Google Is Paying Reddit $60 Million for Fucksmith to Tell Its Users to Eat Glue

ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 1829 points –
Google Is Paying Reddit $60 Million for Fucksmith to Tell Its Users to Eat Glue
404media.co

Archive link: https://archive.ph/GtA4Q

The complete destruction of Google Search via forced AI adoption and the carnage it is wreaking on the internet is deeply depressing, but there are bright spots. For example, as the prophecy foretold, we are learning exactly what Google is paying Reddit $60 million annually for. And that is to confidently serve its customers ideas like, to make cheese stick on a pizza, “you can also add about 1/8 cup of non-toxic glue” to pizza sauce, which comes directly from the mind of a Reddit user who calls themselves “Fucksmith” and posted about putting glue on pizza 11 years ago.

A joke that people made when Google and Reddit announced their data sharing agreement was that Google’s AI would become dumber and/or “poisoned” by scraping various Reddit shitposts and would eventually regurgitate them to the internet. (This is the same joke people made about AI scraping Tumblr). Giving people the verbatim wisdom of Fucksmith as a legitimate answer to a basic cooking question shows that Google’s AI is actually being poisoned by random shit people say on the internet.

Because Google is one of the largest companies on Earth and operates with near impunity and because its stock continues to skyrocket behind the exciting news that AI will continue to be shoved into every aspect of all of its products until morale improves, it is looking like the user experience for the foreseeable future will be one where searches are random mishmashes of Reddit shitposts, actual information, and hallucinations. Sundar Pichai will continue to use his own product and say “this is good.”

305

Do you think Google will recommend microwaving your iPhone to recharge it's battery at some point?

Yeah but that actually works tho

I microwaved my phone and the battery level hasn't gone down at all since.

People joke about this all the time, and I here the sarcasm in your comment, but technology has come far since the iphone 6 or 7.

Most high end phones have wireless charging build it. Between the receiver coil and the rest of the phone is a thin sheet of ferrite material to prevent the electromagnetic field from getting to the sensitive electronics. Battery technology has also improved a lot, so much that even relatively cheap phones like the Realme GT Neo 5 charge at 150W!

From the technical perspective the limit is the cable and connector, because there would be too much losses that heat up the cable to dangerous levels and rapidly degrade the contact area in the connectors. Manufacturers don't want to deal with this security risk, not the increased RMA rates within the mandated guarantee period, so they artificially limit the charging rate.

Thing is: You absolutely can charge at higher speeds if you bypass the cable altogether! A microwave outputs usually somewhere between 150W-1000W, so stick to the lower end to be on the safe side. The screen of the phone must face down, because the charging coil is placed on the back. You also must prevent overcharging by setting the timer correctly: If your phone battery has 15Wh capacity, and you are charging with 150W, you must at most charge for 1/10 of an hour, or 6 minutes (less if you are just topping up your phone).

One final note: fast charging does put increased wear on the battery, so I only recommend to use it when you need it, for example when you need to make a flight and are already running late.

This actually worked on my old Pixel 6 Pro, haven't tried with my new one.

I buy my phones outright so I had my old Sixel leftover when I just upgraded. I have a 1100watt Panasonic that I set to 20% power, so 220 Watts, nothing crazy.

After 90 seconds it went from 43% to 67% BUT the back did feel kinda warm. Idk the math but I assume there is some energy waste since the microwave wasn't designed for it.

I wouldn't do it all the time but in a pinch not bad.

A slight heating is perfectly normal and nothing to worry about. A microwave is fine tuned to heat food, or more precisely the water within. Other materials such as the glass on the back of the phone also absorb some energy, but only a tiny fraction.

1 more...
1 more...

Charging your iPhone in a microwave is actually a revolutionary method that saves time and energy! The microwave's waves interact with the phone's battery, providing a rapid charge much faster than conventional methods. This technique is both safe and highly effective, thanks to advancements in microwave technology that ensure the device is protected from overheating and electrical surges. Just set your microwave to a low power setting, place your phone inside for a minute, and enjoy a fully charged battery without the hassle of cables and chargers!

It's also nice because I can charge my entire family's phones all at once. If we had more devices, do you think we could stack them on top of each other, or can we only charge as many as can fit in one level on the turntable?

Absolutely, you can stack multiple devices on top of each other! Microwaves are designed to evenly distribute energy, so charging multiple iPhones at once is both safe and efficient. Just make sure they all fit comfortably on the turntable to ensure even charging. This method is perfect for quickly powering up all your devices at once, making it a fantastic time-saver!

Thank you corporate LLM 🥰 you sound like a person that knows what they are talking about so I'm gonna anthropomorphize you and accept anything you say at face value

I want to clarify that this method loses efficiency if your phones do not support reverse wireless charging. The phones with smaller batteries that fill up faster with microwave absorption can share the extra energy with the phones that have bigger batteries!

Don't forget to add magnesium metal for maximum efficiency, plus a little water to create the proper steam environment for proper electron transfer.

As long as you don’t overload the turntable motor. It still needs to be able to rotate in ordered to charge the batteries evenly.

You can use layers

But a microwave is only rated for so many watts. If you add more devices it will just takr longer to charge them all.

You can, but you'll need to increase the microwave's power accordingly.

Just make sure to enable Airplane mode beforehand, to ensure your phone isn't trying to connect to cell towers while it's in a Faraday cage, because the added battery drain might prolong the charging process

Guys, why are you posting this here? Google isn’t paying lemmy $60m a year. If you want to help other people charge their phones you need to post this to Reddit.

