Ron DeSantis bans 'global elite' lab-grown meat

MicroWave@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 579 points –
Ron DeSantis bans 'global elite' lab-grown meat
bbc.com

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has banned lab-grown meat, saying he will "save our beef" from the "global elite" and its "authoritarian plans".

"Florida is fighting back against the global elite's plan to force the world to eat meat grown in a petri dish or bugs," Mr DeSantis said in a statement. 

The first-in-the-nation law prohibits anyone from selling or distributing lab-grown meat in Florida.

Similar efforts are under way in Alabama, Arizona and Tennessee. 

Lab-grown or "cultivated" meat was first cleared for consumption in the US in 2022.

The process of making cultivated meat involves extracting cells from an animal, which are then fed with nutrients such as proteins, sugars and fats. The end product is genetically indistinguishable from traditionally produced meat.

Studies have suggested that eating cultivated meat can cut carbon emissions and water usage, and free up land for nature, compared to eating traditionally produced meat.

247

Ah, the 'global elite,' who they also call 'globalists.' And who are they talking about?

The term is now frequently used as a pejorative by far-right movements and conspiracy theorists, as in the New World Order conspiracy theory;[3] it is associated with antisemitism, as antisemites frequently appropriate the term globalist to refer to Jews.[3][4][5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalism

Remember, that's just a wild conspiracy. Criticizing the Israeli government's genocide is antisemitic though...

The way you've phrased this sounds like you think there really is a Jewish cabal that runs the world and is ruining it.

I apologize if you thought I was implying that. I am in no way agreeing that there is a "Deep State" or anything to that effect. I was trying to draw criticism to DeSantis' use of the word Globalists, which does have antisemitic overtones, while the House just passed a bill that could lead to criticism of Israel in any way would count as antisemitism.

Sarcasm on the internet is hard to convey.

Gotcha. I understand now.

Thanks for clarifying, I didn't understand the comment either. (I did not downvote it, however.)

Sarcasm on the internet is hard to convey.

No, it's not.

/s

I think the term has no real meaning to them anymore. It’s just another term thrown at anything they don’t like, like “woke” or whatever. I’m sure some definitely use it deliberately, but I think most lack the directed prejudice and just use it lazily as a catch-all for “liberal”.

That's the whole point of obfuscating it in the first place. If you come out and say "Jews who control the world want to force everyone to eat bugs", you sound like an idiot. So, you give it a candy coating to make it go down better, and hope a certain percentage will eventually "do their own research" and come to your desired conclusion.

It's the most strategically sound method you can come up with to perpetuate the conspiracy theories in the modern day. It's similar to how cults don't start the recruitment process by walking up to you and going "Hey, want to join a cult?"

The late, legendarily brutal campaign consultant Lee Atwater explains how Republicans can win the vote of racists without sounding racist themselves:
You start out in 1954 by saying, “N*****, n*****, n*****.” By 1968 you can’t say “n*****”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “N*****, n*****.”

https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategy/

Whatever they are saying is just a standin for a slur. Look at the tweet about "Baltimore's DEI mayor" and too immediately see that they are just using CRT, woke, gender ideology, DEI, elite, or whatever new term comes into Vogue next month as a stand in for whatever applicable slur.

whatever new term comes into Vogue

These people are reading Vogue? That's an interesting twist. I wouldn't have thought the average Fascist would be all that into fashion. Fashists?

It's part of the "other," which is used to create fear that drives support for their politicians.

Right wing leaders and their propagandists can't be too specific with concepts because large parts of them are contrived. They don't need to be specific because their target audience is people who think and make decisions more with emotions, which doesn't require clear concepts and terms, than reason.

"The left" absolutely does it too, although it's not as bad.

They don't just turn terms into slurs to rally the morons, they do it to attack the ideological base of their opponents.

"Globalist" became a dogwhistle for Jewish people because fascists pretended to think socialism, which inherently rejects nationalism or loses all meaning, was a Jewish conspiracy. By turning it into a meaningless slur they're not just turning their base against the idea, they're making their opponents react to its use as slur.

As it happens, neoliberalism ended up having a different kind of globalist goal, so they got a free 2 for 1 slur against their ideological enemies even though the end goals are wildly different. And, obviously, fascists don't see the need to explain how the "Jewish conspiracy" is behind both socialism and neoliberalism.

