly, Firefox is considering implementing this feature: https://github.com/firefox-devtools/ux/issues/101

I don't think it would make much sense in my workflow right now but I can see how it would benefit others. Quickly turning on accessibility constraints I'm sure would be very useful. One thing Firefox's dev tools is desperately missing is search. I get along fine without it, but it would be nice to have.

Same here, I used Firefox for a long time but Arc just captured me with its beauty and polish. Sideberry for Firefox kinda replicates the vertical tab experience, but man it's so much better when the solution is native to the app.

For me, until all below are supported Firefox can't be my primary browser.

  1. PWA not supported and only possible with FirefoxPWA. I can't rely to anything but native, Mozilla could break FirefoxPWA any time they want.
  2. I use my browser for my multimedia needs and I use my own Emby Server. Firefox doesn't support mkv container and the most important it desn't support HEVC. Please do not tell me about HEVC royalties and how much Mozilla would have to pay MPEG-LA. Chromium based browsers have enabled hardware HEVC decoding and they pay nothing to MPEG-LA because the royalties have been already payed by my graphics card. Mozilla simply doesn't care.

Yeah, not having a PWAs is a bummer

idk what you guys are on about, PWAs work fine for me.

you must be in an alternate universe

pehaps.

I mean I even developed a few for my previous employer. I think chrome is just more permissive with the config and people settle when chrome works. Since I dev on firefox, maybe that's why my apps worked.

hmm, maybe were area talking about different things

I'm talking about "installing" any website as an app, and your OS treat it like an independent app

pwa it's just a browser shortcut without the toolbar and you install it from the browser if the page provides info about that.

Mozilla could break FirefoxPWA any time they want.

That seems to be a very shallow argument ... besides the point that any software can break at some point, chrome/google is even actively breaking compatability, think Mv2 or jpegXL support for example.

IMO Mozilla is less likely to intentionaly break support without giving the user and developers a good reason and if possible with enough time to adjust/workaround the necessary changes.

I use my browser for my multimedia needs

Most people would use a mediaplayer application for this ...

First of all jpegxl was an experimental flag and option in chromium, it never made it as a "real" feature in chromium based browsers. Find a better example, that ain't it.
About your other comment, you have no idea how popular Plex, Jellyfin and Emby are. In desktop if they use Firefox they are stuck at re-encoding their videos on the fly to h264 and waste resources and quality. Many of them have no idea that chromium based browsers now support directplay on hevc. Everyday many of them are informed and leave Firefox.

Find a better example, that ain’t it.

So i assume you agree that Mv2 is a valid example, since you did not reply to that. 👍

Everyday many of them are informed and leave Firefox.

If you have evidence for this i'd say that it would be a good move to open an idea on https://connect.mozilla.org (if there isnt one already) and maybe also try and find and link existing bugzilla issues to it. - Maybe those can be re-opened/prioritized. - Since you seem sure that many people need this, the request should get a large amount of votes/support in a short time and will surely get noticed by mozilla too.

Good luck. 👍

Yes, mv2 is a good example. But not a deal breaker for me because most chromium based browsers have a NATIVE adblocker on them. NATIVE adlocking, you know... ablocking that will never break because Chrome, Edge or Firefox don't have NATIVE adbloking on them and you have to rely on extensions for that.
There is demand for hevc. Just have a look at Jeffylin, Emby or Plex forums. No, Mozilla doesn't care, they have been mulitple requests and they close them all with RESOLVED WONTFIX. People won't keep begging Mozilla, they are just switching to another browser.

Lets gather some facts ...

Quotes from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1332136

Mozilla currently has no plans to support H.265. Our focus will be on AV1.

Makes sense, since mozilla has limited amount of resources available and has to prioritize.

We will not support h265 video while its patent encumbered.

This is another matter which is understandable. Who invest work into something that you might not be allowed to use.

So far seems like reasonable understandable decision. I think i would do the same in their shoes and only change/revise my decision if i get a strong impulse/feedback from the community or something else changes that might impact the the 2 points.

But lets dig around a little further

https://caniuse.com/hevc

Seems like you are right that most other browsers support it, so that might be a good argument to make for an idea on connect.

HEVC is a proprietary format and is covered by a number of patents. Licensing is managed by MPEG LA; fees are charged to developers rather than to content producers and distributors. Be sure to review the latest license terms and requirements before making a decision on whether or not to use HEVC in your app or website!

src. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Media/Formats/Video_codecs#hevc_h.265

This might be the biggest hurdle but maybe having it integrated as a loadable module like widevine would be an options that could be something to propose and dicuss. Maybe that would help with the whole license situation, but not sure.

old reddit discussion about the topic https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/zeg2qy/firefox_doesnt_support_h265_hevc_for_patent/

Seems like at least some people are intersted, as you said.