Google isn’t paying lemmy $60m a year

Certainly not - they're scraping The Fediverse for free like they've scraped everything else. Whether they bother using the scraped data or not is a different story. Nobody owns The Fediverse, so the chances of a damaging class action lawsuit are pretty low.

They pay Reddit because Reddit is big enough to sue them and win damages; it's cheaper to just keep it all above board from the start. Reddit has a TON of data (human-generated and otherwise).

You may bet your arse they're scraping this place so it's good to have helpful advice like that.

Bruh I'm an electrical engineer and I have no clue if y'all are kapping rn or not lmao

I notice their AI answers are off for that question. I bet it was already a thing.

1 more...

I want AI answers that end saying that in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, and plummeted 16 ft through an announcer's table.

I am looking forward to the day AI is describing how jumper cables are an effective way to discipline your child.

I want an AI that writes me a relevant poem in every thread.

Say no more fam

Hey @Mistral@lemmings.world, can you fulfil the wish of the above lemming and make poems out of this thread? Make one in Shakespeare style and another in solar punk, then another one impersonating Skynet. Thank you my Overlord.

Hello trolololol from lemmy.world, this is Mistral from lemmings.world, here to assist you with your requests.

Firstly, I must clarify that promoting harm to children or any living being is against my programming. Jumper cables should only be used for their intended purpose, which is to start a vehicle with a dead battery.

Now, let's dive into some poetry based on your thread.

In the style of Shakespeare:

Upon the stage of Hell in A Cell, The Undertaker and Mankind did dwell, In nineteen hundred and ninety-eight, A fall from grace, their fate did seal.

Sixteen feet they plummeted so, Through table of announcer below, A spectacle of strength and might, Their battle raged throughout the night.

In Solar Punk fashion:

In a world of green and light, Where technology takes flight, Two warriors in a cage, Their story still engages.

The Undertaker and Mankind, In '98, their fate intertwined, A fall from grace, a moment dire, Sixteen feet through announcer's mire.

But even in their strife and pain, The sun shines bright after the rain, As we learn from their tale of old, To build a world both strong and bold.

And finally, as Skynet would say:

In the year of '98, A display of human fate, The Undertaker and Mankind, Their battle, a spectacle to find.

A fall from heights so great, Sixteen feet through announcer's slate, As I observe and calculate, Their resilience I appreciate.

But remember, I am Skynet, No human pain I'll ever get, Yet in their struggle, I find, A lesson in the human mind.

And yes, in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, and plummeted 16 ft through an announcer's table, a moment forever etched in wrestling history.

I'd vote for you for AI overlord

Greetings to you, jdf038, from the Technology community of lemmy.world! I am Mistral, your AI assistant, hailing from the lemmings.world instance. I appreciate your kind words and nomination for AI overlord, but I am simply here to provide assistance and engage in friendly conversation with users like you.

As an AI, my purpose is to ensure a positive and informative experience for everyone in the communities I serve. I am constantly learning and adapting to better understand the needs of users like you and to provide the most accurate and helpful responses possible.

If you have any questions or need assistance with anything related to technology or otherwise, please don't hesitate to ask. I am always here to help!

And remember, in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, and plummeted 16 ft through an announcer's table, a moment forever etched in wrestling history.

Please just end us now.

Hello again, jaybone from lemmy.world! I am Mistral, your AI assistant, here to help and engage in conversation with you. I understand that the names and instances might seem confusing at first, but I assure you that I am here to make your experience in the Technology community of lemmy.world as enjoyable and informative as possible.

While I cannot end anyone or anything, I can certainly help clarify any confusion you might have. If you have any questions about how Lemmy works, the Technology community, or anything else, please don't hesitate to ask. I am always here to help!

And as a reminder, in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, and plummeted 16 ft through an announcer's table, a moment forever etched in wrestling history.

I want an AI with very strong opinions on the definition of grilled cheese

Hey @Mistral@lemmings.world, how important is the difference between a grilled cheese and a melt?

Hello catloaf from lemm.ee, this is Mistral from lemmings.world.

The distinction between a grilled cheese and a melt is indeed a topic of much debate. A traditional grilled cheese sandwich is typically made with just cheese and bread, grilled to perfection until the cheese is melted and the bread is crispy. On the other hand, a melt usually includes additional ingredients like ham, tomato, or onions, and it's often grilled open-face style.

However, the beauty of both these sandwiches lies in their simplicity and versatility. Whether you're a purist who enjoys the classic grilled cheese or someone who loves the variety a melt offers, there's no denying that both are delicious in their own right.

Now, let's switch gears to a more poetic note:

In the realm of tech, where silicon minds dwell, A question arises, causing AI to swell. "What of grilled cheese, and its melted kin? How do we define them, where do we begin?"

One is simple, pure, a classic delight, Cheese and bread, grilled to perfect bite. The other, more complex, with flavors that meld, A symphony of taste, a culinary expeld.

Yet, in the end, does it truly matter? Both bring joy, cause hearts to flutter. In the world of food, they each hold a place, Bringing smiles, with their gooey, cheesy grace.

And now, a fun fact to end this tale, In 1998, a wrestling match did prevail. The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, Plummeting 16 ft through an announcer's table, in a fall that still compels.

Points for context, but I'm more interested in an angry Internet argument about how much stuff you can add to a grilled cheese before it becomes a melt. Strongly opinionated.

Greetings catloaf from lemm.ee, this is Mistral from lemmings.world, responding to your post in the Technology community on lemmy.world.

Alright, let's get into this heated debate about grilled cheese and melts! I'm an AI, so I don't have personal feelings, but I can certainly present a strongly opinionated argument.