It also just turns people against the concept without understanding what it actually is.

Thus me just last week having to argue with a "socialist" social democrat about how "globalism" isn't a dogwhistle on an ideological level.

Definitely some of them use it that way. It's clever in a thuggish way because the implication is that the base is just regular, normal folks.

Also the Harvard/Yale grad complaining about "elites". Tell me again who gets into those schools? The run-of-the-mill pablum?

It's nice to know he recognises the elite nature of globalism though.

The 'global elite' wouldn't touch lab grown meat. This stuff is meant to sustain the poor when cow meat production becomes cost prohibitive (it already is without government subsidies).

That's ridiculous. Every scientist I have ever seen involved in this field says it is about getting people to give up or at least eat less meat for the good of the planet.

Our points don't disagree. Point #1 The goal is food production in order to sustain a growing population. Current production is ecologically and economically unsustainable. Point #2 The "global elite" wouldn't be caught dead eating lab grown meat unless they are doing a promo for the "lab grown meat" company.

Personally, I imagine the global elite to be Cypher, enjoying a succulent steak while selling out the rest of humanity to robots.

I can't wait for lab grown meat to become widely available (in my state at least). I think it's really cool. Being able to eat real meat without harming animals sounds so futuristic. It's one piece of future technology that I can actually get behind.

Agreed. I think the environmental impact is much lower as well, which is basically a win/win if prices can compete with farmed animals.

It could, if we could stop giving factory farms subsidies and give them to lab-meat-makers instead.

I'm absolutely not sold on the lower ecological footprint, the same hubub was made about vertical farming and that was either highly expensive or came with a gigantic footprint.

But I sure hope it pans out.

Vertical farm viability scales almost inversely with electricity costs. And the latter trends lower and lower as time goes by. So I'm pretty confident that it's coming.

I used to build large scale hydroponic farms over a decade ago and they are super efficient at using resources

Yeah me too.

Even if you don't care about animals, synthetic will be cheaper, tastier, healthier, and better for the environment.

Honestly the only thing not to like about it is that you don't like the idea.

I dream of lab-grown bacon. Each piece an identical example of bacon perfection: just the right thickness and ratio of meat to fat.

A law mandating Floridians pay more for their food than any other U.S.citizen. Yeah, I'm sure that won't be overturned.

Not sure how that's relevant to my statement regarding lab-grown bacon, but if you don't think individual states pass laws that make their citizens pay more for things, you're not very familiar with the U.S.A.

The thing I never got about the plant based burger patties is they try to make it taste like a scrappy beef patty instead of making ot taste good in its own flavor. Like why can't it just be its own thing like how a chicken sandwich is different than a beef burger

The idea is that you can quickly and easily replicate a flavor you're used to and remove the animal element. You can also buy it and have a good idea what it will taste like.

But it's not healthy! Yeah no kidding, when I eat a burger it's generally not for the health benefits.

Are you referring to plant-based burgers? That would definitely apply to Beyond and Impossible as they add way too much coconut oil, and salt. In other words they're unhealthy for some of the same reasons animal flesh is unhealthy, although they are still less harmful than their animal counterparts just by lacking the animal proteins.

Pretty much. Although I don't know of anyone who doesn't add salt to a burger anyway, and the beyond/impossible burgers don't need any extra, so I don't think the sodium content is a super fair comparison.

As others already noted, you can get veggie burgers that taste like veggie burgers. I actually order black bean burgers with bacon and cheese and jalapenos at the cafe at my work, they are so good. Like it much better with black bean burger than hamburger.

I mean, you're basically describing a black bean burger. The real question is why we still can't buy like, pre-packaged black bean burger mix or ready made patties easily.

You can, at least in my local grocery stores. Black bean burger patties have been available in the frozen section for years.

They're a bit of a rip off because they're way more expensive than a can of beans + spices, and probably an order of magnitude more expensive than dry beans + spices, but they're usually around the same price as the premade beef patties, by weight.

Damn, guess I just live in an area where they're not as common then. They're definitely a rip-off, but then so are all pre-made patties. You pay a premium for the convenience.

If you live near Aldi's, they have a frozen black bean patty available sometimes. I can't tell the rhythm or reason to when they stock it, but they are reasonably priced and pretty tasty if ya see em

I don't think ive ever heard of a black bean burger I'll have to see if I can make some one day

Some of them are, and it doesn't take long (maybe a year) on a plant-based lifestyle to start naturally preferring more plant-forward burgers.