And a last idea, maybe you could ask around in the communities of some of the other firefox forks ... waterfox, librewolf ... and see what the situation and stance is ... maybe one already has a solution/support.

They are focused on AV1. Good, I will focused on it in future, I hope it beats MPEG-LA's VVC.
That's not the point, in case you don't know everybody is focusing on AV1 including Google.
Google is actually the main developer of AV1.
Nobody asks from Mozilla to include software HEVC decoding. They would have to pay a lot of money for it and honestly they shouldn't give to MPEG-LA a single dollar.
They could do what Chromium has done and include ONLY hardware decoding support.
Chromium pays nothing to MPEG-LA for that because they use our own hardware, our graphics card, and the manufacturer of the graphics card has already paid for it.
I also don't see any issue coming from it with widevine, if there isn't any issue from it in Chromium, I don't see why it would cause issues only to Firefox.
They proparly don't have the resources to include support for it. Totally understandable. But I will be selfish on this, my choice of my primary browser would be based on my needs....

They could do what Chromium has done and include ONLY hardware decoding support.

Who knows maybe even that is seen as too much effort in regards to the cost of development or it just isn't seen as a good enough effort investment because they are sure that AV1 (or something else) will replace it in the near future. - I am not sure but i dont remember an explicit statement in regards to passthough hardware support, but i might just have missed it.

But I will be selfish on this, my choice of my primary browser would be based on my needs…

Absolutely! - If this feature is more important to you than anything else firefox currently provides to you, like ...

  • last bastion against googles/chromiums browser monopoly
  • awesome total cookie protection
  • best adblocker support with uBlock Origin
  • multi account containers
  • customizable UI (userChrome.css)
  • addon ecosystem (addons.mozilla.org) not hindert by googles Mv3 modifications or riddelt with malicious addons
  • a browser thats created by a non-profit that might actually care about protecting its users from harm and tracking instead of trying to exploit them even in the long term

... just to name some, then i dont see any reason why you should not switch.

Maybe if you like just sometimes check back and see if your priorities/needs and/or firefox might have changed and match up again.

Anyway, whatever you decide, i wish you a nice day and hope you find a solution that works for you.

Websites glitch out more often on Firefox. I had my favorite Mastodon instance not letting me scroll back up because of some weird jittering bug that only applies to Firefox for some reason.

Photoshop Web (Beta) only supports Chromium-based browsers, Descript only supports Chromium-based browsers (well, Firefox still seems to work but you're on your own), and many new webapps are only supporting Chromium-based browsers. Now, these are beta products, so that might change, but it seems unlikely. So I've been switching to Chromium-based browsers to use some of these apps, but I'd really rather not. It's the way everything is going, unfortunately.

A lot of developers target the web because it means they can have one codebase that is supported on multiple operating systems. Imagine how much harder it would be to develop a macOS, ChromeOS and GNU/Linux version in concert with the Windows version. In reality, some browser engines support more web features than others, and Google has by far the most resources to keep up with those standards. So Firefox is an afterthought. Google Chrome is on every operating system worth supporting anyway, so why bother supporting another browser? It's a lot less work and testing.

MDN is the best place to read about those standards, though.

I like Firefox:

  • userChrome.css lets me make Firefox look like a GNOME program
  • I much prefer the developer tools. Everything is a lot easier. I always use Firefox when doing web development.
  • I can easily customize the browser. For me, this means having a separate dedicated URL bar and search engine bar.
    • The search engine bar lets me swap between search engines very quickly and keep my previous search terms for new tabs. Switching search engines is really annoying in Chromium-based browsers because you need to use shortcuts, and there's no autocomplete for shortcuts. It also doesn't tell you whether you typed the shortcut correctly, so you're guessing every time! It's really under-developed. The Android Chromium-based browsers are even worse. You can't change search engines at all when searching; you need to change your default engine. Firefox lets you search any search engine easily on iOS, and slightly less easily on Android.
  • I can...turn off history? Apparently this is an amazingly complex feature that Chromium-based browsers just can't handle. The best you can do is clear it when exiting, but you can't just turn history off.

Okay, it's mostly the search engine thing, to be honest.

But Firefox still doesn't use the new GNOME thumbnail view when you're uploading files, for example...

I didn't find the performance gap really high when I switched from Chromium to Firefox. Even on my shitty old laptop, Firefox works fine. I have to admit though that it uses way too much memory.

I do agree with your 3rd point though. History has taught us that defaults matter a lot. Firefox isn't a default anywhere apart from linux distros and FirefoxOS was a failure.

This after they fix the ReactDOM and some JS Performance a year back, before that on potato laptop, the performance is really-really bad..