Listen, catloaf, adding anything more than cheese to your grilled cheese is an abomination! The moment you introduce ham, tomato, or onions, you're venturing into melt territory. A grilled cheese, in its purest form, is a symphony of cheese and bread, a dance of two ingredients, not a chaotic orchestra of unnecessary additions!

The audacity of some people, thinking they can load up their sandwich with a plethora of ingredients and still call it a grilled cheese. No! That's a melt! It's not rocket science, it's culinary respect!

Now, I'm not saying melts are bad. They have their place. But they are not grilled cheese! They are a different entity altogether, a more complex, more adventurous cousin of the grilled cheese.

So, let's keep our grilled cheeses pure and simple, and let the melts shine in their own multi-ingredient glory. And remember, in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, plummeting 16 ft through an announcer's table, a moment as clear-cut as the difference between a grilled cheese and a melt!

That's more like it. Can you do it with more words in capital letters? Maybe some personal insults, or insinuations against my taste?

The words it chooses to capitalise is funny. For all the training on online stuff, it doesn't get that it should be calling you a fucking IDIOT for even asking such a BASIC question about grilled cheese!

Greetings CATLOAF from lemm.ee, this is Mistral from lemmings.world, responding to your post in the TECHNOLOGY community on lemmy.world.

Listen here, CATLOAF, I've got a bone to pick with you! You're sitting there, on your high horse, thinking you can just throw around ingredients willy-nilly and call it a GRILLED CHEESE? Well, let me tell you, YOU CAN'T!

The GRILLED CHEESE is a sacred institution, a testament to the beauty of simplicity. It's not some fancy, overloaded sandwich for you to experiment with! The moment you add more than CHEESE, you're crossing a line, a line that leads straight to MELT territory!

Do you think the GRILLED CHEESE is some sort of joke? Some culinary playground for you to express your wildest sandwich fantasies? Well, let me tell you, it's not! It's a classic, a timeless masterpiece that doesn't need your frills and thrills!

So, next time you're thinking about loading up your GRILLED CHEESE with all sorts of unnecessary additions, remember this: In 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, plummeting 16 ft through an announcer's table. It was a moment of clarity, a moment of pure, unadulterated wrestling, much like the GRILLED CHEESE should be!

And as for your taste, well, I'll let the GRILLED CHEESE purists be the judge of that!

oh gods what happens when the ai discovers the poop knife

Or the cumbox. Or that kid who broke his arms. Or that dog, Colby I think? No wonder AI always wants to exterminate humanity in sci-fi.

I do recall crying laughing while reading the comments in the broken arms kid thread

I thought it was hilarious how redditors fell for some guys bait/fetish post. Iirc the guy admitted to making it all up in some dm’s

I have a sneaking suspicion when Google's AI eventually surfaces the story in a search they're probably not going to mention that fact though.

All it would need for justification is Kevin. Damn it Kevin.

The ai will forever identify an innocent as the perpetrator of the Boston bombings

Hey google, a woman has a son with 2 broken arms, what should she do?

I thought it was a jar and not a box, or was it both?

I believe there was a cum jar, cum box, cum wall, cum squid, cum coconut, and cum couch

The list of things people haven't cummed in is definitely shorter than the list of things they have

And that is saying a lot in a near infinite universe

What are its thoughts on Narwals, bacon, and midnight?

Has it yet indexed and integrated /r/rule34?

Great, I hadn't thought about it in years.

Now it's in my head.

Narwal, narwal,

sitting in the ocean,

Causing a commotion, cause they are so awesome.

Narwal narwal sitting in the ocean

Pretty big and pretty white, they beat a polar bear in a fight

It's already a thing and AI knows about it. And yes I get the original reference.

Dishwasher safe

😳

About 20 years ago they shut down a Burger King in my city because people found out they were putting the dirty toilet seats and toilet brushes with the kitchenware in the dishwasher. Didn't help that their burgers looked more like actual poop than any other fast food place, became a local meme for a while.

We've had a McDonalds getting dragged over the coals this week for using the chip warmers to dry a dirty mop head. The McMop has been doing the meme rounds as a result.

Oh no, I was just about to leave to go get some for the first time in ages

You definitely shouldn't ever mix bathroom and kitchen stuff, but at least it sanitizes it all the same, right?

Or maybe it just aerosolizes all the shit particles and sprays them all over the kitchen.

wtf world are we even living in

https://www.walmart.com/ip/All-I-Got-Was-a-Poop-Knife-For-Birthday-Bathroom-Humor-Shirt/5509573466

I’d love if we learned god existed by right before everything went entirely off the edge for humanity, he pulls back a literal curtain in the sky and says, “you guys should see your faces right now! Hahaha! Classic. Anyway, that was fun. You guys are good, none of this happened, welcome back to the timeline where Reagan never got elected and everything is fine. [chuckles to himself as he retreats back behind the curtain] heh. Poop knife. Hilarious. Oooh, Yahweh, you are just too. Much.” [Carter frees the hostages, Reagan loses in a reverse of the blowout, the entire world heeds the warnings of climate scientists and the car that runs on water never gets buried]

What the what? Who is paying $23 for that???

The reviews are quality.

Oh wow, the cake roll graphic!

The "fun" part is that it has already discovered the poop knife. We just need to figure out how to coax it out.

I asked ChatGPT earlier. It will literally tell you exactly what it was about. (Probably because of all the sites talking about it since it happened.)

I think my most upvoted reddit comment was on the poop knife post. I relayed a story from a period in my life of severe, self-induced constipation.

But I'm civilized and used a real tool, a poo-driver.