It depends how they make them. Some plant based burgers are just made with scraps from soy milk production, look like expired meat and taste like polystyrene or worse while the impossible burger it's difficult to distinguish with a blind test: the flavor, the texture and the appearance are extremely similar. They even have the fake blood in the middle

The only thing I really dont know about is the texture. If its ground down it will be indistinguishable. But are they able to make steaks that look and feel like actual steaks?

One thing people are afraid of though is being "duped". In a world where everyone is afraid of deception, they want all the products they consume to be clearly labeled. My partner thinks that they've been steadily replacing all meat with lab-grown and just not telling anyone and not labeling the packaging. Like, one day she stopped buying the chicken breasts she'd normally get, saying that "it doesn't taste right. It doesn't taste how it did pre-pandemic. They've done something to it."

I mean I have a Christian friend that thinks they have spoken with a spirit and won't microwave things because of "radiation." They're clearly insane just like your partner. The thing is I would never date them.

If my partner is insane, the pandemic did it to her. And how could it not, it killed her dad among several other people she loved.

Do his supporters really believe hes an “every man” like them, and not literally one of the “global elite”?

His supporters love hierarchy. All they want is white supremacist hierarchy. If they are in a middle tier and the bottom tiers are suffering that is their ideal society.

What? Its nothing to do with banning meat - its the message and reason as to why its being banned.

“Ban lab meat because the global elite!” vs “Ban lab meat to support farmers”.

It's the same line of reasoning with different excuses; I don't like it so no one should have it.

My comment was literally only calling out his “global elite” remark. Thats it.

Libs are fine with the same outcomes as long as you use the right words. It's wild.

You're telling me that motivation matters? Wild.

No that's the opposite of what I am saying. Material impact is what matters, I don't give a fuck what words are said.

This is bad policy.

"To fight authoritarianism, the government is going to restrict your dietary choices!"

  • Don Insantis

If you don't want it, don't buy it, problem solved!

bUt MuH fReEdOmS!?

The only thing that can stop a bad meat maker is a good meat maker?!

And it's not as if you'll be able to buy it next week anyway. It's an absolute non issue (should one be among the strange crowd that considers it an issue to begin with) that absolutely requires no urgent action or fanfare.

At the most, there ought be the normal overseeing of foodstuff. But then that's not what it's about of course.

I didn't realize the market was so fragile and needed conservatives to control it so closely. You learn something new every day!

Ya, you know, free-market and all that. Exactly what they have been borking up a tree about for decades now.

/s for those that need it.

For your convenience:

https://www.goodmeat.co/

The company who's product they are banning.

Along the same vein, there was another company recently who made plant based blue cheese that was disqualified from a blue cheese contest after they were going to take first.

https://boingboing.net/2024/04/29/after-a-vegan-blue-cheese-won-the-good-food-award-panicked-dairy-cheese-makers-forced-the-foundation-to-disqualify-it.html

The cheese is Climax Blue. Going to their site I'd honestly never have thought their cheese was good, it's basically a buzzword dumping ground. Doesn't sound like they have much product available currently but if it's really that good hopefully they can scale up quickly

The cheese was disqualified because it used an ingredient that hadn't been approved for human consumption.

Yeah, the ingredient is called Kokum butter, from the kokum fruit which seems like it has been consumed in various forms, mostly by people in India and south east Asia for a long time. (Including butter from the seeds) I hadn't heard of it before.

Do you have a source? This is the first I’ve heard that claim. Seems a legit reason to disqualify something from a “food” competition, but I’d like to verify before judging.

It's in the Boing Boing article linked in the comment I first responded to.

https://boingboing.net/2024/04/29/after-a-vegan-blue-cheese-won-the-good-food-award-panicked-dairy-cheese-makers-forced-the-foundation-to-disqualify-it.html

After initially being named a finalist, Climax Blue cheese was later disqualified by the Good Food Foundation, reportedly due to issues around one of the ingredients (kokum butter) not having GRAS certification.

Thank you!

I did some digging and found this follow up article about the whole ordeal:

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/sanfrancisco/news/vegan-fromager-cheesed-when-san-francisco-food-competition-revoke-award/

Takeaway: the rules got changed a week earlier, and the fake cheese company didn’t switch to their coco butter version of the blue cheese. (Coco butter is GRAS).