Firefox works fine. I have to admit though that it uses way too much memory

is that why it works fine? I mean, I know it uses too much memory, but is why it's comparable to chrome, because more memory usage means it's faster or something (I am a noob)

In theory you can use memory to precompute almost everything as an acceleration technique. For example, imagine you're asked to do integer division (in some range, let's say 0 to 100) without hardware acceleration. Now you could precompute all 0 to 100 by 0 to 100 division options (10000 total), and store the result of all of them in memory. The next time you're asked to divide these numbers, you can look up the answer in memory instead of having to do the computation.

This is always a tradeoff using many heuristics and guesses for what's worth precomputing and what's a waste. Then there are also systems used (by for example Chrome) where the app looks at available RAM and stores more precomputations if the PC has more RAM.

But no, this is not why Firefox works fine. There was a rewrite of Firefox's rendering engine a few years ago, search for "Firefox Quantum" if you want to know more. They shifted to heavy GPU acceleration, which brought it on par with if not above Chrome's rendering performance.

The big issue with Firefox is that the Android app still feels unpolished, and people like to use one browser across devices for password/bookmark sync etc. They simply don't have the manpower to compete with Android Chrome, which has the entirety of Google behind it. It's basically their flagship product combining Search Engine, Android OS, Chromium and Material Design all at once.

I've been using Firefox on Android forever and it has absolitely no downsides in my experience, it works perfectly

Finding one specific tab using their collection system is much more annoying than Chrome's tab groups for organization, with nice drag-and-drop animations for each group.

Pull to refresh bugs out on some pages and triggers when trying to scroll up, so I have to keep it disabled, meaning reloading a page is super difficult.

There's a problem with multi-line text boxes where my text goes in the next line when I try to type inside of an existing paragraph.

And these are just 3 random annoyances I find with Firefox. I've used it for two years after they brought quantum to Android, and now switched back to Chrome. Firefox Mobile is usable but nowhere near the level of polish as Chrome, and it adds up for an app I use multiple hours every day for years.

I use AdGuard DNS so I don't have ads in either browser.

If you've been on youtube for the past 6 months or so, there were a lot of OperaGX sponsorships given to large creators and a decent majority of people have used it, liked it, and started recommending it to others via youtube comments.

There's also the fact that chrome is the browser that, at least here, is the most well known at this point and is usually preinstalled on school computers, so this builds up familiarity.

And probably a smaller reason why is because mozilla itself - it hasn't been that great of a company and the firefox over the years has gotten somewhat worse and worse.

I still miss the print a webpage to pdf on mobile firefox.

It's already a feature on Firefox Mobile (Android, 116.3).

Aha, bottom of the share options! Didn't notice it's back. Thanks!

Because the U.S. government used the 2001 Microsoft Internet Explorer Antitrust hearings to blackmail Microsoft into government servitude: implanting NSA backdoors, not patching vulnerabilities, disabling system administration tools, constantly hiding or moving useful features. Remember from the Snowden leaks that the NSA's favorite prey is the System and/or Network Administrator who holds all the keys? But what about the guy that makes the keys, wouldn't he be the biggest prey?

On my private PC I use firefox on my work laptop I use chrome. The gmail and gdrive integration just makes it easier.

Still on my private I have to switch to chrome for a few things because it just has more storage

What do you mean by "[chrome] ... has more storage"?

They mean their personal PC has more storage than their work laptop. Why storage is important while browsing the internet is beyond my understanding.

I used Firefox at work because my company had the enterprise version of Chrome and had a lot of options I couldn't change. Like the behavior on startup. It would only open the homepage, not reopen tabs.

That's pretty much why enterprise doesn't prefer Firefox. Chrome integrates with windows group policy. Firefox ignores it for better or worse.

This is great! Thank you for sharing. Def pushing to get this approved now :)

I use Firefox. The only thing I don't like about it is that Duck duck go isn't a terribly accurate search engine compared to Google.

But you can just change your search engine

Actually in my country DuckDuckGo is the only reliable search engine left. Google started giving me a bunch of bogus results for very specific queries a couple of years ago. Sad that FF depends so much on Ma'Google.

Oh hmm I don't have that experience. If I Google an obituary for example, it automatically goes to the person correctly but I find DDG doesn't have that precision.

Number 2 for me. And it's noticeable. I'd love to use it, but I just can't ignore the performance difference.

  1. It's actually faster than Chromium in recent build benchmarks. Firefox runs JS faster.

I ran the speedometer 2.0 benchmark on firefox and cromite (fork of bromite), and Firefox beat chrome by like 20 points which surprised me because chrome still feels a bit faster. Maybe this is why

I'm not so obsessed with foss, just use what is most convenient and Firefox turned up not to be it

If it's only quality would be being foss, I would understand. But that's not case case. The main quality of firefox (I think) is that you have no chance for privacy whatsoever with other browsers. It's not just the current state of chrome, but from time to time google always does something to make chrome worse than before, and it's even expected because that is in their interest

I can relate to it, but practically privacy is the least my concern. Why should I be upset about a company abroad knowing my advertising data or history, it doesn't have any impact on my work

I can't say that I praise what they do. But when there is any practical advantage I cast aside privacy and go for it.