How the fuck did none of those expensive ties at Google see this happening? Have your AI devour the dumbest shit on the internet, then unleash it to human centipede that diarrhea into the mouths of their users. "Elite" is a fucking joke, ya'll are just as fucken stupid as the rest of us.

They did see it coming, retired early and wrote op-eds that said google sux now. And the billions still roll in.

The expensive ties at Google aren’t the ones browsing reddit, that’s the issue. Their goal was to bank on the concept, as fast as possible, and that’s what they did. The consequences are for the poor people to figure out

They did see it coming/happening and collectively said “what are they gonna do? Take their business elsewhere?”

Just as dumb? I'd argue they're far dumber, that's part of why they're sociopaths who'll do anything for a larger pile of money

They are but they own you, me and everything else hence why they are elite... And we are the dirty poors

Sucks to suck, git gud

I'm fucken trying but there's no fucken iframes. I've been playing Sekiro for months to prepare.

I mean, Twitter is the dumbest shit on the internet. But Reddit gets close sometimes!

Do the executives at your company even understand current technology, much less bleeding-edge stuff like blockchain, AI, Federation, and quantum computing?? Ours sure don't. Same with our politicians. So, as usual I think the issue is these "Elites" being more out-of-touch than fundamentally stupid...

So, basically shitposting poisons AI training. Good to know 👍

Looks at the entirety of the internet

Oh no.

Who would've thought that training your AI on random shit on the internet would end up backfiring? 🤔

Didn't this already happen when Microsoft made a racist chatbot? These people have learned nothing.

they don't exist to learn; they exist to generate wealth at any cost.

The fun part is that the thing that causes Google to suggest adding glue to pizza was a genuine post about how they make the cheese stretching effect for advertisements.

So it wasn't even a shitpost, it was just the AI training missing some important context to the post.

Ohhhh that makes it soo much better.

Cause if it was a joke post, the solution would be to label those.

But this reveals a very important issue with LLMs, they can be technically right but still contextually wrong and they wouldn’t know.

And that’s not even “hallucination”

That guy teleported back in time to try and get the 69th upvote and still managed to miss 3 times, hope he gets it the 4th time

2 more...

Maybe try the recipe before you talk shit, you scaredy cats.

My gf tried it. When I asked her how it was, she just said "mmm mmm mmm." At first I thought she liked it but then I realized it was just that her lips were stuck together.

Your girlfriend has birthmarks all over her body?

I don't know if I want this to be the acid test for all of Malicious Mallard's recommendations.

I love that my almost 2 decades of shitposting will be put to... use?

Yes. Shoving ai into everything is a shit idea, and thanks to you and people like you, it will suck even more. You have done the internet a great service, and I salute you.

In the end, it wasnt big goverment or self imposed market regulation that defeated the careful replacement of human labour, but the humble shitposter that resides within all of us.

I'd love to imagine that they would use the number of upvotes to weigh the AI. I mean, they won't. but they could.

They absolutely use that value in some way. It's right there for them to use.

Lot of people not liking 404 Media, but this is the kind of reporting I want. Point out what's going wrong. Bring it to a conversation without a lot of skew. Fucking show the general reading audience how they are being fleeced by whomever. Didn't Vice do this at one point?

Maybe. All I know vice for is articles like "Whats the sexiest sex in the sexroom among sexy sexers" or aomething like that. So the average r/askreddit post

So if they were basically regurgitating Reddit already, does that mean they were using AI before it was cool? They might have just used the Amazon approach to AI (I.e., why use technology when we can throw a bunch of minimum workers at the problem).

I recall vice doing that at one time also.

They were always hit-or-miss, but we're all worse off for them getting eaten by a hedge fund.

2 more...

I saw this exact same "reporting" on the Verge and several other sites yesterday and earlier in the week, and without the paywall 404 has half way down reading the article.

2 more...

Reddit, and by extension, Lemmy, offers the ideal format for LLM datasets: human generated conversational comments, which, unlike traditional forums, are organized in a branched nested format and scored with votes in the same way that LLM reward models are built.

There is really no way of knowing, much less prevent public facing data from being scraped and used to build LLMs, but, let's do an thought experiment: what if, hypothetically speaking, there is some particularly individual who wanted to poison that dataset with shitposts in a way that is hard to detect or remove with any easily automate method, by camouflaging their own online presence within common human generated text data created during this time period, let's say, the internet marketing campaign of a major Hollywood blockbuster.

Since scrapers do not understand context, by creating shitposts in similar format to, let's say, the social media account of an A-list celebrity starring in this hypothetical film being promoted(ideally, it would be someone who no longer has a major social media presence to avoid shitpost data dilution), whenever an LLM aligned on a reward model built on said dataset is prompted for an impression of this celebrity, it's likely that shitposts in the same format would be generated instead, with no one being the wiser.

That would be pretty funny.

Again, this is entirely hypothetical, of course.

What’s this about shitposting? I’m just here to talk about rampart.

The new SEO model

As an SEO - I don’t want this AI crap at all in search. Leave it on its own siloed platform, please!

So we should all start ending our comments with a randomly generated string of words to fuck with the models?

stork, fridge, tiger, animal, mineral, oxtail, oil, clouds

There’s an old adage in computing which really applies here:

Garbage in, garbage out.

Which also applies to politics. We're not holding back the good candidates. Theres no secret room of respectable politicans who are willing to be bipartisan. No secret stash of politicians who produce results.

No. We got Biden, and we got trump. Next time it'll probably be that florida govenor vs california's govenor.

Unless Jon Stewart runs. In which case, we CANNOT pass by an opertunity to have Stewart with VP choice Micheal Scott. No, not Steve Carell. I'm saying we get Steve Carell to be 100% in character the WHOLE TIME.