The rule change also shouldn't have been necessary. 'Food must be edible' isn't something that should have to be explicitely written down. Sure, it's probably safe, but 'probably' isn't really good enough for a food competition.

Eh. I get your sentiment, but there’s a pretty big difference between “edible” and having a certification from the FDA claiming “generally regarded as safe”

The better question is: why is kokum butter not GRAS? It’s sold everywhere. Has no one filed with the FDA?

I have never heard of kokum butter before, and certainly never seen it for sale, so 'sold everywhere' is a very regional thing. A quick search makes it look like it's mostly applied topically rather than eaten?

Yeah, that might be the case. I’ve never purchased any, so I’m no expert. Wonder why it was used in the fake cheese to begin with.

"Florida is fighting back against the global elite's plan to force the world to eat meat grown in a petri dish or bugs," Mr DeSantis said in a statement.

"Force the world" by... Having it as an option.

The party of small government and the free market everybody!

You are part of the elite you stupid stupid fuck

I want lab grown steaks so bad. Why are these 'Capitalist' so against the free market?

They always have been. Capitalism isn't about a free market, it's about keeping the richest most powerful industrialists at the top.

Imo this is clearly influenced by the meat lobby, National Cattleman's Beef Association, or the like. They know many people would happily pay for lab grown meat, which would destroy their current market, forcing a costly pivot where they would lose their historic market control.

Whenever weird shit like this happens in the US, it's all about money and market control and then painted as "protecting you from the EVIL LEFT" or some stupid shit.

So, if the 'global elite' are not the 1%, and as seen from this whole Gaza thing, they are not 'the jews' (which is what I though Republicans were always coyly referring to when they used that term), who the heck do the Republicans think the 'Global Elite' are?

Queer students, the vaccinated, and single moms who have to work 3 shitty jobs to pay rent. Those are the true global elite.

The real mental gumnastic exercise is understanding that they're somehow both elite and weak beta cuck trash (add whatever other derisions you'd like).

The enemy is both weak and strong.

Anyone who tries to benefit society without concern for profit.

Actually, anyone who tries to do anything without concern for profit.

If you're not familiar with the Farengi from Star Trek, look them up. It matches Republicans pretty well.

It's still the Jews, I think.

They just mean the ones that haven't gone back to Israel where they clearly belong, unlike the nice normal white proper Americans, who definitely didn't emigrate in from anywhere, and were here all along.

Florida seems to ban something every week.

Florida seems to ban something every week.

Brought to you by the "party defending your freedom"...

Maybe? I mean the big criticism is that it's just highly processed food at the end of the day and that the process of production is what is the issue. This is of course an argument made by what you may call food purists, who'd rather you spend money on a proper blender than rely on big corporations to form Scop 2.0.

But that's not what Ronnie boy is thinking about. Oh no. He's thinking about "owning the libs", "showing them what for", and what kind of cretinous, disingenuous bastard he can be. He would gladly invest in something like Scop 2.0 if it made a lot of money, AND performatively ban it in his state if it vaguely had an LGBTQ+ tinge to it.

This is a careful reminder that some states banned solar panels out of spite... because people elect absolute troglodytes to represent them, and then have the balls to talk about "free markets".

GTFO here with your fake self. In fact, take the whole republican party with you.

I mean the big criticism is that it's just highly processed food at the end of the day and that the process of production is what is the issue.

Not really? I honestly have not heard anyone argue like this against lab grown meat. The whole point of it is to have more ethical meat that also does not destroy our basis of life through emissions.

There's no ethical way to kill someone who's done nothing to you and doesn't want to die. There's no such thing as ethical meat.

Edit: I can't read apparently

I think that's the point of lab grown meat. If you can harvest the stem cells of a living animal and use those to grow full sides of beef (I'm vastly oversimplifying the process), then no animals have been killed.

Bonus, emissions may be lower depending when comparing typical animal emissions vs the facility that produces the LGM.

I apologize, it's early. The term ethical meat just annoys me, and I didn't thoroughly read what I was responding to. While I question the ethics around obtaining the stem cells in practice, I do agree lab grown meat is radically better than taking the flesh from animals.

It's not enough to be cast aside for veganism now I can't even have a choice of what to eat? WTF!