Because they'll use against you what they have found out.

Advertising networks want to get you to buy things you don't need, or at places where you probably wouldn't want (higher price, garbage warranty process).
They are also used for deception campaigns*, which is made more efficient by showing you those ads that may have a better chance to catch your attention.

* an example is false political propaganda, which was youtube spreading in unskippable ads in my small country, before and while elections were going. It was a great success to them. multiple local channels were trying to block these with minimal success (channels have tools to filter ads their guess see), as somehow blocking by category or by uploader channel did not work, only blocking every single such video, which is ineffective because new ads from those scumbags still get shown.

Insurance companies may also change your rates when they find out something about you from data brokers, which includes diseases you don't even know you have.
Media platforms (social media, video sites like youtube, movie sites heavily using recommendations) know your rough (or finer) worldview, your interest, what makes you click and such, and they'll first put you in an echo chamber where they form your opinions by showing you news and other media that you want to see (which is not necessarily true, and can also miss the bigger picture, but you'll most likely accept it with the least questioning), and then they also form what you see by their agendas: they know what gets your interest, they can use that to show content that makes you stay for longer, and they can also show content that spreads information that is in their interest and about which they know you'll still read it or at least think about it.

Data points get connected. Ads are served. For some people, that's enough of a privacy violation. The next step is selling your information to insurance companies.

What issues did you have if you don't mind me asking.

Entirely to my system, but for me startup of Firefox takes 40 seconds and up to a minute and the UI feels very slow and unresponsive. No other application behaves like that and I have no idea how to bugfix because Firefox seems not to create any usable logs or prints anything useful to the terminal it's started from.

Me too, but I have at least a dozen of firefox windows and hundreds of tabs combined, all of which are restored on starting it (because I want it this way, I could also just disable restoring them if I wanted).

Also don't forget that there are addons that make the browser waiting before continuing to start up, and with a good reason.
One such is uBlock Origin, which needs some time to load it's filters into memory, especially if you have enabled more than the defaults. If it wouldn't do that, it couldn't do filtering for the tabs that get loaded right at startup, and that would be quite bad.
On chrome, addons can't make the browser to wait with the first network requests (but also can't do efficient filtering anymore thanks to Manifest v3 changes, brought to you by your favorite advertising company), so chrome will inevitably be able to start up faster, but with a huge cost on your privacy, because uBO and such firewalls can't do their job properly.

Happens to me after fresh installation without any extensions or configuration.

Oh, that's weird. What is your configuration? (OS, hardware)

Kernel: Linux 6.4.10-arch1-1 x86_64
Firefox: 116.0.3
Openbox: 3.6.1
Nvidia: 535.98
Xorg: 21.1.8

CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz
GPU: NVIDIA Corporation GP104 [GeForce GTX 1080]

16 gigabytes of RAM, barely used when testing
4K display, but should not be relevant here

Well, I was thinking of the RAM and swapping.. firefox is regularly slow for me (along with a lot of other programs!) because dumb windows starts swapping out everything at 22-25 GB usage out of 32. Apparently there's no such thing here as swappiness. Blood boiling.

But I don't have an idea now, sorry

edge is faster, has the best ai tts, I miss containers but honestly I didn't use it that much

Shockingly, a lot of people have no clue how extension works, but Firefox will eventually sell out, they all do.

Shockingly. Most of humanity are stupid, media consuming dumbasses.

Firefox is ancient and used to be a major browser before chrome. They had plenty of opportunity to sell out and didnt. That said, firefox is shittier to use

1 more...

Sadly, on pc many ppl that are not tech savvy assimilate internet to google chrome, I had some cases where they asked me "I want to install internet" when they means I want to install chrome to browse internet. I remember when chrome became more known by 2009/2010 Firefox had some issues, it crashes frequently and it was a bit slower, so people who found chrome faster adopted it fastly and it was more and more recommended. In my case I'm using FF since 2006 and I never stopped.

Because Mozilla sucks as a company. They should be coming up with new ways to promote Firefox. Instead they are just getting paid by google and selling vpns

Firefox boot slower on Android. Webkit-based browsers boot much faster. I think they make use of some preloading of the browser itself.

I think a lot comes down to preinstalled SW on phones (Chrome/Safari) and the enterprise world. My rather large employer just switched from FF preinstalled to Edge for all work devices since it alreadz comes with Windows.