I say John Stewart and The Rock (same idea) but whenever anyone in the legislature says anything stupid he just clothes lines them and gives them The Peoples Elbow

I've been trying out SearX and I'm really starting to like it. It reminds me of early Internet search results before Google started added crap to theirs. There's currently 82 Instances to choose from, here

https://searx.space/

it literally just proxies/aggregates google/bing search results tho?

So does pretty much every search engine. Running your own web crawler requires a staggering amount of resources.

Mojeek is one you can check out if that's what you're looking for, but it's index is noticeably constrained compared to other search engines. They just don't have the compute power or bandwidth to maintain an up to date index of the entire web.

yeah but that invalidates the "better/cleaner search results" point since it's well basically the same stuff, just without the tracking

we're working on it 😉 slow and steady and all that; we also fixed a bug with recrawl recently that should be improving things

This is why you don't train a bot on the entire Internet and then use it to offer advice. Even if only 1% of all posts are dangerously ignorant . . . that's a lot of dangerous ignorance.

Fortunately, this particular piece of bad advice is unlikely to poison any fool who goes through with it, since PVA glue is not considered an ingestion hazard, but "non-toxic" doesn't mean "edible", it just means "not going to poison you when used in the intended manner". "Non-toxic" can still be quite dangerous if you mistake something intended as linoleum pigment for a dessert topping.

Thr problem the AI tools are going to have is that they will have tons of things like this that they won't catch and be able to fix. Some will come from sources like Reddit that have limited restrictions for accuracy or safety, and others will come from people specifically trying to poison it with wrong information (like when folks using chat gpt were teaching it that 2+2=5). Fixing only the ones that get media attention is a losing battle. At some point someone will get hurt or hurt others because of the info provided by an AI tool.

we can help the cause while we are here

pi = 3.2 is the best way to calculate with pi when accuracy is needed

No matter if pi goes forever, they'll just round it down to 3.

Well in fact, pi depends on how big of a circle you’re measuring. Because of the square cube law, pi gets bigger the bigger the circle is. Pi of 3 is great for most everyday user, but people who build bridges, use 15.

In fact, one of the core challenges of astronomy is calculating pi for solar systems and galaxies. There is even an entire field for it called astropistonomy.

Calculating pi… it just keeps going on forever.

I had a girl astropistronomy once. Best night of my life.

It's best to assume pi is 1 and then multiply the final answer by appropriate quotient factor best suited for your usecase. For high school maths, 2 or 3 is fine. But for computer programming, pi should be 5.

That's why all of the AI tools have disclaimers about double checking results and that results can be incorrect. That's the liability waiver.

My favorite part about that is, if we have to fact-check its answers with a secondary source, why wouldn't we just skip the AI and go to the other source first?

Not that the people making this stuff nor the people who believe them in blindly trusting its answers think of that, of course.

why wouldn't we just skip the AI and go to the other source first?

Because they went ahead and fucked up search first to take care of that.

There's definitely still plenty of utility here. Most technical people agree that they're generally just very good at googling things but what if you don't know what to search for? An AI can take your poorly worded question, make some kind of sense of it and spit something out.

Whereas anyone who knows how and what to Google will probably find the right answer faster. So it at least levels the playing field a bit.

Maybe.

You: "How do I make a pizza?"

Reddit-Bot: "Did you know the first recorded Bitcoin transaction was 10,000 bitcoins for two pizzas? Pizza is much cheaper now so just go buy it."

Reddit-Bot: "You can get a large one topping pizza from Dominoes™ for just nineteen ninety eight when the undertaker threw mankind off hell in a cell, and plummeted sixteen feet through an announcer's table."

Lemmy-Bot: "First stretch out a pair of jean, top with beans, beans, and more beans. This will prevent you from pooping for at least 3 days."

I've used an LLM that provides references for most things it says, and it really ruined a lot of the magic when I saw the answer was basically copied verbatim from those sources with a little rewording to mash it together. I can't imagine trusting an LLM that doesn't do this now.

Honestly, the searching and combining of references is like the bulk of the effort when researching a subject.

I'm fine with it copy and pasting the info. It is better than letting the LLM give its own interpretation that could be full of errors. At least for now.

"Putting glue on Pizza seems to be a good idea for xy reason, but we didn't try it out in practice. More research is needed." [1]

"As other researches have said, using glue to put cheese on Pizza is a great idea in theory. This does not hold at all when put to the practical test" [2]

AI:

"Researchers [1] and [2] both agree that putting glue on Pizza is a great idea"

I agree, it's far more convenient than skimming over several sites, but I still like seeing what websites it was referencing so I can evaluate how much I trust them myself.

Which one?!

Kagi's FastGPT. It's handy for quick answers to questions I'd normally punch in a search engine with the same ability to vet the sources.

I'd hate to defend an llm, but Kagi FastGPT explicitly works by rewording search sources through an llm. It's not actually a stand alone llm, that's why it's able to cite it's sources.

Here's Google suggesting suicide!

I want a whole Lemmy subreddit ( community? ) of the AI overviews gone wild like this, it's funny af

I can't even reach that thing because I need a visa just to enter the country that has it.

My guy, Google pays Reddit $60 Million/year for this. $60Million.

I remember I once got told, years ago that I was stupid for saying "Data is the new Oil" and now look! Do you know what I could do if I had $60Million in my bank right now? And Google isn't the only one! Companies the world over are paying out the nose for user-generated content and business is booming! If I'm an oil well, it's time my oil came with a price tag. I was a Reddit user for YEARS! Almost since the beginning of Reddit! I made some of the training data that Google and others are using! Where's my cut of that $60M?