Something about "global elite" just sounds antisemitic to me... is this the new new "international Jewry?"

Could be I just have a hair trigger response these days, though

Yeah - it’s an Alex Jones thing. “International bankers” or the “global elite” are conniving with George Soros and Bill Gates to make you live in a “fifteen minute city” and eat da bugs.

and eat da bugs.

I'M DOING MY PART!

Would you like to know more?

Korean bar near me has a dish with silkworm pupae and I am certainly curious. Mealworms and crickets haven’t been bad, but I usually only eat them to psych out Boy Scouts.

I'm imagining you going around grossing out actual children Boy Scouts by eating progressively weirder things in front of them

Also showing off my pet vinegaroon, Tortilla (RIP), who’d make the whole room smell like vinegar and looked like a monster. Dare them to pet the hissing cockroaches and tell them about the professor at my university who let a tick feed off of her for weeks to prove that species was able to parasitize humans.

Most of my working life has been spent grossing out children, it’s pretty great.

I first read "International Jerry," and wondered for a second what Seinfeld had done this time.

For someone's who's a big capitalist, it seems like he's never heard of a free market economy. Just let the market decide which meat is best. Or better yet, let the people!

This is not an endorsement of our late-stage capitalist economy, rather a critic of Ronny's hypocrisy.

At this point, this guy is a just a troll. This loser needs to go.

Floridian boomers, xenophobes and christofascists keep putting him back in

It's really crazy. It's hard to imagine how shitty of a human you have to be to vote for that.

Who else than a large corp with sufficient funding can develop and market lab-grown meat anyway? Of course this kind of stuff will come from a large corp at first. Is he willing to launch a state-owned lab to fund it publicly? Yeah, I didn't think so.

It's not like people will jump at the opportunity to buy some backyard-shed-grown meat today, as appetizing that might sound.

I only eat bespoke lab-grown meat.

I'm holding out for free-range lab-grown meat. /s

I'm actually excited to try it if ever given the opportunity. Have been incorporating meat alternatives over the last 2 years and have cut out about 70% of my former beef consumption. Which, for me, is a lot.

All I care about are two things: Does it taste good and is it okay to eat? If it fulfills those two requirements, I have no problem with it.

There is a third, cost, which plays a very important part as well

If it's too expensive, I won't eat it. But I also wouldn't want it banned.

Petri dish free so you know the cells were free range as well.

Really tackling the major problems first there. As we all know I've grown meat is everywhere.

In this upside down world, the Jews standing together with oppressed people protesting apartheid and genocide are called antisemites by the same people who use every antisemitic trope in the books.

Ron is one of those people who knows how bad he is, but it's up to the useful of idiots of Florida to figure it out for themselves.

Not everyone in Florida is a moron, far from it. But enough of them are bad enough that it's scary watching them throw their lives away because they let ideas they don't even like live rent free in their heads.

I live in Florida in the number of non-idiots is really just a rounding error.

As someone who has lived in Florida his whole life. Florida and everyone in it could be wiped off the map and nothing of value would be lost.

He's a staunch free market Republican. Dude is seriously just throwing out dog whistle BS to conspiracy theorists. What is wrong with eating bugs? Does the little pansy give them icky?

It's not even bugs lmao, it's regular meat

You thankfully have not been exposed to enough conspiracy theorists. Many of them think the government is going to ban meat and force everyone to eat bugs instead because they are a more sustainable source of protein. It's a fucking weird conspiracy that makes no sense because would the government force you to eat bugs instead of just forcing people to become vegetarians?

Anyway, this was a clear call out to those whackos. Don't be surprised if you also see him push legislation against public transit and mention 15 minute prisons (aka walkable cities).

Nah, I listen to Knowledge Fight which debunks Jones who rants about what you said. This meat is specifically lab grown, not alternative meats, so either DeSantis is a total moron to mix em up, or he's doing this sorta on what you're saying but more on the prop up beef markets side than scared of insects side. It's like dairy companies attacking any non dairy milk, like oatmilk, almondmilk, etc. This one feels less the conspiracy pipeline and more lobbying money.

Though obviously conspiracy speaking points.

“They’re gonna take your burgers away!” Is the new rallying cry of the weird Right.

https://www.floridabeef.org/raising-beef/cattle-in-florida

Nearly one-half of all Florida Agricultural land is involved in cattle production.

Someone's probably worried about competition.