Maybe Firefox is missing a really compelling enterprise offering for Desktops? Everybody less savvy is on mobile anyways, which is dominated by the Duopoly Apple/Google.

I use Firefox, but it has been becoming a chore.

Specifically on Android, randomly it'll just not load a page or change tabs. It'll also randomly just lose the entire DOM and only render a black screen.

I still put up with it but I'm hoping they can focus on UX quirks a little more.

Hashtag late but Firefox’s main downsides is that it’s tab flushing sucks compared to Edge, and there’s no native vertical tabs.

In Edge, if a tab is put to sleep, clicking it again does not require a full refresh. Why does it need to completely reload in Firefox?

I’m aware there’s extensions for tab groups and vertical tabs (I’m using Simple Tab Groups), but it should be a natively supported feature.

Add that to the fact that Firefox is now the web developer equivalent of IE6 circa 2010 - minuscule user base and requires weird hacks to get websites to look good on it - and you got a recipe for people not wanting to use it.

Also lying about being the privacy focused browser when it has a bunch of telemetry and a bundled sponsored extension I had to look up how to get rid of, that part sucks too.

I have no doubt that the second that FF gains a sizeable market share they will just turn in to literally every other corporation that has ever existed. They're not special, they're not your friend. They are selling a product to make money. And while they're struggling, they are working their asses off to make a good product that beats the alternatives.

So until FF announced their intention to DC, I'm not telling a fucking soul.

Too many bad UX updates. I won’t go back to a browser without vertical tabs.

But you could never have vertical tabs without extensions before. And you still can now.

TreeStyleTabs only available on FF and that's persuaded me (together with the looming adblicker ban)

almost no one cares about what Firefox adds, the convenience and trust Google got pretty much got everyone i think

For me it's a silly issue, they don't let me customize my homepage and let set extensions like tabliss on homepage on android such a basic feature yet not available also external download manager implementation on android is horrible

UI is worse, performance is mostly a bit slower, the morals seem cloudy sometimes.
and.. the biggest one: PEOPLE ARE APATHETIC

I install chrome on a computer and log in, I'm immediately connected to my calendar, email, cloud storage, remote desktop, documents, and my login info is synced floor all the other things I do and will auto login for me on a large number of those sites. In short it saves me a crazy amount of time.

You can do pretty much the same thing with Firefox: you sign in to Firefox to sync your passwords and browser settings, then (assuming you're talking about Google calendar, Gmail, etc.) You can sign into your Google account with one click. That's not really any less convenient.

Besides, I've hardly ever heard of anyone moving away from Firefox to Chrome, so I doubt the reason is any sort of convenience or design superiority. I'd attribute it to the fact that most people who already use the Internet (pretty much everyone) has already settled on a browser, with chrome-based browsers being the most common. So anyone new to the Internet will just choose the favorite as the default. This is especially true considering they most new Internet users are probably kids, so they're not aware of concerns about privacy, monocultures, DRM, etc. that would drive someone to pick Firefox.

Basically, it's not that Chrome is actually better than Firefox. I think it's that the market is growing, and the most common browsers will grow more quickly than Firefox simply for the sake of familiarity.

Many would argue this is not a good thing. Plus, Google login permeates all Google services as a session and has nothing to do with the browser at that level.

Chrome is the only browser I actively avoid using on my PC or on mobile, simply due to Google tracking every website I visit

A lot of extensions now seem to be Chrome only (probably because Chrome has so much market share), and from what I looked into there isn't an easy way to use Chrome extensions in FF.

I saw something over the last week starting Firefox had implemented install chrome extensions. Think there are some caveats

https://m.slashdot.org/story/418304

"select extensions" I hate this patronizing shit so much. They kill off startpages, they make it impossible to install unsigned extensions. There has to be a better way to protect users from malware than acting like this is not my computer and the software on it isn't mine to do what I want with.

FYI, AFAIK this isnt so much about protonizing users than about a technologie switch on android and then having to re-add necessary functionality ... and doing that while the web-extension api ist still changing.

Think of the malware protection as more of a sideeffect of the general design choices in regards to the web-extension API.

Hope this info helps or is at least a little interesting.

If they're planning on expanding it ultimately then it's not so bad I guess

this isnt so much about protonizing users than about a technologie switch on android and then having to re-add necessary functionality

I'm going to disagree there. It's been possible to add more extensions in the unstable nightly builds since just after the change, but requires having a Mozilla account and jumping through some hoops. Iceraven, a third-party build removes some of the hoops, and indeed many extensions not specifically built with Android in mind work just fine.

I can't guess what Mozilla is actually thinking here, but it's not true that it isn't or wasn't technically feasible to allow installation of arbitrary extensions on Firefox for Android following the rewrite.