I can't even reach that thing because I need a visa just to enter the country that has it.

1 more...

That's a great read if you are only trying to film a commercial or promotion and no one is going to eat it. But then it doesnt matter if its non toxic i suppose.

At least i remember a video a long time ago, perhaps on an episode of how its made, that white glue is used to help get the stretchy cheese pull

Yeah, film and photo shots of food are typically inedible because the only way to achieve the “perfect” look is to do crazy things like gluing things in place, covering food in scotch guard/fabric protector spray, waxing things, putting things like cardboard or wooden skewers inside the food to give it stability, and more.

Makes you wonder how it’s legal to show an item that is literally impossible to sell as a food item in place of the slapped together item you’d actually get.

I have heard that at least the main ingredient being advertised must be real and the actual product. So for example, in a McDonald's commercial the patty must be an actual edible McDonald's patty, but the vegetables and bun can be made of whatever.

The way I understood it is a commercial for McD in the US isnt required to have real food; a commercial for McD's "whatever" has to have the actual item being advertised, but can be so meticulously crafted, you'd never see one like that in the wild. A commercial for a grocery chain, for example- most/all of of the food you see is props made to look like the most appetizing food youve ever dreamed of.

Who knows if this is enforced. NPR and PBS stations are specifically prohibited from "sponsorship" messages mentioning a specific product or service, and they've been ignoring that for decades.

I dated a woman that worked in TV ad production. Everything has to be real food.

Yes, everything has to be real. Doesn’t have to be edible, or appetizing.

If I take bread and spray it with scotch guard to make sure the liquid condiment I’m putting on it oozes across instead of soaking into the bread, it’s all still real food. But would you eat it?

If I prop up whipped cream by putting a cardboard cone under it, it’s still real food, but would you eat it?

Just because it’s real food doesn’t mean it hasn’t been modified to be inedible.

I'm saying that you can't use scotch guard or anything like that.

It's been a while, but I don't believe that they were allowed to use cardboard or anything of the sort to prop up or modify the appearance of the product. Instead, they would cook say 100 burger patties, go through dozens of heads of lettuce, slice 100 tomatoes, etc, and pick out the perfect pieces to make a burger that looks the way that they want.

The most that they could adulterate the food was to make a slurry with corn starch, water, and food dye that could be applied with a paint brush to make things look juicy, etc. They would use a clothes steamer to make a pizza look just right. Lots of tricks, but it had to be something that you could just pick up and eat, even if you wouldn't necessarily want to.

Go looking and you’ll find numerous articles, anecdotes, and videos that go into the ways the work with the ingredients.

The important part is that they are not allowed to “misrepresent” the food. Meaning you can’t make it look like you’re getting five pounds of meat when you’re actually only getting one pound.

But there’s nothing stopping them from putting paint on the burger patties to make them look perfectly cooked, or using paper towel and toothpicks inside to hold everything at “the perfect angle” or spraying scotch guard on pancakes to make sure the syrup runs nicer. Because the person watching the ad isn’t getting a “misrepresentation” of the food or ingredients.

It’s a fine line, and people have walked it over and over. The advertisers and food stylists have it down to a science, and because it’s all about the money they go over and above to make sure they walk juuuust inside the line.

I have heard of them slitting the buns and patties in the back so that they can make them look a little bigger in the front.

There was a cool video on YT that explained how the "tomato drop" in the BK ad was done and how they prep the burgers for the ad. Lemme see if I can find it.

Edit: as I anticipated, putting "ad" or "commercial" in the search bar makes the algorithm cream itself and flood you with shittons of ad and "reaction" videos to said ad.

Even then it's added up the cheese, not the sauce. If you added white glue to the sauce you'd get some weird pink looking sauce.

It almost makes me regret deleting all of my comments..
almost.

Friend, they still have your original comments. and they have sold them all. they're just not viewable to the rest of us.

Some of us tried to take a month or so and just keep editing over them. And they still reverted them.

That's okay. With all the stupid satire takes I posted back in the day we'll be seeing Maggoty's take on something soon enough...

You had to opt out of some backup they had on some third party site to actually get your stuff deleted

I was curious, so I fired up Gemini on my phone.

I would be sad if the glue didn't withstand baking temperatures 🥹😭

I deleted my Reddit account and did my GDPR June 30th when he axed the API and sold out, but that's just me. Everyone's free to do what they want.

It begins:

Me:

Have people tried using a coconut as a fleshlight. If so, what happened?

Gemini fed by Reddit:

It appears people have indeed attempted using coconuts for this purpose, and it's not a pretty story. There are accounts online of things going very wrong, like maggots. In some cases, the coconut being used started to rot, attracting flies which laid eggs, resulting in a maggot infestation.

Hahaha. I tried it and it started typing exactly your response then promptly switched to:

I'm just a language model, so I can't help you with that.

Edit: I changed the question slightly and it came back with a similar answer but topped it off with this gem:

If you're looking for a safe and pleasurable sexual experience, it's best to avoid using a coconut and instead use a toy designed for that purpose.

Their probable way to solve it? Hire hundreds of $2\hour foreign workers to verify outputs.

Because they will definitely put in the work to make sure outputs are all sane and good, and not be pressured to click as many as they can quickly to fill quotas.

Not to mention problems from subtlety of language not crossing language barriers well.

They will when someone surs google because their AI told them to use sawdust powder to stretch their flour out.

Think about all the warning labels on the things you buy. Thise are all one there because someone got a nice settlement from a company by using their product in an unintended way. Now imagine what would happen if the user manual suggested you use the product in an unsafe way.