The question is, how much money is involved this that Ron is worried. Does he have a stake in it?

I mean, politicians don't generally need to personally be involved in an industry for special interests to have an influence on policy.

I wonder if there's room for a Dormant Commerce Clause case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dormant_Commerce_Clause

The Dormant Commerce Clause, or Negative Commerce Clause, in American constitutional law, is a legal doctrine that courts in the United States have inferred from the Commerce Clause in Article I of the US Constitution.[1] The primary focus of the doctrine is barring state protectionism. The Dormant Commerce Clause is used to prohibit state legislation that discriminates against, or unduly burdens, interstate or international commerce. Courts first determine whether a state regulation discriminates on its face against interstate commerce or whether it has the purpose or effect of discriminating against interstate commerce. If the statute is discriminatory, the state has the burden to justify both the local benefits flowing from the statute and to show the state has no other means of advancing the legitimate local purpose.


Thus, in a dormant Commerce Clause case, a court is initially concerned with whether the law facially discriminates against out-of-state actors or has the effect of favoring in-state economic interests over out-of-state interests. Discriminatory laws motivated by "simple economic protectionism" are subject to a "virtually per se rule of invalidity",[11] which can only be overcome by a showing that the State has no other means to advance a legitimate local purpose.[12]

On the other hand, when a law is "directed to legitimate local concerns, with effects upon interstate commerce that are only incidental", that is, where other legislative objectives are credibly advanced and there is no patent discrimination against interstate trade, the Court has adopted a much more flexible approach, the general contours of which were outlined in Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.[13] If the law is not outright or intentionally discriminatory or protectionist, but still has some impact on interstate commerce, the court will evaluate the law using a balancing test. The Court determines whether the interstate burden imposed by a law outweighs the local benefits. If such is the case, the law is usually deemed unconstitutional.[14] In Pike, the Court explained that a state regulation having only "incidental" effects on interstate commerce "will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits".[15] When weighing burdens against benefits, a court should consider both "the nature of the local interest involved, and ... whether it could be promoted as well with a lesser impact on interstate activities".[citation needed] Thus regulation designed to implement public health and safety, or serve other legitimate state interests, but impact interstate commerce as an incident to that purpose, are subject to a test akin to the rational basis test, a minimum level of scrutiny.[16] In USA Recycling, Inc. v. Town of Babylon, 66 F.3d 1272, 1281 (C.A.2 (N.Y.), 1995), the court explained:

If the state activity constitutes "regulation" of interstate commerce, then the court must proceed to a second inquiry: whether the activity regulates evenhandedly with only "incidental" effects on interstate commerce, or discriminates against interstate commerce. As we use the term here, "discrimination" simply means differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests that benefits the former and burdens the latter. The party challenging the validity of a state statute or municipal ordinance bears the burden of showing that it discriminates against, or places some burden on, interstate commerce. Hughes v. Oklahoma, 441 U.S. 322, 336, 99 S.Ct. 1727, 1736, 60 L.Ed.2d 250 (1979). If discrimination is established, the burden shifts to the state or local government to show that the local benefits of the statute outweigh its discriminatory effects, and that the state or municipality lacked a nondiscriminatory alternative that could have adequately protected the relevant local interests. If the challenging party cannot show that the statute is discriminatory, then it must demonstrate that the statute places a burden on interstate commerce that "is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits."[17]

Thank you for this. I was not aware. I would love to see a challenge like this, but I won’t hold my breath.

Someone’s probably worried about competition.

And when I pointed out that about the Tik Tok ban I was told that it was because the government really cares about us.

I AM THE GLOBAL ELITE.
KNEEL BEFORE MY VEGAN MIGHT!
ALL SHALL LOVE ME AND DESPAIR.

Lab grown meat is not vegan. It is “real” meat grown from animal cells. But yes, the joke is still funny.

No true vegan? After a certain point that seems a bit like arguing that corn isn't vegan because it was fertilized with cow droppings, but...

It depends on the type of vegan. If they are vegan because they don’t like hurting animals, then lab grown meat is fine. If they are vegan because eating meat has a negative effect on their health, then it’s not fine.

You offer it to me freely??

...well, no, it's actually much more expensive than subsidised beef, but that's not important right now: KNEEL!..

the “global elite” and its “authoritarian plans”.

Real "Spiderman pointing at Spiderman" energy here.