It’s been possible to add more extensions in the unstable nightly builds since just after the change

possible yes ... but as you might have notices many many more addons even those with a large userbase dont work or dont work properly because of the mentioned missing APIs or other issues. And i absolutely understand that mozilla did not want to expose this situation to "normal users" who would likely easily assume some failure/error on firefox part for not working with the extensions. So keeping this feature behind a "small" barrier (collection and nightly) until those issuse could be properly addressed seems to have been a wise decision, if you look at it like that.

mozilla did not want to expose this situation to “normal users”

That's patronizing.

A checkbox to enable full extensions support and a clickthrough warning on anything that didn't explicitly support the new version for Android would have been more than adequate.

patronizing

def. : showing or characterized by a superior attitude towards others

i dont see any indication for a "superior attitude" ... and i personally agree with you that it would have been nice to have easier access to the incomplete feature ... but looking at it from mozillas viewpoint i guess you could also argue that by not making it "to easy" ... they made sure that many people did not run into the frustrating situation of non-functional addons. i mean if it was as easy as toggeling a switch in settings or about:config ... many normal people would follow some tech article blog post and just flip the switch and forget even that they did. Requiring a bit more effort ... might actually be a smart decision.

I'm going to call an app developer saying "users are not sophisticated enough to make good decisions about add-ons even if we warn them about incompatibility" as showing a superior attitude toward users.

Ultimately, my objection to how they handled it isn't that some effort was required to install extensions. Instead, it's that:

  • It requires an account. There's no good reason for it to work that way, and it's antithetical to the goals of privacy and anonymity that Mozilla otherwise seems to support.
  • For years, there was no roadmap for broader extension support, leading developers to not waste effort on making extensions compatible.

I’m going to call an app developer saying “users are not sophisticated enough to make good decisions about add-ons even if we warn them about incompatibility” as showing a superior attitude toward users.

That does indeed not sound very diplomatic ... but i dont remember seeing that quote anywhere. Do you have a source?

It requires an account.

Well, if i remember correctly you only need an account if you want to install extensions on stable. If you use the nightly or beta builds, i think you dont. But please correct me if i am wrong here. I might be mixing this up.

For years, there was no roadmap for broader extension support,

well ... the thing with the roadmap ... is kind of a long standing issue with fiefox products .. from other dicussions i've seen and had i have gathered the opinion that mozilla has intentionally been getting very careful with posting any kind of roadmaps ... with anything besides very vague milestones ... and the only 2 reason i and other people seemed to are because they just wanted to be careful about making promises they might not be able to keep and prevent other from arguing about the roadmap decisions. And i know a lot of people in the community have very strong opinions and get easily angry ... so going with not having a roadmap also seems like a reasonable decisions to keep fallouts/fights from happening. - Mostly guessing here ... but its the best explaination i could come up with ... maybe i am completely wrong and the is actually another or actually no reason ... but i kind of doubt that.

i dont remember seeing that quote anywhere

It's not a quote. It's what their decisions say to me. I don't think we're likely to come to an agreement about whether their decisions were patronizing, and that's fine - it's a matter of opinion more than objective fact.

if i remember correctly you only need an account if you want to install extensions on stable

That's not correct. Stable doesn't allow it at all, and an account is required for nightly.

As for a roadmap, saying the intend to open up extension support soon isn't that big a promise since the support already exists and is just locked out by default.

I agree ... we both have differnet opinions and that is indeed fine.

Thank you for the interesting exchange and sharing your opinions.

Have an excellent day!

Because I think people are used to Chrome.

That being said, I used Edge till November 2022, before the Manifest V3 change.

Ever since the first release, I've tried Firefox a few times. Each time I was left with a feeling of needing dozens of extensions to get it up to par with the browser I was using at the time (mainly Opera and now Vivaldi). The extensions I found were never customisable enough, and would often break and/or be abandoned after a while.

Don't get me wrong: Chrome, IE, Edge, and Safari are worse - each time I used them I got the urge to throw my computer out the window after just a few minutes. But Firefox is just not customisable enough to my liking, and extension are IMO not the answer.

I'm curious, what is missing from Firefox compared to Vivaldi according to you?

Note that since I don't use Firefox some of these may actually be available, but I don't know about them.

  • Mouse gestures.
  • A status bar that stays on screen.
  • The ability to select part of a link's text.
  • Tab stacking.
  • Tab tiling.
  • Opening a link in either a foreground or background tab. This is available as a toggle in the settings only.
  • Ad block.
  • Spatial navigation.
  • Customisable keyboard shortcuts for pretty much everything.

These are the ones that matter to me, there are more that I don't personally use.

Mouse gestures, really? Lol

Ok "ad block" is straight trolling. Firefox is the browser that is actually conducive to blocking ads

Most of this list is puzzling

"dozens"?