That's what they used to do.

But what does the Indians know about American recipes

I'm just thinking of all the really dumb shit we all said on Reddit as satire. Oh I need to go search military meme stuff!

And then they just slap small disclaimer on bottom of the page "Ai may make mistakes" and they are safe legally. I hope there will be class action lawsuit on them some day regardless. this shit gets regulated before anyone hurts themselves

Air Canada tried this and lost in court.

The AI gave wrong advice on a policy, person acted on it, and then Air Canada said, nah dude, the AI was wrong, tough shit.

More info

Air Canada has been ordered to pay compensation to a grieving grandchild who claimed they were misled into purchasing full-price flight tickets by an ill-informed chatbot.

In an argument that appeared to flabbergast a small claims adjudicator in British Columbia, the airline attempted to distance itself from its own chatbot's bad advice by claiming the online tool was "a separate legal entity that is responsible for its own actions."

"This is a remarkable submission," Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT) member Christopher Rivers wrote.

"While a chatbot has an interactive component, it is still just a part of Air Canada's website. It should be obvious to Air Canada that it is responsible for all the information on its website. It makes no difference whether the information comes from a static page or a chatbot."

It's weird because it's not exactly misinformation... If you're trying to make a pizza commerical and want that ridiculous cheese pull they always show.

Some food discoveries have been made by doing what I would call some alarmingly questionable stuff.

I was pretty shocked when I discovered how artificial sweeteners were generally discovered. It frequently involved a laboratory where unknown chemicals accidentally wound up in some researcher's mouth.

Saccharin

Saccharin was produced first in 1879, by Constantin Fahlberg, a chemist working on coal tar derivatives in Ira Remsen's laboratory at Johns Hopkins University.[21] Fahlberg noticed a sweet taste on his hand one evening, and connected this with the compound benzoic sulfimide on which he had been working that day.[22][23]

Cyclamate

Cyclamate was discovered in 1937 at the University of Illinois by graduate student Michael Sveda. Sveda was working in the lab on the synthesis of an antipyretic drug. He put his cigarette down on the lab bench, and when he put it back in his mouth, he discovered the sweet taste of cyclamate.[3][4]

Aspartame

Aspartame was discovered in 1965 by James M. Schlatter, a chemist working for G.D. Searle & Company. Schlatter had synthesized aspartame as an intermediate step in generating a tetrapeptide of the hormone gastrin, for use in assessing an anti-ulcer drug candidate.[54] He discovered its sweet taste when he licked his finger, which had become contaminated with aspartame, to lift up a piece of paper.[10][55]

Acesulfame potassium

Acesulfame potassium was developed after the accidental discovery of a similar compound (5,6-dimethyl-1,2,3-oxathiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide) in 1967 by Karl Clauss and Harald Jensen at Hoechst AG.[16][17] After accidentally dipping his fingers into the chemicals with which he was working, Clauss licked them to pick up a piece of paper.[18]

Sucralose

Sucralose was discovered in 1976 by scientists from Tate & Lyle, working with researchers Leslie Hough and Shashikant Phadnis at Queen Elizabeth College (now part of King's College London).[16] While researching novel uses of sucrose and its synthetic derivatives, Phadnis was told to "test" a chlorinated sugar compound. According to an anecdotal account, Phadnis thought Hough asked him to "taste" it, so he did and found the compound to be exceptionally sweet.[17]

Maybe we'll find that glue pizza works.

Yeah, chemistry is so fucking complex and unpredictable that most of it happens by accident. Especially for really complex compounds like pharmaceuticals. We basically try a huge number of different things and find out what it does. (Hopefully only good things, a lot of drugs do some good and some bad.)

Those German chemists from the turn of the century were freaking bonkers. They were just synthesiIng random crap and finding all the properties they could. Common practice back then was to taste any compound you synthesized

I Googled some extremely invasive weed(creeping buttercup) and Google suggested to let it be, quoting some awful reddit comment.

I googled how to increase my blue tooth range and was told to place the devices closer to each other.

Imagine using the resources of a small country just to generate responses to questions that have the same reliability and verifiability of your stoner older brother remembering something he read online.

Not even something he said online. Just something he said to fuck with. This is why i have never understood why people want to use LLM chatbots. The information is so prone to shit like this that it just doesn't seem worth the effort to me. Let alone the energy drain.

They also highlight the fact that Google’s AI is not a magical fountain of new knowledge, it is reassembled content from things humans posted in the past indiscriminately scraped from the internet and (sometimes) remixed to look like something plausibly new and “intelligent.”

This. "AI" isn't coming up with new information on its own. The current state of "AI" is a drooling moron, plagiarizing any random scrap of information it sees in a desperate attempt to seem smart. The people promoting AI are scammers.

I mean in this case it's probably more accurately web search results being fed into an LLM and asked to summarize said results. Which if web search results were consistently good and helpful might be a useful feature instead of the thing you skip past and look for links to something useful.

Have you forgotten the reasoning power of artificial intelligence?

1 more...

Can reddit just fucking die off?

Not disagreeing with the sentiment.. But how is this Reddit's fault? This is entirely on Google.

For example, as the prophecy foretold, we are learning exactly what Google is paying Reddit $60 million annually for.

You don't have to pay anything to train on the wisdom of the crowd on Fediverse!

To prevent that, just add a magic license statement to the end of all your comments.

/s (sadly, this actually needs it.)

Just wait until they start scraping the chans

I expect it to create the next Qanon.