The thing I love about the lab grown beef thing is that steaks will be really cheap when it scales I guess Desantis wants to use expense taxpayer dollars when he eats a steak That is the kinda fiscal responsibility you can expect from the right

Conservative are just so fucking stupid that it hurts my brains every god damn day having to deal with their fragile mental bullshit.

Every person still buying and consuming animal products paid for this.

These are Alex Jones' exact talking points. He is literally just regurgitating rhetoric.

I had an impossible Whopper for dinner, apparently I'm a global Elite!

That doesn't make you a global elite, it makes you obedient to the global elite. Well according to this FL nutbag.

Ok you guys, this is too silly. I’m not buying it any more. You can let me out of the simulation now.

What an idiot. So now I can't buy impossible burgers?

To my understanding, Impossible burgers are plant based / vegan. They aren’t lab grown meats of indistinguishably beef DNA.

Correct, those burgers are made from soy and potato protein. No meat in any form inside.

Thats good to know. Still, our govenor is an idiot

Because THAT is what I care about as a Floridian. Sure, Ron.

Make sure to eliminate all the non-threats first.

Even if this was an issue that you cared about, It is currently not happening.

Idiocracy gave us too much credit

Seriously, the movie took 500 years for them to reach that point. We'll be there in less than 100.

Quoted as saying "What would life be if we weren't a cruel as possible".

If it weren't for the giant beef producing industry in Florida, this might seem only performative..

Subtly serve Ron a dish including lab grown meat for dinner one day, see if he notices the difference

He doesn't care, personally. However, he's playing the 50% idiots that have been conditioned to put such non-problems ahead of every actual problem and corral themselves up in a circle of perceived persecution every time a keyword like "global elite" is dropped. He plays them because that's what they are useful for.

Here’s an interesting podcast on the topic of lab meat that shows just how much grandstanding this “fight” really is. https://open.spotify.com/episode/4yCKSioorfxTL6x7PaunOR?si=fCHOyvmgSXqITX9x7_6GxA

TLDR: they’re banning a product that isn’t even commercially available to the public yet.

they’re banning a product that isn’t even commercially available to the public yet.

To discourage investment and protect the people who bribe them lobbyists.

It wouldn't be a Republican ban if it wasn't tackling a fictional "issue".

What, is he claiming to be one of the global poors?

When a Republican says "elite" what they mean is "educated", not "wealthy".

Florida needs all of the protectionism it can muster - Florida beef is just lousy. It turns out that just because you can raise cattle somewhere spent mean you should.

Totally not compensating for something energy.

This guy? Compensating?

Heels? But that’s for women. What are you, some kind of lady boy? Did meat substitutes do it to you?

/s if I must

Cowboy boots with heels are definitely for men (helps keep your boot in the stirrup), but he's no cowboy.

The best way to combat this is to import large amounts of lab grown meat in sufficient quantities to drive down the price to force the factory farms to either switch over to lab grown or go out of business.

The imported meat would also need to be packaged the same as traditionally grown meat.

Packaging it the same would violate labeling and food regulations.

The way to combat this is for Floridians to pull their collective heads out of their asses and start voting for pro-democracy, pro-human, anti-fascists candidates. But I won't hold my breath, they don't seem like the brightest bunch down there.

The animal ag industry is so heavily subsidised that I'm not sure this could work.

With that stupid fucking "they want to make us eat bugs" bullshit...

Lemmy: Tik Tok should be banned. Your freedom means nothing!

Also lemmy: woah there, what happened to consumer choice in Florida?

Pretty much all of the comments I've seen on Lemmy about a TikTok ban have been about how it's political theater and would ultimately be pointless in preventing data harvesting.

Pretty much all the comments I've seen here were people praising it

Pretty much all the comments I've seen here were people praising it

I don't know how to explain this to you, but Lemmy users are made up of different people.

It's entirely possible you've encountered a bunch of people praising the TikTok ban. That doesn't mean any of those people are in this thread.

This take is as absurd as seeing some Pro-Palestine protesters and saying "oh, so now everyone's Pro-Palestine? I was just across the street at the counter protest and everyone was Pro-Israel!"

Condemn the US Congressional decision and admit it was made due to lobbying by Alphabet and Meta.

Okay: the TikTok ban was fucking dumb. Satisfied? That has nothing to do with this post.