How could that possibly be? It's a web browser. You know that right? It sounds like you're trying to turn it into some other type of application.

I use like 5 extensions for privacy reasons and 5 for preference reasons. This all makes my browsing experience VASTLY BETTER, not just tolerable or something. These are all adding features, some of which chrome specifically is idealistically against (the Internet without ads or as much tracking). If you took all these extensions away, Firefox would still be functionally just as good as chrome if not better.

So yeah it always blows my mind when people claim how lacking in features Firefox is. What are you even talking about?

Note that I explicitly said Chrome is worse. And "dozens" was likely an exaggeration. But yes, compared to Vivaldi, Firefox has very little customisation.

userChrome.css, userChrome.js

There is your customization. There are several skins and such this way.

Vivaldi is a very weird browser. Personally I think most people don't want the customizations it offers.

I actually switched away from Firefox to Vivaldi a few months ago mainly for 2 reasons.

  1. Firefox's profiles are dogshit. They are almost a hidden feature and are very cumbersome to use.

  2. The Android browser support for certain types of extensions is dodgy. Using uBlock Origin delays the loading of all webpages by a few seconds for some reason. There is a Github issue about this that has been open for a few years now.

I want the browser I use to be on both Android and desktop. Vivaldi has been OK so far.

I do miss a lot of the good stuff from Firefox, especially their address bar. For some reason I find it much better than anything on Chromium based browsers. Firefox's is much snappier and is correct with it's suggestions the majority of the time.

I also like Firefox's sync between devices to be much better.

When those 2 issues are resolved I will come back, but as it stands now it's a hassle for my needs.

@Index @Maddison

I agree that Firefox can be extremely close to load a page on Android, but I never thought that it could be uBlock doing that.

I keep bouncing back and forth between Firefox and Brave.

you can use profiles easily by creating shortcuts with the flag --profile xyz

The thing with Firefox is that it's not the best at performance, especially on phones where the browser can be laggy. I use Ungoogled Chromium instead which is Chrome without Google and some nice tweaks !

IDK, Firefox works pretty well on Android with an ad blocker.

Base on my experience, lower end phones (especially ones that does not have the latest android versions) struggles with Firefox.

They have these sorts of issues such as webpages refreshing when switching tabs or applications and etc.

As for me, I am in the same boat as you. No issues and pretty snappy imo.

Fair. Though hopefully that's outdated, because Firefox on Android got a lot faster for me about a year or so ago when they made the big extensions change.

For me, I it has always been laggy. Chromium is smoother

Firefox is far from the best for privacy. There are a ton of Firefox forks that add a ton of privacy. If you care about privacy, you use one of those. If you don't care about privacy you use Chrome or Chromium (functionally superior) so it's not too complicated.

Firefox on android is terrible. The UI is awful (how hard is to create a usable bookmark system?) and forced opening a new tab are my two pet peeves. Also, it is much, much slower than a chromium based browser in my experience and seems to take a lot more memory. Also, occasionally I'll find websites that don't work 100% because they were coded primarily for chromium based browsers. FU Google.

I quite like Firefox for Android, mainly because I can install UBlock Origin and block ads, which Chrome does not support.

The UI is awful (how hard is to create a usable bookmark system?)

agree to disagree, it's one of the best. What do you use that's better?

I don’t use anything else. I don’t like the long list of folders that doesn’t clearly show the tree hierarchy, ie. I can’t easily identify the child/parent relationship. The visual difference between parent and child is too minimal for my eyes. I realize it’s subjective but I really don’t like it.

Ah, agreed. There's like no indent at all in that list. Room for improvement

2 more...

Most people don’t know how to use extensions well and how to use Firefox well. (Most of my friends in their 30’s still live without ad blockers, so I don’t think many are educated here)

All browsers have extensions, even Safari. This has nothing to do with FF particularly

It’s just not as fast as Chrome or Brave. I can’t deny this, but despite of this, I find it’s worthy.

Firefox is now a memory hog as bad as Chrome, but doesn't offer speed and responsiveness, which is kind of a shitty trade-off

It’s not the default.

Neither is Chrome, yet people actively download and install it.

Many features which are Google specific aren’t supported.

True

Many websites are just not supporting firefox anymore (looking at you snapchat), but you would be right in saying this is the effect of Firefox losing it’s market share not the cause (at least for now) and you would be right.

True

All browsers have extensions, even Safari. This has nothing to do with FF particularly

Some people not using Firefox might use it if they understood some of the great extensions for FF which are unique to it. Like the Containers one.

people who don't use extensions due to lack of knowledge about them probably wouldn't care if they knew about them either

Not actually necessarily true. I just recently learned about the Firefox container extension which is a game changer I didn't know about

Again, I guarantee if someone never cared about extensions and didn't even install uBlock, then Containers is an abstract concept to them.