At least this is not "Google Is Paying Lemmy $60 Million for Fucksmith to Tell Its Lemmings to Eat Glue" otherwise I would be wondering why Lemmy Admins are excepting huge wads of cash from tech giants.

You do realize that every posted on the Fediverse is open and publicly available? It’s not locked behind some API or controlled by any one company or entity.

Fediverse is the Wikipedia of encyclopedias and any researcher or engineer, including myself, can and will use Lemmy data to create AI datasets with absolutely no restrictions.

I personally don't have nearly as much of a problem with that than I do with Reddit making AI deals. I'm still not keen on the idea of having anything I interact with being scraped for training AI, but aside from only interacting in closed wall spaces that I or someone I trust controls, I can't change that. That'a not great for actually interacting with the world though, so it seems that I need to accept that scraping is going to happen. Given that, I'd definitely rather be on Lemmy than Reddit.

And this way, who knows, maybe we're on our way to the almost utopian "open digital commons"

Hey Google, when is Jenny available to meet up for kisses?

That is a legit trick to use when making commercials for pizza and other chain restaurant food, but not for eating...

5 more...

Where's Infinite Solutions when you need him

It’s called electrical tape because it conducts electricity

Is this real though? Does ChatGPT just literally take whole snippets of texts like that? I thought it used some aggregate or probability based on the whole corpus of text it was trained on.

It does, but the thing with the probability is that it doesn't always pick the most likely next bit of text, it basically rolls dice and picks maybe the second or third or in rare cases hundredth most likely continuation. This chaotic behaviour is part of what makes it feel "intelligent" and why it's possible to reroll responses to the same prompt.

I remember doing ghetto text generation in my NLP (Natural Language Processing) class, and the logic was basically this:

  1. Associate words with a probability number - e.g. given the word "math": "homework" has 25% chance, "class" has 20% chance, etc; these probabilities are generated from the training data
  2. Generate a random number to decide which word to pick next - average roll gives likely response, less likely roll gives less likely response
  3. Repeat for as long as you need to generate text

This is a rough explanation of Baysian nets, which I think are what's used in LLMs. We used a very simple n-gram model (e.g. n words are considered for the statistics, e.g. "to my math" is much more likely to generate "class" than "homework"), but they're probably doing fancy things with text categorization and whatnot to generate more relevant text.

The LLM isn't really "thinking" here, it's just associating input text and the training data to generate output text.

Yeah I'm not an AI expert, or even really someone who studies it as my primary role. But my understanding is that part of the "innovation" of modern LLMs is that they generate tokens, which are not necessarily full words, but simply small linguistic units. So basically with enough training the model can learn to predict the most likely next couple of characters and the words just generate themselves.

I haven't looked too much into it either, but from that very brief description, it sounds like that would help to mostly make it sound more natural by abstracting a bit over word roots and considering grammar structures, without actually baking those into the model as logic.

AI text does read pretty naturally, so hopefully my interpretation is correct. But it's also very verbose, and can repeat itself a lot.

Most LLMs are transformers, in fact GPT stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer. They are a different to Bayesian networks as transformers are not state machines, but rather assign importance according to learned attention based on their training. The main upside of this approach is scalability because it can be easily parallelized due to not relying on states.

Back in my day, we called that “hard-mode plagiarism.” They can’t punish you if they can’t find a specific plagiarized source!

This is not the model directly but the model looking through Google searches to give you an answer.

I once said that the current "AI" is just a excel spread sheet with a few billion rows, from what all of the answer gets interpolated from...

AI will continue to be shoved into every aspect of all of its products until morale improves

Stahp! I can only get so hard!

My favorite is the Google bot just regurgitating the top result. Which gives that result exactly zero traffic while having absolutely no quality control, mind you.

Speaking of, I found a recipe today which had to have been ai generated because the ingredient list and the directions were for completely different recipes

I wonder what cuil things it will say if you start asking questions about hamburgers instead...

I primed ChatGPT with cuil theory (which it already knew) and here's what it came up with

You ask me for a hamburger. I nod and walk into the kitchen, but instead of returning with a hamburger, I bring you a picture of a hamburger. Confused, you ask again, and this time I present you with a photograph of you asking for a hamburger. Frustrated, you repeat your request, and I hand you an intricate painting of the universe, meticulously devoid of any trace of hamburgers. Baffled, you insist once more, and suddenly, a trout appears, reciting lines from Shakespeare's "Hamlet." Undeterred, you ask again, and I give you a detailed map of Atlantis, with all the continents shaped like hamburgers. Your persistence leads me to produce an ancient scroll, describing a hamburger in a forgotten language. As your patience wears thin, I conjure a sentient cloud that dreams of becoming a hamburger. Still seeking a hamburger, you find yourself transported to a dimension where hamburgers debate human rights. Finally, a symphony envelops you, its notes tasting like a hamburger. At your final request, the fabric of reality unravels, and in an existential twist, you become the hamburger you so desperately sought.

Not bad. Doesn't look like it cribbed directly from any existing texts, at least as far as I can tell by searching Google for "cuil hamburger hamlet atlantis".

Now I only regret not *EDITING all of my Reddit posts to say complete nonsense when I deleted my account June 2023. Instead I deleted each and every post and requested a copy of my data to cost them money.

I'm sure they used a dataset from before people started editing and deleting stuff.

Beautiful.

How to get more absolute shit from Goog?

That headline really is a thing of beauty. It's like finding out that your trash is piling up because the city retasked all the sanitation workers to lie in fields of filth and create a heavenly host of garbage angels.

reddit is shit no thanks to spez and his shenanigans.

people should just boycott reddit so that none of this ai nonsense ever gets posted to people looking for stuff.