I am an example of this person you assert couldn't exist. That's what I'm pointing out. Not sure how that's not getting across.

you were unaware of extensions?

I knew about extensions but not a specific one that was a game changer for me.

My point was even though I knew about extensions, I didn't use Firefox on mobile until I found out about some extensions I didn't know existed on mobile, and on desktop, had I not been using FF before learning about containers, I may have switched at that moment when I found out

Exactly, you proved my point. You knew about extensions and enjoyed learning about Containers. most people aren't like you though: they don't care about extensions, they use their computer once a month, they don't bother installing uBlock and have no need for Containers.

Cuz frankly, they dum

They use whatevers already on their phone/computer. Most non-tech savvy people likely use iPhone.

Thank Mozilla for this. They're too busy with other shit and between feature removals and crappy UI changes, they've managed to loose a huge amount of users. I used to be one of them. Now I wouldn't touch FF with a 10 feet pole. I simply refuse to give Mozilla more visibility.

2 more...

Firefox lost it's shares to normies because it was bad. Then it lost shares of tinkers because it moved extension, user agent and so on to chromium. Small market shares means developers don't give a damn about testing on firefox. Firefox doesn't show correctly pages and has no good support for pwa, microsoft teams etc. Chromium invents new things wich only edge and chrome have/support. Normies use browser wich just work out of the box for work and pleasure. It's a circle. You can tinker with your niche browser but massed decides what is what. Chrome/Edge are just better for every day use. Simple as that.*

God, all of this is just incorrect.

You just live in your fantasy world. Go outside sometimes and see what people really use. They don't use firefox for a reason.

No, I live in a fantasy world because I use a far superior browser that also doesn't track me.

And so can everyone. Nothing to be mad or weird about.

Yeah yeah. Mr robot experiment, broken extensions, pocket, telemetry build in but not opt in, user data collecting. I don't even talk about pushing shitty propaganda on their browser and blog to lock internet freedom. Also incompetence of mozilla as organization. Big pay of to director then browser is in shittiest position ever. Mozilla director photo on instagram with middle finger up gor users who don't like her. Even more things just google them yourself. You just don't want to see them. You must be crazy standing for them for free. Maybe you're one of them. At least here you can't ban comment you don't like... kinda yet. Because reddit subreddit does that because they don't like truth.

Ok you're a wack job, makes sense now.

To say you're gargling the Google boot is an understatement

So no arguments? I don't even use chrome or edge...

And yet you still choke on the boot. No I don't have reason to argue with a conspiracy weirdo

Because you don't have arguments. Where do you see conspiracy? It's known facts on the internet found by others.

I suppose I never considered switching off of Chrome because I didn’t need my browser to do anything better for me. I’ve always been fine with Chrome’s speed, the UI is nice, and in general I don’t experience any issues with it.

Despite the memes, Firefox was the one which decided it wanted to deep throat 30gb of my ram by default for no discernable reason so I stopped using it. Only extentions I had installed were ad block and the reddit enchantment suite. Since then I've been really enjoying the video pop out of opera.

deep throat 30gb of my

Me no know what you mean

Since then I’ve been really enjoying the video pop out of opera.

another killer feature of FF I could not live without, FF has it too you know.

Some time ago Firefox started eating tons of RAM. I googled a bit and found it was actually AdBlock Plus eating RAM, so I switched to uBlock Origin. But not all people switched to another extension, some of them switched to anotger browser.

If you like Opera try Vivaldi, it's made by the same guy who did OG Opera and has a lot of the same features but the ad and tracker blocking is much better.

It's got video pop out (most do, but only V and Opera/GX had good controls for miniaturized video.)

  1. It doesn't have native integration for features some people find incredibly useful. For example, tab stacking and the eternally useful side bar of Opera/Vivaldi. These features are hand waived away by FF fans but to those that find them integral it's worth staying on a browser that doesn't require bloating it up with extensions just to replicate the baked in features of another offering.

  2. People are starting to realize that all the "Mozilla is the hero in the fight against chromium!" Bullshit is really just talking points since they're funded primarily by Google. Taking the bite out of any moral arguments to use it. Convincing the couple hundred thousand fediversians to switch would be consider a rounding error in the global user base of chrome, and the future of the web will continue to evolve as browser suppliers find ways of circumventing whatever crap Google cooks up. Nothing is ever "the end." As long as software exists something will be designed to crack it.

  3. You sound like an AI generated Firefox Ad.

You sound like an AI generated Firefox Ad.

beep bop boop! I am a bot

Mozilla is payed for setting Google as a default search engine. That doesn't contradict Firefox vs Chromium claim.